Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DoGus Threads 💜

Channel

DoGus Threads 💜

@DoGusThreads

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

73,803subscribers

-3,396 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001390432407
TypeChannel
Username@DoGusThreads
DescriptionIch zeige dir nur den Weg, die Wahl ist deine!
Created14 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DoGusThreads

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

73,80377,19975,5016 August 2026 — 77,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,028 subscribers10 August 2026 — 76,941 subscribers11 August 2026 — 76,865 subscribers12 August 2026 — 76,798 subscribers13 August 2026 — 76,719 subscribers14 August 2026 — 76,641 subscribers16 August 2026 — 76,562 subscribers17 August 2026 — 76,394 subscribers18 August 2026 — 76,308 subscribers19 August 2026 — 76,221 subscribers20 August 2026 — 76,162 subscribers21 August 2026 — 76,096 subscribers23 August 2026 — 75,989 subscribers25 August 2026 — 75,878 subscribers25 August 2026 — 75,813 subscribers26 August 2026 — 75,746 subscribers27 August 2026 — 75,718 subscribers28 August 2026 — 75,669 subscribers29 August 2026 — 75,630 subscribers30 August 2026 — 75,551 subscribers31 August 2026 — 75,458 subscribers1 September 2026 — 75,397 subscribers2 September 2026 — 75,346 subscribers3 September 2026 — 75,259 subscribers5 September 2026 — 75,119 subscribers9 September 2026 — 74,918 subscribers11 September 2026 — 74,721 subscribers13 September 2026 — 74,580 subscribers15 September 2026 — 74,481 subscribers17 September 2026 — 74,385 subscribers19 September 2026 — 74,247 subscribers26 September 2026 — 73,803 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -3,396. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,294–77,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 11:3873,803-444
19 Sept 2026, 15:1774,247-138
17 Sept 2026, 05:5974,385-96
15 Sept 2026, 04:5774,481-99
13 Sept 2026, 16:0074,580-141
11 Sept 2026, 17:3774,721-197
9 Sept 2026, 03:3974,918-201
5 Sept 2026, 21:0175,119-140
3 Sept 2026, 17:1675,259-87
2 Sept 2026, 11:3475,346-51
1 Sept 2026, 14:3875,397-61
31 Aug 2026, 14:4475,458-93
30 Aug 2026, 16:0475,551-79
29 Aug 2026, 16:1675,630-39
28 Aug 2026, 17:4875,669-49
27 Aug 2026, 19:2875,718-28
26 Aug 2026, 22:2375,746-67
25 Aug 2026, 23:4275,813-65
25 Aug 2026, 01:5475,878-111
23 Aug 2026, 12:3575,989first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 73,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,000
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
92.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held22 (25 January 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total16,000
Reactions total14,730
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 01:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,030
Videos
≈2,700
Links
≈2,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37m 38s
Average length
2m 54s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

57,535 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍40,47970.4%
❤7,55813.1%
🔥2,8374.93%
🎉2,1443.73%
👏1,3362.32%
💯9441.64%
🙏8661.51%
❤‍🔥6561.14%
🤩3770.655%
⚡970.169%
🥰900.156%
🤝860.149%
🏆420.073%
🤗150.026%
😘70.012%
😍10.002%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,535 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
218
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 21 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DoGusThreads. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC≈5,400 views10,545 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Video

An ALLe meine Hater. Schaut euch das gut an 😎 👇 https://youtu.be/K1N8NAWhQmg?is=JbrodplaJooT3xgp @DoQusThreads

👍3,450❤3,430🔥1,460🎉1,410👏786❤‍🔥8😍1

Signed Ugod

13 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈10,600 views4,185 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Da ich musikalisch jetzt durchstarte, bin ich wieder auf Facebook. Würde mich freuen, wenn wir uns dort vernetzten könnten. 👇 https://www.facebook.com/share/196UWsHh4G/?mibextid=wwXIfr Dankeschön 🚀 @DoGusThreads

👍2,470🔥448👏441🎉406❤398❤‍🔥9⚡8🙏5

Signed Ugod

17 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈16,200 views3,986 reactions18 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Dies hat dich aus einem Grund gefunden… Ja, du bist anders. Ja, du stichst heraus und ja, sie sehen dich. Du sollst in diesem Leben gesehen und gehört werden. Du bist nicht dazu bestimmt, es so zu machen wie ALLe anderen. Du bist Magie und dies hat dich gefunden, weil du ein neues Geschenk in dir freisetzt. Du stehst kurz davor, in den nächsten Monaten etwas zu erreichen, von dem du aufgrund deiner aktuellen Umstände…

