Posted without readable text
🤣5

Channel
@DikayaLvovna
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001819367891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DikayaLvovna |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DikayaLvovna |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 154 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:02 | 153 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 155 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 154 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 154 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 16.5% | |
| 🤣 | 19 | 15.7% | |
| 🐳 | 11 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5188452881639962044 | 10 | 8.26% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 7.44% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| custom 5474429881724988966 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.826% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🤣5
Вообще грустно. Первое за много-много лет лето без отпуска и ...
😢5
#нашевсёкаждыйдень и прекрасный Никита
❤4custom 51884528816399620442
Мраморную голову статуи Венеры возрастом около 2 тыс. лет обнаружили на пляже в Испании во время земляных работ. По предварительным данным экспертов, найденная голова была частью полноразмерной статуи, а не отдельным бюстом. Фото: X/Conquinceletras
«В одну из ясных, лунных ночей меня разбудили стоны, визг и пыхтение; полагая, что это пара влюбленных котов, я высунулся из окна, чтобы высказать все, что я о них думаю, но, к своему удивлению, обнаружил двух ежей. Решив рассмотреть вблизи, чем они были так заняты, я всунул ноги в шлепанцы и выбежал в сад. Оказывается, они угостились полусгнившими яблоками, чей сок превратился в сидр. Оба ежа были здорово пьяны: они…
🤣4👏3⚡1
Про "Волшебника Изумрудного города" забыли, где Элли на маковом поле спала... В России обновили перечень книг, содержащих упоминания наркотических средств и подлежащих маркировке. С ним ознакомился ТАСС. В перечень вошли: ▪️"Заводной апельсин" Энтони Берджесса; ▪️"Доктор Сон", "Ночные кошмары и фантастические видения" Стивена Кинга; ▪️"Зов Ктулху" Говарда Лавкрафта; ▪️"Удушье", "Рождение звука" Чака Паланика; ▪️"В…
💅1
Люблю красиво получаться на фото
🔥13❤5
🇮🇹 Итальянский певец Пупо обзавелся портретом Пушкина. Артист выступил в Зеленом театре на ВДНХ. В начале вечера один из зрителей подарил музыканту портрет Александра Пушкина, и Пупо подтвердил, что ему хорошо знакомо имя русского классика 📲 Подпишись на Ленту дня в Max 🎁 Участвуй в розыгрыше
custom 51884528816399620442
#нашевсёкаждыйдень в парке Милютина, г. Череповец.
🔥2✍1custom 51884528816399620441
Песня «Шадэ» получила свою первую филологическую экспертизу 🤓 Помните школьный вопрос «Что хотел сказать автор?». Редактор «Мела» Иван Шарков применил его к главному хиту этого лета: разобрал текст по строчкам, поискал скрытые смыслы и объяснил, почему некоторые образы работают, а некоторые — совсем нет А вы на чьей стороне? 🤔 — Ни разу не слышал(а) 🔥 — «Шадэ» в плейлисте 👎 — Не зашла ❤️ — Только оригинальная певи…
❤2🔥1🥱1
Нашевсё и Чеховпавловичантон в РнД
custom 51884528816399620444custom 54744298817249889664💯1
...и я начну вздрагивать, заметив машину того же цвета и той же марки, заслышав знакомую музыку в окнах чужих домов, и чувствовать себя чёртовой нелегалкой, которая ищет кров. Вот я мечусь от ЖД вокзала до крайбольницы, словно мышь в лабиринте, что без пяти покойница, вот огрызаюсь на любые фразы, словно дикая львица, оправдывая своё отчество. Словно бык, чьё горло насквозь проткнула пика тореадора, валюсь на пол и з…
❤8👏3🎉2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DikayaLvovna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дикая Львовна” (@DikayaLvovna), 154 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DikayaLvovna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.