if you still didn't join make sure to do so with rise.trade/invite/delta for instant access

Channel
DeltaBot Archive
@DeltaBotArchive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,710subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001623163767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeltaBotArchive |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 24 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeltaBotArchive |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,710 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,715 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 1,716 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,716 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.6%
- avg views ÷ 1,710 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 404
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.474%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 August 2022 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,825 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 42.7% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 33.9% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 7.26% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.84% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.03% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.23% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2022 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
gm lads week 2 points just were distributed :) did just over 5m vol this week and got enough points to put me at top 50 users i think that even with 1m vol you can get into top 250 its literally still so early, so dont worry and just keep trading normally, hopefully we're cooking with this one
💯1
week 1 points just dropped, hope you guys got a bunch FYI from what i saw on twitter and groupchats, farming activities are being monitored and they focus on giving points to actual organic traders and organic flows, so dont worry about doing something special, just trade as you normally would and youll do good
risex just dropped retro points for those who traded before epoch 1 started, congrats to anyone who got a bunch epoch 1 has 5 days to go so youre still super early on this one i feel like if you still didn't join make sure to do so with rise.trade/invite/delta for instant access
❤2
gm lads, just checked and got 20 new codes so can go ahead and try to register for those who couldnt yesterday
16 codes left, so make sure to join even if you want to trade later. I think they only add codes once a week or something, so I'll update if they run out
Heya lads RISEx just announced their points program today, it is live now and this will be the first week of points distribution I really think what they're doing is quite special, a fully onchain CLOB DEX built on Rise with <5ms latency really a CEX-like experience Been trading there for like a week or so and been really enjoying it This is not affiliated, I am not getting paid, this is really just me sharing with …
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥24❤5👏4💯2
https://www.getalphamail.co/interviews/60-deltaxbt An interview I had with Alpha Mail Really enjoyed answering all the questions and I hope it can help you guys somehow :)
❤9🔥7🥰1
https://deltaxbt.medium.com/the-art-of-patience-31749bbc8db1
🔥7👏2💯2❤1
https://deltaxbt.medium.com/leverage-a-double-edged-sword-9e1d9a65343f
👍3
https://deltaxbt.medium.com/look-back-and-plan-ahead-how-to-create-an-annual-trading-summary-and-a-plan-for-participating-in-5f719b1b58f0
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DeltaBotArchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,058,437 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DeltaBotArchive named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeltaBot Archive” (@DeltaBotArchive), 1,710 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeltaBotArchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.