12 measurements spanning 28 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,910–3,987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 16:01
3,919
-14
1 Sept 2026, 02:06
3,933
-9
28 Aug 2026, 22:08
3,942
-1
26 Aug 2026, 06:24
3,943
-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:49
3,947
-8
19 Aug 2026, 18:26
3,955
-11
16 Aug 2026, 16:48
3,966
+4
13 Aug 2026, 10:19
3,962
-8
10 Aug 2026, 17:26
3,970
-7
8 Aug 2026, 03:18
3,977
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:01
3,978
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:56
3,978
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 9 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
820 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
247
30.1%
🔥
170
20.7%
😭
161
19.6%
👍
118
14.4%
😢
51
6.22%
💔
23
2.80%
🤝
18
2.20%
💘
9
1.10%
😨
9
1.10%
🗿
4
0.488%
😡
3
0.366%
👎
2
0.244%
👏
2
0.244%
💩
2
0.244%
🤡
1
0.122%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 820 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 15 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DigitalUmma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 January 2025 to 15 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌒 Присоединяйтесь к первому прямому эфиру — Sajda Community Impact 2025! Который состоится 18 февраля, ин ша Аллах!
🕌 Мы расскажем как текущий функционал Sajda помогает улучшать религиозную практику, познакомим вас с командой, поделимся важными обновлениями приложения.
Это возможность узнать о будущем Sajda и внести свой вклад в его развитие!
🗒 Пройдите по ссылке, чтобы принять участие:
→ Приглашение на трансл…
Друзья, Ассаляму алейкум! Нам очень жаль, что наш форум отменился, тем более, что некоторые спикеры специально купили билеты в Алмату.
Один из таких спикеров - Мурад Алискеров, которого мы очень ждали с Дагестана.
Мурад Алискеров:
•генеральный директор компании ЛяРиба-Финанс
•кандидат экономических наук
•предприниматель
•общественный и научный деятель
•финансист
•эксперт по исламскому праву
•победитель независимой …
Маңызды хабарландыру
Ассаляму алейкум, құрметті бауырлар мен әпке-қарындастар!
Біз сіздерге 8 ақпанға жоспарланған Digital Umma форумы өтпейтінін өкінішпен хабарлаймыз. Бұл шешім біздің бақылауымыздан тыс жағдайларға байланысты орын алды және оны қабылдау ұйымдастырушылар, спикерлер мен серіктестер үшін оңай болған жоқ.
Біз осы жобаға көп идеялар мен мағыналар енгіздік, ол мыңдаған адамдардың ықыласын тудырып, нәт…
Стартап бастамағандар, сізді не тоқтатып тұрғанын жазыңыздар, ал бастап кеткендер жобаларыңыз туралы айтып беріңіздер 🙏🏻
Кто еще не начал стартап, напишите, что вас останавливает, а кто уже начал, рассказывайте про свои проекты 🙏🏻
Telegram Premium қолданушыларының барлығын төмендегі сілтеме арқылы арнамызға дауыс беруге шақырамыз 👇🏻
Просим всех, у кого есть телеграм премиум проголосовать за наш канал по ссылке 👇🏻
https://t.me/boost/DigitalUmma
Сондай-ақ, сіздермен былтырғы форумның видеосын бөлісеміз.
🔥1-ден 10-ға дейін қалай бағалайсыздар?
Также делимся с вами видео с прошлогоднего форума
🔥Как вам от 1-10?
Бүгін форумымыз туралы тағы да ақпаратпен бөлісеміз, ал қазір маңызды сұрақ қойғымыз келеді.
ШЫНАЙЫ ЖАУАП БЕРІҢІЗ 🫡
Сегодня раскроем вам еще информацию про наш форум, а пока хотим задать важный вопрос
ОТВЕЧАТЬ ЧЕСТНО 🫡
Ассаляму алейкум! Демалыс күндеріңіз қалай өтті? Жаңа аптаға дайынсыз ба? 🔥
Ассаляму алейкум! Как прошли ваши выходные? Готовы к новой неделе?
🔥 - готов на всё 100
❤️ - еще настраиваюсь
😢 - хочу выходные
🔥105❤28😢21👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @DigitalUmma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 15 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digital Umma 25’” (@DigitalUmma), 3,919 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DigitalUmma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.