This channelโs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ 60%, no better than a coin flip โ because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
8 measurements spanning 25 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 2,777โ2,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 12:05
2,780
-5
26 Aug 2026, 17:06
2,785
-2
23 Aug 2026, 23:18
2,787
-4
20 Aug 2026, 04:11
2,791
+2
17 Aug 2026, 10:42
2,789
-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:11
2,791
-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:00
2,797
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:16
2,797
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
0.53%
avg views รท 2,780 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.7
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (7 August 2026 โ 7 August 2026)
Views total
265
Reactions total
โ
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐งๅฎๆนไปฃ็
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Only 1 capsule , effective in 5 mins
If you facing this..
๐๐ปNot h4rd fully..
๐๐ปNot b1g, l4ng enough..
๐๐ปNot l0ng lasting enough...
Let me help you with Superbman
๐ช๐ปIncrease performance, quantity and quality of sp3rm..
๐ช๐ปIncrease s1ze for b1ggr and l4nger..
๐ช๐ปL0nger lasting, your partner will s4t1sfied..
โ 0 Side Effect
โ Effective in 5 mins
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
1 PC = Rm35
3 Pโฆ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DgirlsEsscort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 39,523 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DgirlsEsscort named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@merryblue161 named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โMerry Blue ๐๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฌ +60172924912โ (@DgirlsEsscort), 2,780 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DgirlsEsscort.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
