https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085982326450774055?s=52
❤2

Channel
@DeputeCarlosBilongo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Declared links · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
311subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001647943842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeputeCarlosBilongo |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeputeCarlosBilongo |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 311 | +3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 308 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 307 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 305 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 309 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 305 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 300 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 301 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 301 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 38.2% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 34.2% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 19.7% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 7.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085982326450774055?s=52
❤2
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085967751869333691?s=46
❤2
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085845873926275541?s=52
❤2
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085831409168457749?s=52
❤1
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085774584008016288?s=52
👍2
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085653901194170444?s=52
👍3
𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗽 ! 🛑 𝗔𝗿𝗿𝗲̂𝘁𝗲𝘇 𝗱𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿 𝗮𝘂𝘅 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰̧𝗮𝗶𝘀… Comme d’habitude, le RN agite les peurs et construit un récit mensonger. Son obsession de l’immigration est son principal carburant électoral. Mais les Françaises et les Français ne sont pas dupes : en 2002, en 2017, en 2022 comme en 2024, ils ont fait barrage à l’extrême droite. En 2027, une Nouvelle Alliance Populaire et Antiraciste l’emportera. 📺 Retrouvez mon interv…
❤4🔥1
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085367607931150349?s=52
👍5
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2085296479871115362?s=46
❤4👍2
L’extreme droite instrumentalise Ceuta, tape sur le Premier ministre espagnol Sánchez mais laisse tranquille la Première ministre italienne Meloni, alors que l’Espagne et l’Italie ont tous les deux une politique de régularisation. N’en déplaise au Rassemblement National, il faut régulariser massivement les personnes sans papiers qui vivent et travaillent en France : d’abord par humanité et par respect de leur dignit…
❤5🔥1
https://twitter.com/bilongocarlos/status/2084931131703459850?s=46
🔥3
À Ceuta, plus de 70 personnes venant du Maroc sont mortes en voulant rejoindre l’enclave espagnole. C’est un drame humanitaire, pas une opportunité pour une surenchère raciste. L’internationale d’extrême droite hurle contre le Premier ministre espagnol Pedro Sánchez et sa réforme de régularisation exceptionnelle d’environ 500 000 personnes déjà présentes en Espagne, qui ne concerne pas les nouveaux arrivants, mais r…
❤4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DeputeCarlosBilongo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Carlos Martens Bilongo |
|---|---|
| Description | French politician (1990-) |
| X / Twitter | @BilongoCarlos |
| YouTube | UCiZTVr8GUvkRiiQWEwab7dQ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Actualités de Carlos Martens Bilongo” (@DeputeCarlosBilongo), 311 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeputeCarlosBilongo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.