5 measurements spanning 18 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,614–1,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 12:46
1,616
+2
20 Aug 2026, 09:52
1,614
-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:33
1,616
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:35
1,617
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:05
1,617
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.2%
avg views ÷ 1,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
715
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (13 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
7,860
Reactions total
193
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
419 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
164
39.1%
👍
159
37.9%
🤡
64
15.3%
👎
24
5.73%
⚡
5
1.19%
😱
2
0.477%
😎
1
0.239%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 419reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дуже давно дивлюсь сім'ю конференцій FWDays.
Сам би хотів виступити колись на ній, але поки не виходить. Втім 3 жовтня в Києві вони проводять офлайн івент де за один день покриють:
- AI & Agentic Engineering
- Software Architecture
- Frontend / JavaScript
- Tech Leadership / Management
Більше 30 доповідей.
Так: доведеться обирати на все попасти без маховіка часу не вийде.
Усі деталі та квитки: https://bit.ly/4xpo2I…
https://youtube.com/live/B7wlzPAMUjM
Завтра о 8 вечора по Київу буду вживу писати in-memory індекси: гарна штука і один раз виручила мене дуже сильно, дозволивши оптимізувати функцію програми з 3 годин, до 1.6секунди, що геть змінило весь підхід: то що було джобою, що запускалось раз на місяць, стало ріал-тайм дашбордом.
Воно б і 3 години теоретично влаштовували б, бо це ж раз на місяць... Але можливість робити облік…
Наступний стрім буде AI-Free. Я його так довго планував, що за цей чат встиг вийти ChatGPT і все що сталось після цього.
І от подумав згадати: як ото код руками писати. Повністю.
Ух воно і повільно по відчуттям. Особливо на перших етапах.
Думаю тепер: чи це воно так завжди було, чи це я так втратив навичку мануальної кодопісі за... ..ну щось до року.
Дуже дивні відчуття насправді... ...поряд з осознаванням того що …
Пам'ятайте було дуже довге відео де я до байту показував як розкладені об'єкти CLR в пам'яті?
Точно все згадати можете? Якщо ні, то от нагадую у НОВОМУ відео де я спробував пояснити все максимально коротко і лаконічно (90 секунд)
https://youtu.be/zizaD4omVnU
Щось вже кілька разів на ютубі чув що Claude Code вийшов цієї зими.
Пам'ятав що це не так. Але після кількох повторів в незалежних один від одного відео поліз перевіряти:
Claude Code вийшов у лютому 2025. Не пів, а півтора роки тому.
До осені вже були copilot cli і Gemini cli і навіть cursor cli.
Все почало сильно рухатись цієї зими бо за рік інструменти набрали спроможностей щось робити і підтягнулись моделі: зок…
Я ніколи не чув ні кого хто був би не згоден з тим, що EF найбільш розвинута ORM. При чому навіть не тільки в дотНет світі, а і за його межами.
Втім базова ідея настільки складна і амбіційна, що і досі закриваємо деякі штуки, що можна написати в expressions і можна б було транслювати в SQL, якщо добряче подумати, але не виходило раніше.
Окрім цього є ще штуки в SQL які було не зрозуміло як виразити на EF, їх теж ме…
https://youtu.be/foF_5NcwdLI
Я щось і пропустив своє є відео на своєму каналі, а дарма: норм відео.
Робив колись великий стрім де з нуля в лайві блокчейн написав, але якщо вам треба просто вхопити базову ідею, щоб потім запрягти агента робити те що я скурпульозно робив сам, то вам буде достатньо цього:
https://youtu.be/foF_5NcwdLI
🔥6👍2🤡2
Signed Podkolzin Andrii
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DevJungles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dev Jungles” (@DevJungles), 1,616 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DevJungles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.