Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
11.5 average views per post against 10,460 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.11%. Across the 808 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,060–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Hindi — the middle half sit between 3.97% and 15.1%, with a median of 8.46%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured
29 of 29 published in the window (29 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
333
Mature posts only
0.122% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 36 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,442–10,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:58
10,460
-2
16 Sept 2026, 17:19
10,462
-4
14 Sept 2026, 20:36
10,466
-1
13 Sept 2026, 09:02
10,467
-5
11 Sept 2026, 09:58
10,472
-11
8 Sept 2026, 12:55
10,483
-10
5 Sept 2026, 07:58
10,493
-5
3 Sept 2026, 11:57
10,498
+2
2 Sept 2026, 04:55
10,496
-6
1 Sept 2026, 02:15
10,502
-4
30 Aug 2026, 23:45
10,506
-3
29 Aug 2026, 23:07
10,509
-1
28 Aug 2026, 21:39
10,510
-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:16
10,512
-1
26 Aug 2026, 20:18
10,513
-8
25 Aug 2026, 21:32
10,521
-6
25 Aug 2026, 00:37
10,527
-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:06
10,531
-3
22 Aug 2026, 03:48
10,534
-6
20 Aug 2026, 21:47
10,540
first reading
Engagement
212 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.107%
avg views ÷ 10,460 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.2
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 212 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
212 (13 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
314
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Market me available ho gaye h englishproducts
STATIC GK HINDI 4 TH EDITION 👇👇
https://www.meesho.com/s/p/7i51tc?utm_source=share_9342808bf48e97b3eb2d79e4f9020006502161c0419e8d9d8424b978f81cda61
📚 Static GK MCQs — नए प्रश्न | Bilingual
1. भारत का सबसे ऊँचा जलप्रपात कौन-सा है?
Which is the highest waterfall in India?
A) जोग जलप्रपात / Jog Falls
B) कुंचिकल जलप्रपात / Kunchikal Falls
C) दूधसागर जलप्रपात / Dudhsagar Falls
D) शिवसमुद्रम / Shivanasamudra
✅ उत्तर / Answer: B) कुंचिकल जलप्रपात / Kunchikal Falls
2. भारत का सबसे बड़ा प्राकृतिक बंदरगाह कौन-सा है?
Which is the largest natural harbour in India?
A) चेन्…
Q. अंडर-20 विश्व कुश्ती चैंपियनशिप 2026 में भारतीय महिला कुश्ती दल ने कुल कितने पदक जीते? / How many total medals did the Indian women's wrestling team win at the U-20 World Wrestling Championships 2026?
4 पदक / 4 Medals0%
5 पदक / 5 Medals50%
6 पदक / 6 Medals0%
7 पदक / 7 Medals50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. भारत–वियतनाम तटरक्षक बल की 7वीं उच्च स्तरीय बैठक कहाँ आयोजित हुई? / Where was the 7th High-Level Meeting between the Indian and Vietnamese Coast Guards held?
नई दिल्ली / New Delhi0%
मुंबई / Mumbai50%
कोच्चि / Kochi0%
चेन्नई / Chennai50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. तियांगोंग अल्ट्रा रोबोट ने 100 मीटर दौड़ कितने समय में पूरी करके नया रिकॉर्ड बनाया? / In how much time did the Tiangong Ultra robot complete the 100-metre race to set a new record?
8.39 सेकंड / 8.39 Seconds50%
9.39 सेकंड / 9.39 Seconds0%
10.39 सेकंड / 10.39 Seconds0%
11.39 सेकंड / 11.39 Seconds50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q.अभिकथन (A): नवंबर 2025–मार्च 2026 के दौरान भारत के चावल निर्यात की मात्रा में वृद्धि हुई।
कारण (R): निर्यात की मात्रा तीन साल के औसत की तुलना में 5.6% अधिक रही।
A और R दोनों सही हैं तथा R, A की सही व्याख्या है।33%
A और R दोनों सही हैं, लेकिन R, A की सही व्याख्या नहीं है।33%
A सही है, लेकिन R गलत है।0%
A और R दोनों गलत हैं।33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. ‘मिशन समृद्ध गाँव’ योजना का शुभारंभ किसने किया? / Who launched the ‘Mission Samriddh Gaon’ scheme?
शिवराज सिंह चौहान / Shivraj Singh Chouhan50%
नरेंद्र सिंह तोमर / Narendra Singh Tomar0%
धर्मेंद्र प्रधान / Dharmendra Pradhan0%
मनसुख मांडविया / Mansukh Mandaviya50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @Delhi_uk_mp_judiciary_exam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 117 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Q. अंडर-20 विश्व कुश्ती चैंपियनशिप 2026 में भारतीय महिला कुश्ती दल ने कुल कितने पदक जीते? / How many total medals did the Indian women's wrestling team win at the U-20 World Wrestling Championships 2026?
4 पदक / 4 Medals0%
5 पदक / 5 Medals50%
6 पदक / 6 Medals0%
7 पदक / 7 Medals50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. भारत–वियतनाम तटरक्षक बल की 7वीं उच्च स्तरीय बैठक कहाँ आयोजित हुई? / Where was the 7th High-Level Meeting between the Indian and Vietnamese Coast Guards held?
नई दिल्ली / New Delhi0%
मुंबई / Mumbai50%
कोच्चि / Kochi0%
चेन्नई / Chennai50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Q. ऑपरेशन इकोनॉमिक आउटकास्ट की शुरुआत किस देश ने की? / Which country launched Operation Economic Outcast?
ब्रिटेन / United Kingdom33%
फ्रांस / France0%
अमेरिका / United States67%
जर्मनी / Germany0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto memes Hub™ @Crypto_memes_hub · 121,874 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
परीक्षागढ़ @parikshagarh · 120,060 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Delhi uk mp judiciary exam” (@Delhi_uk_mp_judiciary_exam), 10,460 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Delhi_uk_mp_judiciary_exam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