❤2,560🤩344🔥337🎉307👍283🙏55❤‍🔥51💯24

Signed Ugod

14 May 2026, 18:27 UTC≈25,900 views2,468 reactions10 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Es wird noch ein paar Jahre dauern, bis du herausfinden wirst, dass man Früchte in Einmachgläsern ganz lange frisch aufbewahren kann. Sie halten dann fast ewig. Diese hier im Bild sind schon über 3 Wochen alt. Jetzt ist es kein Glück mehr, wenn sie länger als 5 Tage halten. Probiere es aus. Bitteschön 😇 @DoGusThreads

👍2,210🙏119❤41🔥30❤‍🔥19🥰18👏17🤩10

Signed Ugod

8 May 2026, 21:52 UTC≈25,300 views598 reactions30 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Anzeichen einer Entgiftung: Husten, Schleim, Fieber, Schwitzen, Müdigkeit, Schmerzen, Ausschläge, metallischer Geschmack, Stimmungsschwankungen. Du „fängst dir nicht etwas ein“, dein Körper reinigt sich von Giftstoffen und reagiert auf deine Umwelt. Statt deine Symptome als Problem zu sehen, das behoben werden muss, betrachte sie als Teil des Heilungsprozesses. Dein Körper arbeitet immer im Dienst deiner Gesundheit. …

❤286💯155👍65🙏46❤‍🔥23🔥13👏6🤝3

Signed Ugod

8 May 2026, 14:33 UTC≈20,200 views469 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Es gibt keine Viren die dich umbringen können, aber es gibt Impfstoffe, die es können!!!!!! Vergiss das nicht! @DoGusThreads

💯302👍81🔥32❤25🤝13❤‍🔥12⚡2🤩2

Signed Ugod

24 Mar 2026, 02:08 UTC≈29,000 views2,656 reactions31 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Okay, jetzt, wo wir feststecken, wünsche ich euch von Herzen ALLes Gute. Die Welt ist brutal. Rücksichtslos, nur auf eure Kosten egoistisch und gleichgültig gegenüber euren Verlusten. Sie lässt keinen sicheren Ort für Erholung und neue Kraft. Und doch bleibt unter ALL dem Schutt der Wunsch bestehen, sich miteinander zu verbinden und einander mit ALLer Kraft loyal zu sein. So sind wir Menschen gebaut und dafür sind wi…

👍2,230❤‍🔥136❤105💯72🙏34🤝27🔥20⚡10

Signed Ugod

3 Mar 2026, 18:40 UTC≈28,700 views2,258 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Der Mond verfärbt sich gleich. Hier in Deutschland. Und für 82 Minuten wird der Himmel völlig anders aussehen. Gleich blicken Millionen von Menschen zum selben Himmel auf. @DoQusThreads

👍2,110🔥51🙏45❤31🎉6💯6🥰5🤩4

Signed Ugod

24 Feb 2026, 21:44 UTC≈34,100 views2,440 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Wenn die Zukunft dich auffordert, etwas zu erschaffen, das es noch nie gegeben hat, als Antwort auf eine Herausforderung, der die Menschheit noch nie gegenüberstand, dann gibt es keinen Bauplan. Keinen Mentor. Kein fertiges Netzwerk, das dich auffängt. Da bist nur du. Deine Impulse. Deine Eingebungen. Deine Quelle. Und die Energie deiner Zukunft. Und ein unerschütterliches Vertrauen in diese unbeschreibliche Führung,…

👍2,150❤‍🔥91❤73🙏40💯35🔥18🥰13🤝7

Signed Ugod

20 Feb 2026, 21:10 UTC≈26,500 views2,535 reactions12 Starsread 27 September 2026
Video

Teil 1. Jedes Gerät, das du in der Hand hältst, jeder Smart-Tower, an dem du vorbeigehst, jede „Impfung“, die sie dir aufgedrängt haben, sind keine zufälligen Technologien. Es sind Teile eines Gitters. Eines Gitters, das nicht dazu da ist, dich zu schützen, sondern deinen unendlichen Willen umzuprogrammieren. Dein Handy?? Ein Stimmungs-Manipulator. Dein Schlaf? Gehackt. Deine Gedanken? Vorab überwacht. Deine Seele…

👍2,180🙏117❤78💯72🔥38❤‍🔥34🤝7⚡5

Signed Ugod

18 Feb 2026, 17:37 UTC≈20,800 views2,131 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Wenn du denkst, dass du bereit bist, dann lese mit: https://t.me/Dogumentation/4582 Wenn nicht, dann LASS ES!!!

👍2,060🔥21🙏17❤15👏10💯8

Signed Ugod

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @DoGusThreads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

️ Silke Schaefer Astrologie Offiziell
@silkeschaefer · 121,301
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DoGus Threads 💜” (@DoGusThreads), 73,803 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DoGusThreads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.