Channel
@DeepTraders0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,697subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001560648728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeepTraders0 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeepTraders0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 1,697 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,702 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 1,702 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2024 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#BTC Quick update: If $BTC holds 59,150 as support, we play the bounce. Otherwise, I wouldn't be surprised to see a flush to grab liquidity below the Previous Week Low (58,136) or even the Oct 2024 low (57,311). Let's see how the Monday open dictates flow. Keep a close eye on $SPX as well—if equities continue to drop this week, hitting those lower BTC targets is highly likely. @cryptosignals
Above 94k is free-bird
📊Coin: #ARPA/USDT 🟠Exchange : Binance 📈Buy iN $0.02300 - $0.02330 🔥 Target $0.02470 🔥 Target $0.02580 🔥 Target $0.02700 + 🚀 😢Stop Loss: $0.02200🫣 ‼️Buy&Sell Your Own Risk‼️
👩🏫 2026 CRYPTO PERSPECTIVE From 2016 (when I joined crypto) everyone dreamed about mass adoption, institutions joining and big money injections. Now in late 2025 we have everything, but are we really happy about it? Crazy rollercoaster turned into a boring and heavy stocks-like market. Harder to trade, harder to tolerate. There are no crazy valuations anymore, nobody wants to invest into a multi-billion crypto pro…
Local bottoms hit today #BTC
#STRK = next ZEC
#BTC grabbed Sell side Liquidity below 98225 and at the same time balanced the Monthly FVG as anticipated Market is just Hunting Overleveraged longs once that's done we are good to go Higher
#DASH not done yet.
#ZEC was the main charater in the period Oct - early Nov. ZEC marked the top yesterday Next stage, #ICP will take the spotlight and become to be Main-charater
#ICP bullmarket gets started
🔥1
Grab Profits 🫶💥
#ARKM Buy Setup (Spot) 🛒Entry 1 - 0.515 CMP (30%) 🛒Entry 2 - 0.472 (30%) 🛒Entry 3 - 0.435 (40%) 🎯Targets - 0.57 - 0.64 - 0.72 - 0.88 - 1.1 🎯HODL Targets - 1.8 - 2.5$ 🛑Stoploss - 0.42$
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DeepTraders0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DeepTraders0 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DogeChu” (@DeepTraders0), 1,697 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeepTraders0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.