Инфографика для маркетплейса.
Создание нейровидео для бренда , нейрообложки.
Оформление сообщества вконтакте и др.
Проведу анализ, создам воронку.
Помогу выделиться от конкурентов, пишите @olga_lop
Портфолио 👇 https://ru.pinterest.com/DesingMP_Wb_Ozon/
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 294–296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:05
295
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:24
295
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.2%
avg views ÷ 295 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
51.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held
11 (18 June 2026 – 17 July 2026)
Views total
172
Reactions total
88
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
400
Videos
21
Links
107
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
27s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
530 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
187
35.3%
🔥
141
26.6%
👍
102
19.2%
👏
24
4.53%
🥰
24
4.53%
🤩
18
3.40%
⚡
15
2.83%
😁
12
2.26%
custom 5361964771509808811
6
1.13%
💯
1
0.189%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ Нейровидео для Ozon — наша мицеллярная водичка 💧
Успела доделать перед отпуском ❤️
Остальные работы покажу сразу после 4 августа.
Спасибо, что вы со мной 🌸
До связи!
#нейровидео #анимация #анимацияобложки #нейровидеоМП #нейровидео_для_бренда
💧 Друзья, как и обещала!
Показываю вам инфографику на нашу новую мицеллярную воду — результат кропотливой работы над визуалом, текстом и смыслами.
На слайдах — вся суть продукта:
✅бережная формула BIOME PROTECTION с ниацинамидом, инулином и гиалуронкой
✅удобный формат с помпой (никаких переворотов и луж!)
✅клинически протестированный состав для кожи вокруг глаз и губ
✅и, конечно, наш фирменный hydro balance — 0…
Всем привет! 🤍
Помните ту историю с эпилятором, которую я вам показывала? (Фон тогда был розовым мрамором, вы заценили 😏)
Так вот — мы с клиентом решили не останавливаться на обычных фото и запилить к нему НЕЙРОВИДЕО! Представьте: тот самый эстетичный мрамор, классный свет, а вокруг ещё и нейросеточка постаралась, добавила магии. Сейчас всё будет красиво и залипательно ✨
Смотрите видос, мне прям интересно ваше мне…
Я — коллекционер сертификатов 😂
Шучу. Но вот этот красавчик вчера чуть не потерялся в галерее.
Это сертификат от Ярослава по топовой инфографике.
А теперь цифры:
📌 2 года
📌 7 сертификатов
📌 2 курса без сертификатов (нейровидео и подиумная инфографика)
Почему я продолжаю учиться?
Потому что дизайн не стоит на месте. И я — тоже.
А вы любите получать новые знания или уже нашли свою зону комфорта и не выходите из н…
Мой финальный проект на курсе у Ярослава Твердова WildSpace 🥥
Друзья, встречайте! Это моя итоговая работа — упаковка и презентационные слайды для кокосового молока.
Я выбрала этот продукт, потому что он универсален: его любят и бариста, и повара, и сыроеды. Но главная задача была — показать эту «универсальность» визуально, без скучных таблиц.
Почему мне кажется, что работа получилась классной?
Фокус на структуре.…
Всем приветики! 💛
Сегодня покажу вам не просто работу, а настоящую историю выживания во флюиде))
Помните, я писала, что попала в больницу и неделю восстанавливалась? Так вот, в этот момент один из моих проектов буквально горел. У меня было готово только «лицо» — обложка и один слайд, а нужно было еще 4!
Я сотрудничаю с агентством и очень дорожу постоянным клиентом (тем самым, с «Золотым яблоком», пенкой и энзимной…
ДВОЙНАЯ ПРЕМЬЕРА 🔥 Кейс, который сбежал от меня
Друзья, помните обложку, которую выбрал клиент для эпилятора? Я думала, что на этом история с оформлением закрыта. Но пока я неторопливо собирала для вас воронку, клиент не сидел на месте!
Решил сделать тестовый СТР — и родилась новая обложка. Теперь у нас их две.
Главное же — я наконец сложила для вас полную воронку. Без воды, по делу. Посмотрите, как глубоко я разо…
Идеальный план на выходные? Не сработало 🤡
Делюсь с вами своими приключениями, правда, с опозданием на 10 дней. Решила, что грех не рассказать, как я «культурно» провела время 😅
Суббота прошла просто шикарно:
✔️ Немного поработала (буквально пару часиков, чтобы совесть была чиста).
✔️ Рванула с семьёй отдыхать в «Парк Арена»!
✔️ Было круто и душевно. Фоточки с того самого дня прилагаю — ловите настроение! ☀️
А вот…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🧐 КЕЙС: Эпилятор. 3 обложки — 1 победитель
Собрали три варианта обложки для фотоэпилятора KireiTech. Вроде товар один, инфо одна, но посмотрите, как по-разному можно разложить акценты.
Вариант 1 — база: БЕЗ БОЛИ, 999 999 вспышек, охлаждение. Кратко, ёмко, но без «вау-эффекта».
Вариант 2 — максимум: добавили 9 уровней мощности, 2 насадки, вращающуюся головку, премиальную упаковку и сумку для хранения. Прямо всё, чт…
🔥27❤15👍11⚡3👏1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @DesingMP_Wb_Ozon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Olga |Дизайн | Инфографика| Маркетплейсы | VK” (@DesingMP_Wb_Ozon), 295 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DesingMP_Wb_Ozon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.