Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Diamond Paws

@DiamondPawsBSC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526884741
TypeChannel
Username@DiamondPawsBSC
DescriptionHere we have Diamond Paws
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 12 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DiamondPawsBSC

Growth

177 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:1717no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0817first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
31
Videos
2
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1941.3%
🔥1328.3%
817.4%
🎉36.52%
🥰36.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2022 to 14 March 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2022, 02:28 UTC847 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Will keep you updated here on a relaunch this project could still do great and I’m super bullish on it still especially with the diamond paws community, just need a better chart!

👍3

14 Mar 2022, 02:27 UTC768 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Most devs would use that 10+BnB and the project still not succeeding as a deterrent, but im not going to let this go to waste I really do want to make sure I try everything for this, to have a solid floor that can hold as well as a planned out relaunch I will be doing the relaunch on the 26th March AEST time zone at some I haven’t spoken to the dev yet so I will speak to him and make sure it aligns with his times too

👍4

14 Mar 2022, 02:27 UTC545 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Alright guys that most recent call cost 1bnb and got 0$ in buys, I’m down 6.5bnb from my own funds and have spent over 10bnb all up in marketing and have spent hours on this project being here, this community is so great and I really do think it’s unique most of the real holders here can actually hold and I know you all believe in this name and community as much as me!

🥰2👍1

13 Mar 2022, 11:35 UTC337 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @cactitradesPhoto

Just found this, currently at 9K marketcap, LP locked for 3 years, alot of channel already called, moonshot potential https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xa1cf4823eb1e2730bd2f8182323c8991579408ad https://t.me/diamondpawsofficial DYOR🌵

👍3

13 Mar 2022, 11:16 UTC323 viewsread 11 August 2026

Got some marketing lined up let’s get the chart looking good before it🔥

13 Mar 2022, 09:48 UTC349 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

There’s a point in a chart, (although very rare in BSC) when there are no sells and the community is all holding together, it’s at these times that just make you want to hold so much more with everyone beside you, we are all here to become financially free and id like to think we all want to see eachother succeed, so hold there has maybe been 1 or 2 sells today and those people are missing out on this oppurtunity the

🔥5🎉1🥰1

13 Mar 2022, 09:23 UTC167 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Vitalik_CallsPhoto

14x @ ath after called here Even after those gains chart held up nicely and is still in a bullish pattern. Now 10k mc If you missed this, I would suggest looking into this Diamond paw community! Re: 💰 Paid Promo 💰 Dyor..nfa https://t.me/DiamondPawsBSC This just launched dev is safe this is his first project, I like the name could do well and be a slow mooner they’ve got Reddit marketing and some other organic g

1🔥1

13 Mar 2022, 08:28 UTC543 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀🚀Twitter Contest 🏆🏆 For the next 24h, we are opening a twitter shilling/engagement contest to spread the word #DiamondPawsBSC What to do? -Create a post and/or reply to others on Twitter about Diamond Paws, make sure to add: the website, poocoin and telegram links below on the post tell them about our 3 year lp lock and doxxed dev! https://www.diamondpawsbsc.com/ https://t.me/diamondpawsofficial https://poocoin

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DiamondPawsBSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Diamond Paws” (@DiamondPawsBSC), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiamondPawsBSC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.