Что вы сделали? Когда клиент сказал «Я подумаю»
- Ждал50%
- Начал убеждать0%
- Сделал скидку0%
- Задал уточняющий вопрос50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@Diana_Razdimalina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,887subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001995525187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Diana_Razdimalina |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Diana_Razdimalina |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 1,887 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 1,890 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 1,897 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:07 | 1,902 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 1,907 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 1,905 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 1,906 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 1,912 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 1,915 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 1,924 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 1,929 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,935 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 1,935 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5442616732545983624 | 25 | 50.0% | |
| custom 5440652820095182800 | 13 | 26.0% | |
| custom 5438501135969170287 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| custom 5386508452317114365 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| custom 5443119303849158787 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| custom 5386523871249706381 | 2 | 4.00% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что вы сделали? Когда клиент сказал «Я подумаю»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Мне надо подумать.» Есть фраза, после которой многие эксперты начинают проигрывать продажу. Не потому что клиент отказался. А потому что дальше начинается диалог... в их собственной голове. «Наверное, дорого.» «Наверное, я плохо объяснила.» «Надо было ещё рассказать про методику.» «Может, предложить скидку?» «Может, ещё бесплатно созвониться?» Знакомо❓ За последние месяцы я заметила одну закономерность. 📍Очень …
🔥Мысль после разборов. За эту неделю я снова увидела одну закономерность. ✅Психолог может два часа разбирать ситуацию клиента. ✅Нутрициолог — подробно объяснять питание, анализы и отвечать на десятки вопросов. ✅Коуч для предпринимателей — бесплатно разбирать стратегию бизнеса почти до мелочей. И всё это спокойно. Без страха. Но как только приходит момент сказать стоимость работы... Появляются сомнения. «Може…
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥После каждого разбора я всё больше убеждаюсь в одной мысли. Хороших специалистов намного больше, чем действительно востребованных. И дело почти никогда не в знаниях. Я знаю психологов, которые учатся больше десяти лет. Нутрициологов, которые могут часами разбирать анализы. Коучей, которые искренне переживают за каждого клиента. Но когда дело доходит до продажи… Они начинают сомневаться. Слишком много объясня…
custom 54406528200951828002custom 54426167325459836242
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥После 30 разборов я заметила одну ошибку, которая встречается почти у всех. Люди умеют подробно рассказывать, что они делают. Но редко могут объяснить, зачем. А ведь именно здесь очень часто и теряются время, силы и деньги. Поэтому я давно пользуюсь одним простым чек-листом. Перед любым действием задайте себе три вопроса. ✅1️⃣Зачем я это делаю? Не «потому что так принято». Не «потому что все так делают». А како…
custom 54426167325459836242
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥Сегодня гуляла с собакой и снова подумала, как часто мы, люди, сами усложняем простые вещи. Если собаке что-то нужно, она не рассказывает длинную историю. Она очень понятно показывает свою настоящую потребность. А мы почему-то привыкли сразу искать решение. Особенно в работе с клиентами. Человек приходит к психологу и говорит: — «Хочу перестать тревожиться». И эксперт уже начинает рассказывать, как работать с тре…
custom 54426167325459836241
Sticker, posted without a caption
Сегодня поймала себя на одной мысли. 📍Раньше мне казалось, что если я не работаю, значит теряю время. Поэтому всё время куда-то бежала. Что-то придумывала. Что-то дописывала. А сейчас всё чаще замечаю, что самые хорошие идеи приходят не за ноутбуком. ✅А после массажа. ✅После бани. ✅Во время прогулки с собаками. ✅За чашкой чая с мамой. Когда голова наконец перестаёт шуметь. Наверное, настоящий отдых — это не …
custom 54406528200951828003custom 54385011359691702872custom 53865238712497063811custom 54426167325459836241
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Diana_Razdimalina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вы сделали? Когда клиент сказал «Я подумаю»
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто больше себя узнает?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продажи на лайте с Дианой Раздымалиной🫰🫰🫰🧑🎓” (@Diana_Razdimalina), 1,887 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Diana_Razdimalina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.