Photo, posted without a caption
😁16💯4

Channel
@DissidencePeople
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,228subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001471028157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DissidencePeople |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DissidencePeople |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 1,228 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 1,225 | -12 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 1,237 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 1,238 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:08 | 1,242 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 1,240 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 1,239 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 1,245 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 1,246 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,245 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 1,249 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,249 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
312 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 118 | 37.8% | |
| 🤣 | 93 | 29.8% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 9.62% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 4.17% | |
| 💩 | 10 | 3.21% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.60% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.28% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.962% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.321% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.321% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.321% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁16💯4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Je sais pas si quelqu'un avait déjà relevé cette farce mais sur cette photo, le mongolo est devant un contre torpilleur polonais de 1935 qui est depuis 1976 un navire musée bien loin de la "front line" ! https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORP_B%C5%82yskawica
🤣19🔥5🌚3❤2😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁11
Video, posted without a caption
😁10
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣15❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
😁23❤5💩2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁17❤2🐳1
Video, posted without a caption
😁9
Il dit qu'il a connu Bob denard il est plutôt précoce le Alexis. Puisque Bob denard est mort en 2007. Comme je vous le dis encore un mitho il s'attribue des faits d'armes. Qui ne sont pas juste rien ne correspond au date qu'il dit 🙊 et spaggiari et reliez à sa famille on se demande comment tu n'en as pas marre Alexis de nous raconter du pipot🤣. Il n'y a que toi qui croient tes bobbars🤣. Et oui les gens faites des rec…
😁7❤2👍2
Preuve qu'Issaurat est handicapé mental : 1) Il ne sait pas écrire 2) Ses mouvements au niveau de sa tête toutes les 10 secondes 3) Il ment et se contredit toujours (mythomanie pathologique) 4) S'invente un passé fantasmé qu'il n'a jamais eu tout en inventant un autre passé à la même époque (sois disant en clandestinité entre 2009-2019 tout en se baladant tranquillement en s'adonnant au trafic d'armes après la di…
😁8❤6🤣3
priorité aux potins !!! Kroc Blanc vient de gagner son procès en diffamation contre Kentra et Papacito. Les dommages et intérêts sont de 10000 euros en faveur de Kroc Blanc. Rappel des faits. La vidéo clip où Kroc Blanc semble dire vouloir « baiser une gamine » est un montage et la justice lui donne raison. Il a gagné son procès en diffamation contre Papacito et Kentra qui ont dû payer environ 5000 € chacun. L'aut…
👏23🤣13🍌3🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DissidencePeople. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌸 Dissidence People” (@DissidencePeople), 1,228 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DissidencePeople.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.