Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,691–1,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:18
1,877
+5
7 Sept 2026, 14:01
1,872
+14
2 Sept 2026, 13:03
1,858
+14
30 Aug 2026, 07:34
1,844
+10
27 Aug 2026, 01:56
1,834
+21
23 Aug 2026, 18:16
1,813
+22
19 Aug 2026, 22:55
1,791
+47
16 Aug 2026, 21:18
1,744
+8
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
1,736
+5
10 Aug 2026, 10:31
1,731
+15
7 Aug 2026, 12:20
1,716
+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:46
1,715
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
304 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
259
85.2%
😭
26
8.55%
🙏
10
3.29%
😍
5
1.64%
🍓
1
0.329%
👍
1
0.329%
🔥
1
0.329%
🤔
1
0.329%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙 پادکست ۳
توضیحات تکمیلیِ منابع زبانشناسی و آزمونسازی
تو این پادکست راجع به این توضیح دادم که آیا باید منابع جدیدی به منابع قبلی زبانشناسی و آزمونسازی اضافه بشه یا نه.
📗 فصلهای Falk در کنکور ارشد (۱ - ۱ - ۵ - ۵ - ۱۸) و دکتری (۷ - ۱۸ - ۲۱)
📙 فصلهای Hudson در کنکور ارشد (۸ - ۸ - ۱۰ - ۱۰ - ۱۱ - ۱۴ - ۱۵ - ۲۰ - ۲۱) و دکتری (۱ - ۱۶ - ۲۳)
🔻 پادکست منابع آزمونسازی | لینک
🔻 پادکست منابع زبانشناسی | لینک
🔻 پادکست …
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
🔆💣 بودجهبندی سوالات درس زبانشناسی دکتری در شش سال اخیر (۱۴۰۰-۱۴۰۵)
🔺 همونطور که میبینید، Semantics با ۱۹ سوال پرتکرارترین فصل هست. البته توجه داشته باشید که از سال ۴۰۲ تیپ سوالها تغییر کرده. پس اگر تعداد سوالهای ۴۰۲ به بعد رو درنظر بگیرید دیگه Semantics اهمیت ویژهای نداره چون ۱۳ سوال از ۱۹ مربوط به قبل ۴۰۲ هست.
🔺نکته دوم تفاوت بودجه بندی آزمون ارشد و دکتری هست: مثلا فصلهای Language change و Language …
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
🔆💣 بودجهبندی سوالات درس آزمونسازی ارشد در شش سال اخیر (۱۴۰۰-۱۴۰۵)
🔺 بر اساس تعداد سوالها، مباحث آزمونسازی رو میشه به دو بخش تقسیم کرد. یه بخش شامل فصلهای Statistics, Test construction, Reliability/validity و بخش دیگه شامل همه فصلهای باقیمونده میشه. همونطور که میبینید در مجموع شش سال از هر کدوم از سه فصل بخش اول بیش از ۲۰ سوال اومده، اما در مقابل تعداد سوالهای هیچ کدوم از فصلهای بخش دوم حتی دو رقمی ه…
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
🔆💣 بودجهبندی سوالات درس زبانشناسی ارشد در شش سال اخیر (۱۴۰۰-۱۴۰۵)
🔺 سال ۹۹ رو از بودجهبندی حذف کردم تا تصویر دقیقتری نسبت به اهمیت سرفصلها از نظر طراح فعلی داشته باشیم. همونطور که میببنید در این چند سال فصلهای Language change و Language in society جای Semantics و Syntax رو گرفتن و با اختلاف نسبتا زیاد از بقیه مباحث جلوتر هستن. بنابراین به نظر میاد داوطلبها این دو فصل رو باید بیشتر جدی بگیرن و اونها …
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
📣 موقت | خبر
اینفوگرافی آزمون ارشد
البته رئیس سنجش گفته نتایج نهایی نیمه اول مهر اعلام میشه:
