Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᴅɪɢɪᴛᴀʟᴠɪʀᴛ ☁️ 情报站

Channel

ᴅɪɢɪᴛᴀʟᴠɪʀᴛ ☁️ 情报站

@DigitalVirtStation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,696subscribers

+50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583283832
TypeChannel
Username@DigitalVirtStation
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DigitalVirtStation

Growth

3,6413,6963,668.57 August 2026 — 3,646 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,646 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,645 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,641 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,654 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,679 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,686 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,696 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,633–3,704 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:543,696+10
24 Aug 2026, 18:053,686+7
20 Aug 2026, 18:533,679+8
17 Aug 2026, 20:543,671+17
15 Aug 2026, 05:183,654+13
11 Aug 2026, 10:543,641-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:313,645-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:313,646no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:253,646first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 3,696 subscribers
Avg views / post
888
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.154%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,545
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎2262.9%
1337.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC310 viewsread 7 August 2026

📢 🚧 安全风险提醒公告 🚧 尊敬的用户: 近期虚拟化环境安全风险持续升高,存在可突破虚拟机隔离的安全隐患,有可能引发业务异常、数据损坏或丢失等突发情况。该类风险属于底层虚拟化层面问题,用户在虚拟机内部无法自行彻底规避。 我方技术团队正在对底层集群进行安全加固处理,部分节点维护期间可能出现短暂业务波动。即便完成加固,仍无法完全排除极端突发风险。 请各位用户务必高度重视自身业务数据安全,养成定期备份数据的习惯,重要业务建议做好异地多份备份,不要单纯依赖平台快照功能,同时定期校验备份文件是否可用。 同时建议做好服务器安全防护,使用高强度账号密码,收紧对外端口访问权限,日常留意服务器运行状态。如遇到异常情况,请及时提交工单联系我们处理。 数据备份是业务安全的最后保障,请务必重视。

7 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC389 viewsread 7 August 2026

📢 🚧 美国 Pro 维护通知通知 🚧 🔧 维护内容:美国 Pro 维护通知 🔍 影响服务:美国 Pro 🕛 维护开始时间:北京时间 2026 年 08 月 08 日 00:00 ⏱️ 维护预计使用:5 小时左右 在此期间, 美国 Pro 区维护的机器将受到不同程度的影响。 我们理解维护可能给您带来的不便,并深表歉意。请知悉我们将尽力使此过程尽可能平滑,并感谢您的理解与耐心等待 📢 想及时获取更多信息,请加入我们的群组和频道: - 群组: [加入群组](https://t.me/DigitalVirtLLC) - 频道: [关注频道](https://t.me/DigitalVirtStation) - 网站频道:[网站频道](https://digitalvirt.net) 感谢您的理解和支持,我们为给您带来的不便表示歉意。 DigitalVirt Team

7 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC583 viewsread 7 August 2026

我们检测到 美国 9929 区域 154.12.5x.x 存在突发大流量攻击 目前正在解决!

6 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC721 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

美国 Pro、美国 CN2 、美国 CMIN2、香港 Pro、香港 Lite 目前已售罄,有需要的用户可以关注下官网!

1

6 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC939 viewsread 7 August 2026

观察到 ISP 运营商 Cogent 和 中国移动国际互联再次发生拥塞,我们抱歉地通知您:我们暂时没有能力解决该问题。 近期,由于运营商跨境出口过载,导致出现间歇性丢包及速率下降,该问题在 ISP 产品上表现尤为明显。由于运营商扩容需国家工信部审批,该周期较长,由此带来的不便,敬请谅解。

5 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC887 viewsread 7 August 2026

美国 9929 - 38.246.230.x 区域正在进行宿主机迁移,如果您的 IP 段 目前无法访问,请稍安勿躁。

5 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC898 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

给公告频道增加一个单独显示的网站: 官网:https://DigitalVirt.com 群组:https://t.me/DigitalVirtLLC 公告频道:https://DigitalVirt.net/

5 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026

观察到洛杉矶 9929 回国方向发生拥塞,系联通公司跨境出口容量不足,目前已疏导至备用线路,丢包已缓解。

5 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC933 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤐🤐🤐🤐 美国 9929 区域 154.40.49.x 段 客户反馈近期网路质量很拉,所以我们紧急进行处理,如果您在今日发现无法使用或网络断联,属正常现象,我们正在调整网络,请稍安勿躁!!

4 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,000 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

找 nodeloc 管理给大家要了个邀请链接,没注册的可以去注册了 https://www.nodeloc.com/invites/TWB7wYP3KU

👎1

4 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,050 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

我们在 nodeloc 发布了一个抽奖,有账户的朋友可以去申请参加抽奖了。 https://www.nodeloc.com/t/topic/102094?sort=top

👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @DigitalVirtStation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,034
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
Github_2dust
@github_2dust · 90,841
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴅɪɢɪᴛᴀʟᴠɪʀᴛ ☁️ 情报站” (@DigitalVirtStation), 3,696 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DigitalVirtStation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.