5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,569–9,698 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 08:12
9,584
-51
9 Aug 2026, 05:01
9,635
-46
6 Aug 2026, 11:20
9,681
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:16
9,683
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:53
9,683
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 9,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,640
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
24 (19 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
63,241
Reactions total
1,112
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
4
Videos
69
Links
118
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
41m 31s
Average length
3m 28s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,112 reactions across 24 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
244
21.9%
👍
195
17.5%
💯
154
13.8%
😈
90
8.09%
🔥
87
7.82%
👎
75
6.74%
🤔
58
5.22%
🙏
33
2.97%
👀
32
2.88%
🤬
30
2.70%
💩
21
1.89%
😱
17
1.53%
🥱
16
1.44%
👏
14
1.26%
😁
10
0.899%
🤯
9
0.809%
🎉
8
0.719%
🤣
8
0.719%
🤡
5
0.45%
⚡
3
0.27%
1 further kind
3
0.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Remember when they openly admitted the entire point of mass immigration was to make America less white?
Tucker: “The immigration project is a demographic project.”
“It has almost explicitly been an effort to make America less white.”
“A non-majority white country.”
Peter: “Jewish activist Earl Raab said it out loud: mass non-white immigration so a ‘neo-Nazi’ (white-aware) party can never rise.”
“Teddy Kennedy…
David Sinclair on Joe Rogan Podcast - “If a 92-year-old could be 25 again, would you have sex with them?”
SINCLAIR: “Yes… imagine how much they know.”
Then it gets even crazier:
“That day will come where you will not be able to tell how old somebody is by looking at them. You’ll have to do a test for these genes.”
“People still get grossed out by old rich guys with young wives… but what if he looked 20?”
“When w…
Axon cameras are quickly replacing Flock cameras faster than imagined.
These cameras are AI-powered license plate readers and live-streaming surveillance cameras built directly into existing streetlights.
Join Ezra A. Cohen
⚠️DISCOVER THE GENIUS WAVE- A GROUNDBREAKING INNOVATION!!🧠
❗️Have you heard about the Genius Wave (ThetaWave)? Probably not, because mainstream media wants to keep it hidden. They want you to stay poor and unhealthy. But here's your chance to break free!
The Genius Wave is a revolutionary discovery developed by a team of doctors and NASA scientists. It's changing lives around the world!
This is your opportunity to…
Pete Buttigieg just dropped this:
Trump started a war to distract from Epstein and rising prices.
“There was a moment where it seemed to him that he was better off politically if we were at war… even though he promised that we wouldn’t be.”
“He was under a lot of heat over cost of living, over the Epstein files, which was dominating the conversation every day, being proven to be as connected to an infamous pedophil…
Tucker Carlson:
“Bill Gates knows that he’ll never face justice in this life.”
“No matter how many times he is exposed for what he is… an enemy of our civilization, he faces no penalty at all.”
“There’s no one in power who wouldn’t be happy to have him over for dinner and then brag to their friends: ‘I had dinner with Bill Gates.’”
“It’s good to be Bill Gates… and it shouldn’t be.”
Join » DefiantGhost ✅️
Joe Rogan is horrified as Annie Jacobson reveals never-before-reported details about an Al-Qaeda bioweapons plot that almost created airborne rabies:
CONTEXT: Aafia Siddiqui was an MIT-trained biologist, related by marriage to 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and the first woman on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list. She is now locked in a Texas mental institution for life.
JACOBSON: “In her handbag, she …
The Fauci hearing just got weirder. Joe Rogan reacts to him taking the Fifth on everything — and the emails that prove the cover-up:
CONTEXT: Fauci is currently testifying before Congress and has a never-before-seen 10-year blanket pardon protecting him from any crimes he may have committed.
ROGAN: “He is now testifying in front of Congress and pleading the fifth about everything, including the color of his tie. It…
There’s a hidden brainwave inside you that silently shapes what you attract — success, ideas, luck… or the lack of it.
Researchers recently discovered this rare frequency, now called The Genius Wave — a pattern that only appears during sudden breakthroughs and moments of impossible luck.
The wild part?
You can activate it yourself in 7 seconds.
Once triggered, people report:
✨ Opportunities appearing out of nowher…
This clip dropped right before Fauci’s Senate hearing.
Makes you wonder if Jim Erdman’s testimony on Tucker Carlson was the final straw that forced him to show up under subpoena.
Join » DefiantGhost ✅️
Fauci’s paper. Fauci’s experts. Fauci’s narrative.
A just-retired CIA Agent Jim Erdman just confirmed it on Tucker:
“It was a lab incident in Wuhan.”
“I’m convinced the intelligence community could have made a pretty sound assessment by mid-2020 that there was a significant chance this was some variety of lab incident.”
“Anthony Fauci was fully aware that the funding for dangerous gain-of-function research had be…
💯37❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @DefiantGhost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,206 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defiant Ghost” (@DefiantGhost), 9,584 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DefiantGhost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.