Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dev.log [ex-Comics]

@DevComics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,080subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550159826
TypeChannel
Username@DevComics
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DevComics

Growth

1,0801,0831,081.57 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,080 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,080–1,083 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:041,080-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:361,082-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:011,083no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:181,083first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

302 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11538.1%
😁10133.4%
custom 5460655466340163557237.62%
custom 5436159743137696554206.62%
134.30%
🎄92.98%
custom 524724521578110801482.65%
👾41.32%
custom 524489624662731731530.993%
🍌30.993%
🤡30.993%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Feb 2026, 05:05 UTC802 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тесты и вот это все Если вы, как и я, не ведете разработку по TDD, то рано или поздно приходят эти ребята 😅 Вчера начал писать тесты для xlea (вы же читали статью, правда? Правда же..?😒). Думаю, многим знакомо это чувство Нужно писать тесты, но совсем не хочется, но ты себя заставляешь, а потом такой…. 😫Блин, а еще вот этот кейс можно добавить. 😫О, а вот тут еще вот эту часть протестить. 😫Ого, оказывается тут был

8custom 52448962466273173153custom 52472452157811080143

1 Feb 2026, 09:15 UTC719 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Чуть подробнее и на Хабре: https://habr.com/ru/articles/991462/

6custom 54361597431376965546

31 Jan 2026, 07:17 UTC779 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Звезды приветствуются❤️ https://github.com/artanador/xlea

2

31 Jan 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,010 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это я, пишу xlea Ну что, меня можно поздравить с первой библиотекой на pypi!🥳 Ну как с первой… с первой, которую я придумал и написал с нуля, а не обертка над чужим api. ▶️Как пришла идея На работе я постоянно пишу приложения, которые читают excel файлы. С каждым разом я совершенствовал подход так, чтобы это выглядело более читаемым и легко поддерживаемым. Буквально на прошлой неделе на ревью кода я понял, что оч

13

27 Jan 2026, 18:24 UTC720 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вайб кодинг🤨 Все больше и больше это явление заходит в нашу жизнь. Так или иначе. И я, на самом деле, абсолютно не против того, чтобы кодить с помощью нейронки, это сильно упрощает жизнь. Но, все это хорошо, если кодер понимает, что на самом деле делает сгенерированный код и может его разобрать на кусочки. Ну то есть, к примеру, я лично генерю чаще всего то, что влом писать. И всегда переписываю тот код, который в

19custom 54361597431376965547custom 54606554663401635575👾1🤡1

26 Jan 2026, 18:22 UTC668 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Буквально я😀 Всем привет, дорогие подписчики. Да, это я - админ этого канала, спустя больше трех месяцев тишины решил наконец написать сюда😬 Во-первых, давайте знакомиться: Меня зовут Артем, мне кхкххдцать пять лет, и я работаю в конторе апчхителеком на позиции Team Lead Python разработчиков. Эту должность я только что придумал сам, потому что я так чувствую (прям как Олег Тиньков) и мне ничего за это не будет 🤷‍♂️

31custom 54361597431376965545🤡1

31 Dec 2025, 19:17 UTC866 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всех с Наступающим и Наступившим!🎄

13🎄9custom 52472452157811080142🍌1

18 Oct 2025, 05:07 UTC≈1,480 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FrimStripPhoto

Типичный IT проект | Inktober #17 Украшенный

😁265👾3

16 Oct 2025, 05:05 UTC≈1,250 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все мы немного коты автор: неТотКот @DevComics

😁11🤡1

15 Oct 2025, 16:09 UTC≈1,130 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И еще версия подписчика @proggerx автор: SarahAndersen @DevComics

7

15 Oct 2025, 15:50 UTC872 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Версия подписчика @mikarmk автор: SarahAndersen @DevComics

😁144

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DevComics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 542,407 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dev.log [ex-Comics]” (@DevComics), 1,080 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DevComics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.