6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +4,697. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,027–63,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:01
62,429
+98
15 Sept 2026, 15:38
62,331
+413
14 Sept 2026, 02:01
61,918
+462
12 Sept 2026, 09:57
61,456
+1,041
10 Sept 2026, 09:38
60,415
+2,683
7 Sept 2026, 12:22
57,732
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 1 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.7%
avg views ÷ 62,429 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,300
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
80 (1 September 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,782,976
Reactions total
57,414
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
280
Videos
5
Links
41
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
57,414 reactions across 80 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
8,296
14.4%
🥰
8,241
14.4%
❤
7,969
13.9%
🔥
7,302
12.7%
🤯
6,957
12.1%
🐳
6,946
12.1%
🏆
6,336
11.0%
⚡
5,367
9.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,545
across the posts below
Posts paid on
76
of 80 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
54
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Desk_Moon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 September 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💵 Binance invests $100M in Circle
💰Binance has invested $100 million in Circle, the company behind 💰 USDC, while the two firms expand their partnership under a new five-year agreement.
As part of the deal, Binance will further promote and expand access to USDC across its platform, while Circle will provide monthly incentive payments tied to USDC held through its infrastructure.
The deal significantly strengthens t…
🧐 #BTC Market Update
For the first time this year, 💰BTC has printed a higher high, breaking the previous bearish sequence. That’s the first real sign that market structure may be shifting back in favor of buyers. 📈
The cleaner setup from here would be a pullback that forms a higher low. That could offer a much better entry than chasing price after the breakout.
Already holding BTC? Sometimes the best trade is simp…
🟢 Crypto’s total market value jumped by $160 billion in just 24 hours.
💰#BTC is pushing higher, and much of the altcoin market is coming along for the ride. Plenty of green on the board. 📈
Saudi Arabia Steps Back From mBridge
The kingdom has ended active participation in the China-led blockchain payments project, which enables cross-border digital-currency transfers with less reliance on the U.S. dollar.
One important detail: the withdrawal happened in 2025, after Saudi Arabia completed its pilot, but is only now being reported. 👀
Binance Wallet Opens the Door to Pre-IPO Exposure 👀
Together with 💰PancakeSwap, 💰Binance Wallet is introducing Pre-Access, offering tokenized exposure to private companies before a potential public listing. The first company will be revealed soon.
And yes, Alpha Points are involved again. Allocations also depend on your bStocks tier and Trencher Badge status. 🎯
The appeal? Getting exposure before the public-market…
Anthropic Weighs a New Claude Release as Competition Intensifies 🤖
Anthropic is reportedly considering a fresh Claude model to challenge OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra as it gains traction with business users.
The timing stands out: just days earlier, Dario Amodei urged the industry to slow advances in AI capabilities to give safety concerns more attention.
Meanwhile, Anthropic is reportedly targeting a November stock-marke…
#BTC: Is $83K the Next Stop? 👀
The market keeps climbing, with squeezed shorts adding fuel to the rally. Another $500M in liquidations over the past 24 hours. August and September have been relentless for traders betting against the move.
There’s no shortage of setups either, from quick scalping trades to Privacy, L2, and RWA plays. Plenty of opportunities, but being selective still beats chasing every green candle…
#ZKP Bullish! 📈
Opened a spot long here. The risk/reward near $0.042 caught my attention, so I’m taking a shot. Looking for $0.052 first, then taking it one target at a time. If price hits $0.037, I’m out rather than sitting around hoping for a recovery.
📊 Trade Setup:
• Watch Zone: Buy #ZKP on Binance or any other exchange $0.042 – $0.046
• Targets: $0.052 → $0.059 → $0.068 → $0.080
• Stop Loss: $0.037
🔥📈 Bitcoin pushes past $81,000!
Breaking through is one thing. Holding above it is the next test. Watching whether BTC builds on this move or slips back below the level. 👀
❤379🔥101🏆72🤯65🐳42👍28🥰28⚡9
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @Desk_Moon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Desk_Moon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 September 2026
Most recent edit
12 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MoonDesk” (@Desk_Moon), 62,429 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Desk_Moon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
