Channel
@Dejban_Academy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,507subscribers
+99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002672467490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dejban_Academy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dejban_Academy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 1,507 | +106 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,401 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,410 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,407 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,408 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,583 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
82 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 39.0% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 28.0% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 14.6% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 9.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 8.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ آپدیت کارا! 🖥 بعد از چند ماهی که از ج/نگ میگذره، دوباره کارها افتاده روی روال و همهچیز دقیقاً طبق برنامه داره پیش میره. 💀 پس باشید پای کار، بهزودی منتظر دفتر آکادمی دژبان در تهران باشید. 😎 🟩 فصل جدیدی از کارا شروع کردیم... 🍻 369 👑
❤🔥7❤1🔥1
Signed 369
رفقا امروز نزدیک ۱۰۰ تا لایسنس پخش کردم صبر کنید بقیه رفقا هم دارم اکی میکنم 🍻 اینجوری یخوردع سخت شده به زودی اکانت پشتیبانی دژبان ساخته میشه یه ادمین جدا برای این کارا گذاشته میشه حجم پیام ها بالاس رفقا شرمنده اگه دیر جواب میدم ❤️
❤5👍3
Signed 369
من یه دوره خصوصی تست نفوذ سیستم های صنعتی دارم اگر به این حوزه علاقهمندید، پیام بدید؛ با تخفیف ویژه به دوره اضافهتون میکنم. 🖥 @CyberDevil9 💀 هر 3 4 ماه یه بار یه چند نفر ورودی باز میکنم برای این دوره در کل دوره جالبیه برای کسایی که علاقه دارن به فضای سیستم های صنعتی
👍3
Signed 369
به تست نفوذ سیستم های صنعتی علاقه دارید ؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed 369
🎤 ویس تحلیل کوتاه 🖥 اخیراً بیش از 30 سامانه آبرسانی در آمریکا هدف حمله سایبری قرار گرفتن؛ حملهای که نشون میده یک دسترسی ریموت ناامن چطور میتونه به سیستمهای صنعتی و زیرساختهای حیاتی برسه. 🟩 توی این ویس کوتاه، ماجرای حمله و بخش فنی اون رو بررسی کردم. ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ 🟢 #حمله_سایبری #سیستم_صنعتی 🖥 آکادمی دژبان ⏬ 🟢 @Dejban_Academy 🟢 mr369.ir
Signed 369
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ امروز میخوام یه تحلیل کوتاه خوب بریم روش داخل چنل 💀
🔥3
Signed 369
خبری که این چند روزه در اومده که میگن ایران در میشیگان 9 سامانه آبرسانی هدف حمله سایبری قرار داده شنیدید؟
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed 369
💀 اجرای دستور CMD با Arduino Pro Micro یکی از قابلیتهای جالب Arduino Pro Micro اینه که بهخاطر داشتن چیپ ATmega32U4 میتونه خودش رو بهعنوان USB Keyboard به کامپیوتر معرفی کنه. 🖥 یعنی میتونیم با کدنویسی کاری کنیم که کامپیوتر فکر کنه یک کیبورد واقعی بهش وصل شده و مثلاً CMD رو باز کنه و یک دستور ساده اجرا بشه. 🟩 📌 کد نمونه: #include <Keyboard.h> void setup() { Keyboard.begin(); delay(2000); Keyboard.press(…
👍4🥰2
Signed 369
💀 سخت افزارArduino 💀 بعضی مدلهای آردوینو که قابلیت USB HID دارن، میتونن برای پروژههایی استفاده بشن که سیستم اونها رو مثل کیبورد USB شناسایی کنه. 🟢 یعنی ایده کلی شبیه Rubber Ducky میشه: ⏬ Arduino → USB HID → Keyboard Input ⚙️ 🟢 البته همه مدلهای Arduino قابلیت HID مستقیم ندارن؛ مدل برد خیلی مهمه. یه نمونه از کد های Arduino براتون میزارم الان ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ 🟢 #سخت_افزار #Rubber_Ducky 🖥 آکادمی دژبان ⏬ 🟢 @Dejb…
🥰3🔥1
Signed 369
🖥 چرا هکرها ابزارهایی مثل Rubber Ducky دوست دارن؟ چون سادهست، کوچیکه و ظاهرش اصلاً عجیب نیست. 🟢 یه هکر توی سناریوی دسترسی فیزیکی میتونه از یه ابزار HID برای بررسی این موضوع استفاده کنه که: ⏬ 👁 سیستم چه دستگاههایی رو قبول میکنه؟ 👁 کاربر چقدر حواسش به USBهای ناشناسه؟ 👁 سیستم چقدر در برابر دستگاههای HID جدید مقاومه؟ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ 🟢 #سخت_افزار #Rubber_Ducky 🖥 آکادمی دژبان ⏬ 🟢 @Dejban_Academy 🟢 mr369.ir
Signed 369
🖥 این Rubber Ducky چطوری سیستم رو گول میزنه؟ یه نکته باحال درباره این ابزار هکری وجود داره. وقتی وصلش میکنی، سیستم ممکنه بگه: ⏬ «اوکی، یه کیبورد جدید وصل شد.» ✅ و همینجا قضیه جالب میشه. این Rubber Duckyمیتونه ورودیهای کیبورد رو بهصورت خودکار ارسال کنه. پس هکر لازم نیست همهچیز رو دستی تایپ کنه. 🌀 🔅 کل ایده روی یه قابلیت ساده ولی قدرتمند بنا شده: سیستم به دستگاه اعتماد میکنه چون فکر میکنه یه کیبورده. ال…
🔥3
Signed 369
💀 این فلش نیست! یه کیبورد کوچیکه 😈 ظاهرش؟ یه USB معمولی. ✅ 💀 ولی وقتی وصلش میکنی، سیستم میتونه بشناسدش بهعنوان کیبورد (HID). یعنی چی؟ ⏬ یعنی بهجای اینکه فقط فایل جابهجا کنه، میتونه ورودیهای کیبورد رو خیلی سریع و خودکار بفرسته. هکر میتونه از چنین ابزاری توی سناریوهای حمله فیزیکی سوءاستفاده کنه؛ البته همین ابزار توی تست نفوذ و آموزش هک هم کاربرد داره. ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ 🟢 #سخت_افزار 🖥 آکادمی دژبان ⏬ 🟢 @Dejba…
🥰3
Signed 369
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dejban_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به تست نفوذ سیستم های صنعتی علاقه دارید ؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خبری که این چند روزه در اومده که میگن ایران در میشیگان 9 سامانه آبرسانی هدف حمله سایبری قرار داده شنیدید؟
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
کدوم ابزار برای تحلیل فایلهای PCAP ساخته شده؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 252,726 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی دژبان” (@Dejban_Academy), 1,507 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dejban_Academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.