Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы Деза🔑

Channel

Отзывы Деза🔑

@DezzReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003071063995
TypeChannel
Username@DezzReviews
Created13 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DezzReviews

Growth

121312.510 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12 subscribers10 August 202626 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 05:3312-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:3013no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:4913first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 13 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2026, 06:31 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

купила звёзды легко и быстро,удобно и безопасно советую

18 Jan 2026, 19:37 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

@soveraze покупаю у этого человека не в первый раз все четко,без скама

23 Dec 2025, 22:00 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

@q0uzo купила у этого человека в первый раз и не пожалела,все четко, звезды пришли за пол часа и цены низкие,без скама

20 Oct 2025, 18:04 UTC57 viewsread 12 August 2026

@Mcbaud Покупаю у этого человека не в первый не в второй раз все четко ✅ звезды ⭐️ приходя быстро 💨 и четко цены низкие 💖советую всем покупать у этого человека 🛡️ все проходит ‼️без СКАМА ‼️все приходит четко еще раз отмечу ❤️‍🔥

18 Oct 2025, 19:03 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026

@mcBaud +rep покупайте звезды ⭐️ у него все классно без скама тип приятный ✅делает все на высшем уровне так еще цены 📈дешевые ❤️‍🔥

15 Oct 2025, 14:45 UTC50 viewsread 12 August 2026

@mcbaud Чистый тип, хороший гарант все сделал четко. по крайней мере лучше чем мс дак

13 Oct 2025, 19:47 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026

@mcbaud тип красавчик, топовый гарант, сделал все быстро и с малейшей комиссией +реп

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DezzReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы Деза🔑” (@DezzReviews), 12 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DezzReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.