Channel
@DegenerateFinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001461411178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DegenerateFinance |
| Description | Degenerate Finance, known as DeFi. Contacts: @pepedegen |
| Created | 6 August 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DegenerateFinance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 72 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 72 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 6 August 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The following post is just a subjective copypasta of conversation with Anton Bukov and Sergej Kunz from 1inch.exchange team that took place in LobsterDAO chat. I've tried to cut off the flood and edit some messages to make this post as readable as possible. If you think, that something important is missing from the original conversation, please contact me and I will add it. If you took part in this conversation and d…
1inch's UI doesn't show correct APY calculations. Someone with 44% of WBTC pool forgot to stake LP-tokens.
It turned out that there will be a separate pool of rewards for each pair. So here's a new calculation with updated data.
1inch token farming starts tomorrow 0:00 UTC. Current APY is sweet. TVL will change significantly after launch.
Cover Protocol launched token and started shield mining program. Current average APYs are ~6000% for CLAIM tokens and ~1000% for NOCLAIM tokens. 1. Mint CLAIM and NOCLAIM tokens from DAI; 2. Add liquidity to Balancer CLAIM/DAI and NOCLAIM/DAI pairs; 3. Stake BPT.
In gratitude for subscribing to this silent channel, I would like to share the most valuable tool for consuming information and content. It is a news feeds aggregator called Inoreader. With it, you can: - aggregate RSS feeds; - aggregate email subscriptions in; - aggregate feed of any social network (Twitter, Medium, Substack, or any other site, blog, or forum); - set filters and notifications for specific words and…
$YFT price is $60. Capital started to exit from Balancer pools. First image source: @banteg
yft.finance: another fork of $YFI, day 3 Besides previous forks of $YFI, this has some innovations: working Aragon DAO and a good landing page with detailed information for degenerate farmers. The main tokenomic difference from $YFI and other forks is that there are only Balancer pool tokens for staking. Because of this newcomers pay to early farmers. It creates a pyramidal economy. Those who come out last will los…
Channel created
Channel photo updated
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @DegenerateFinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeFi for Degens” (@DegenerateFinance), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DegenerateFinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.