در ادامه بازدید از حوزه برگزاری آزمون کارشناسی ارشد ناپیوسته سال 1405 رئیس سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور دکتر رضا محمدی در خصوص زمان اعلام نتایج این آزمون گفت: در تلاش هستیم نتایج اولیه آزمون کارشناسی ارشد ناپیوسته سال 1405 را اواخر مرداد ماه اعلام کرده و پس از آن، برای متقاضیانی که حد نصاب نمره لازم را کسب کرده و مجاز ب…
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
📣 موقت | خبر
رئیس سازمان سنجش گفت: سازمان سنجش در اوایل مرداد ماه در اولین فرصتی که نتایج دانشگاه به صورت کامل به سنجش اعلام شود نتایج آزمون دکتری سال ۱۴۰۵ را اعلام خواهد کرد. بنابراین نتایج نهایی در نیمه اول مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۵ اعلام خواهد شد — به نقل از خبرگزاری مهر
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
📊✏️ بررسی و تحلیل سوالات زبانشناسی کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵
دوستان عزیز سلام 👋
✔️ همون طراح قبلی
✔️ عرض اندام Hudson و Falk با ۹ سوال
✔️ یک سوال غلط
✔️ یک سوال خارج از منبع
✔️ دو سوال از glosssry فرامکین
با وجود تکراری بودن منابع و موضوعات، از اونجایی که سوالها ابعاد جدیدی از این موضوعات رو مورد پرسش قرار داده بودن، فضای سوالات جدید شده بود و این باعث شد پاسخگویی به سوالها سخت بشه. در مجموع کساییکه به ۱۰ تا ۱۲ س…
موقت | نحوه محاسبه درصد
پ.ن. برای عمومی (۵۰ سوال) و تخصصی (۵۰ سوال) باید جداگانه حساب کنید.
کنارتون هستم ... 🩶😊
لینک کانال در بله 👇
https://ble.ir/DerakhsheshTEFLprep
------------------------------------------
📱TEFL Admission Prep
🔗 @DerakhsheshTEFLprep
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
🌟📋 پاسخنامه سوالات آزمونسازی کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵
درود به همگی 👋
کلید اولیه و پاسخ تشریحی بخش آزمونسازی ارشد رو خدمتتون ارسال میکنم.
📘 پراکندگی سوالات
هیتن (۱۹۹۰): ۶ سوال
جیمز دین براون (۱۹۹۶): ۴ سوال
فجب : ۴ سوال
مدسن (۱۹۸۳): ۱ سوال
⚠️ دقیقا مثل زبانشناسی یک سوال غلط هست اما جواب داره!!! و منبع یک سوال رو پیدا نکردم 😉
✅ کامبک واقعی رو Heaton زد بعد حدود ۱۰ سال با ۶ سوال. آرژانتین تو بازی با مصر و انگلیس …
⚫️🟠
⚪️🟡
🌟📋 پاسخنامه سوالات زبانشناسی کنکور ارشد ۱۴۰۵
درود به همگی 😊
کلید اولیه و پاسخ تشریحی بخش زبانشناسی آزمون ارشد رو خدمتتون ارسال میکنم.
📘 پراکندگی سوالات
فرامکین (۲۰۱۴): ۶ سوال
هادسن (۲۰۰۰): ۶ سوال
فالک (۱۹۷۸): ۳ سوال
یول (۲۰۱۴): ۱ سوال
⚠️ تنها سوالی که از کتاب یول طرح شده غلط هست اما جواب داره!!! و منبع یک سوال رو پیدا نکردم.
⚠️ انقدر سوال 60 عجیبه با اینکه منبعشو پیدا کردم اما از گزینه ای که انتخاب کر…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @DerakhsheshTEFLprep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DerakhsheshTEFLprep named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@derakhshesht named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🎓آموزش تحقیق دانشگاهی🎓 @Research_Q1 · 33,207 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ali Derakhshesh l علی درخشش” (@DerakhsheshTEFLprep), 1,877 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DerakhsheshTEFLprep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
