Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DefiWhale

@DefiWhaleVC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

951subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002017966015
TypeChannel
Username@DefiWhaleVC
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DefiWhaleVC

Growth

9517 Aug 2026, 17:12 — 951 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:49 — 951 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:128 Aug 2026, 00:49
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 950–952 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 00:49951no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:12951first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
21
Videos
4
Links
56

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5735.4%
🔥2918.0%
😁1911.8%
🤣159.32%
👍138.07%
🤔63.73%
🤯63.73%
🍾53.11%
🙏42.48%
👏21.24%
👎10.621%
💯10.621%
😭10.621%
🤝10.621%
🥰10.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 05:40 UTC417 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

quite interesting because did similar observation, its a wierd market now. AI is taking alot of the VC money but I think AI also peaked soon. I see some strong alts, HYPE obviously the most obvious one but in general alts are performing not too bad (the good ones). Not sure where we are in market but if we follow 4 year cycle we still have some rough times ahead. Hopefully stays somewhat stable here.

6🤣6

4 Jun 2026, 05:39 UTC386 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoinBureauPhoto

👀 NO ONE IS PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS SIGNAL: Bitcoin Dominance just crashed to 57.83%, its lowest level since September 2025. Meanwhile, the Alts/Btc ratio has surged to a 15-month high, with altcoins outperforming BTC by 31% since May. Altcoins have gained immense relative strength during Bitcoin's sharp decline from $83,000 to $61,000. Are we at the end of the cycle?

🤣5😁1

14 May 2026, 12:10 UTC521 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Coinbase Acquires Hyperliquid's USDH Deployer, Native Markets, To Switch All USDH Into USDC: Blog https://x.com/nativemarkets/status/2054894518055448628 Bullish for HYPE

3👍2

25 Apr 2026, 22:22 UTC754 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 ANTHROPIC’S MYTHOS MODEL RAISES NEW CRYPTO SECURITY CONCERNS DeFi leaders warn advanced AI like Anthropic’s Mythos could strengthen both attackers and defenders, widening the gap between projects that prioritize security and those that do not. ———————————————————————————— This stuff scares me still, would recommend not take too much risk in smaller protocols for time being. Need big teams to manage the security,

👍53😁1

19 Apr 2026, 23:40 UTC738 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

My current sentiment: I was bullish, but after rsETH event and AAVE situation I feel a bit worried. Alot big players are affected, there will be damage again on crypto reputation and many starting to wonder if the risks are worth the rewards, myself included. APR 5-10% but the risk of being hacked/losing full collateral makes tradfi options more attractive since you can yield similar there in safer structures. Also

11👍3💯1

19 Apr 2026, 21:55 UTC510 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

rsETH exploit currently shook up the DeFI world. Im following it closely last days, its been quite rough but hopefully we pull through it. Hopefully solves fast, the longer it drags the worse it gets but there are some signs we will be back to normal next week.

🙏43

14 Apr 2026, 12:30 UTC620 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @CoinBureauPhoto

🔍 $BTC is now printing its 3rd consecutive weekly GREEN candle, a streak not seen since July last year.

🔥5🤣1😭1

8 Apr 2026, 14:07 UTC589 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨IRAN DEMANDS CRYPTO FEES AS TOLLS DURING CEASEFIRE Iran could demand oil tankers to pay crypto as tolls during the two-week ceasefire period as it seeks to maintain control over passage through the key waterway, per FT. $1 per barrel of oil, empty tankers can pass freely. ——————————————————————————- More and more usecases for crypto

3

7 Apr 2026, 23:35 UTC551 viewsread 8 August 2026

Guess IRAN media was right, reverse trade Trump = profit. Are we back? Who knows, but looks promising.

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DefiWhaleVC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DefiWhale” (@DefiWhaleVC), 951 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DefiWhaleVC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.