Channel
@Dexe_network
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,434subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001454580731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dexe_network |
| Description | An innovative infrastructure for creating and governing DAOs. 50+ smart-contracts for your web-3 product. Create your DAO through easy interface on dexe.io |
| Created | 18 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dexe_network |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:39 | 7,434 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 7,435 | -22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 7,457 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,460 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 7,460 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 41.0% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 19.9% | |
| custom 5330121020688838593 | 28 | 17.9% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A working thesis for the next 24 months: Every serious DAO protocol will ship an AI-native interface layer. Protocol-side. Open. Composable. The protocols without one will fall behind. The protocols with one will define a category. The question isn't if. It's who ships first.
👍17❤14🔥2
🤝DeXe Protocol is partnering with RWAlabs.ae to bridge UAE-based RWA structuring, legal and compliance frameworks with DAO-native governance infrastructure Together, we’re bringing transparent on-chain rules, decision-making, and treasury operations for tokenized asset programs Read more 👉Medium
❤6
💰DeXe Staking Pools Are Now Live!💰 🔥 DeXe DAO officially launches a new staking phase with 80,000 DEXE allocated across four governance‑enabled pools on BNB Chain and Ethereum 💡Key highlights: ✔ 4 Staking Pools: 1‑month & 3‑month durations ✔ Multi‑Chain: live on BNB Chain and Ethereum ✔ Governance‑Integrated: staked tokens retain full voting power in DeXe DAO This new staking round is designed to welcome new parti…
👍3
💰 $200,000 in Rewards Proposed for DeXe DAO Staking 💰 A new set of proposals is live in DeXe DAO, introducing the next staking phase with $200,000 in rewards across multiple pools This round expands staking to both BNB Chain and Ethereum, with two flexible durations — 1 month and 3 months — designed to attract new participants, activate DAO engagement, and strengthen on‑chain governance Each pool preserves full vo…
👍2❤1
GM to those building their DAO Keep building. Onchain, your efforts won't go unnoticed
❤3🔥3custom 53301210206888385932
Most privacy talk in crypto is about transactions. Nobody talks about privacy in DAOs—which collectively manage ~$20B We've dived into zero-knowledge voting, anti-collusion experiments, and DeXe's solution 👉 Read here
custom 53301210206888385934🔥3❤2
Run your DAO both on-chain and off-chain in one place 👉 app.dexe.io
🔥5custom 53301210206888385933
🎄Happy New Year! 🍾
❤2custom 53301210206888385932
🤖AI is quietly strengthening DAO governance in 2025 Some moves we’re actually seeing: - AI tools are spotting malicious proposals earlier and flagging repeat bad actors - DAOs are using AI for analysis and filtering, while humans stay in charge of final decisions - Developer activity around DAO tooling jumped 65% last year, accelerating AI-native governance workflows This isn’t some dystopian takeover. AI isn’t rep…
❤2
🎄 Merry Christmas, DeXers! 🎄
❤1
🟢DAO governance continues to evolve in 2025, with 50K+ DAOs now collectively managing more than $15 billion in assets Here’s what we’re seeing 👇 - 50%+ of all treasury capital is held by TOP-5 DAOs (each managing $500M+), strengthening their positions and experimenting with new governance models - Low participation (avg. 15–25%) is improving thanks to delegation and reputation systems - Proposal overload is easing w…
❤2🔥2custom 53301210206888385932
💰 $DEXE is now trading on Bithumb 💰 You can trade $DEXE with ZERO FEE till 22.12.2025 01:00 UTC 👉 https://bithumb.com/react/trade/order/DEXE-KRW Read a full announcement with details here
❤7custom 53301210206888385933🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dexe_network. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 348,521 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeXe Protocol - Announcements” (@Dexe_network), 7,434 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dexe_network.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.