Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 47 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,179–2,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 20:37
2,187
+1
6 Oct 2026, 13:20
2,186
+4
29 Sept 2026, 03:00
2,182
+1
19 Sept 2026, 15:18
2,181
-2
14 Sept 2026, 19:55
2,183
-4
11 Sept 2026, 05:40
2,187
-1
6 Sept 2026, 01:57
2,188
-3
2 Sept 2026, 02:08
2,191
-3
27 Aug 2026, 00:00
2,194
no change
26 Aug 2026, 23:45
2,194
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
646 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
264
40.9%
👍
114
17.6%
❤
98
15.2%
🔥
75
11.6%
🤔
24
3.72%
🦄
22
3.41%
❤🔥
12
1.86%
😢
11
1.70%
🗿
7
1.08%
☃
6
0.929%
🤯
4
0.619%
🍌
3
0.464%
👎
3
0.464%
😱
2
0.31%
👀
1
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DeadSunsetListen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У меня тут был интересный опыт, попробовал себя в роли преподавателя) Рассказывал подросткам про 3д моделирование и принципы работы аудиосистем, что могу сказать?)
Работать вживую куда сложнее, чем писать сценарий, снимать и монтировать видос 😅 Ну или мне непривычно очень) Опыт интересный, полезный, но очень волнительный и не простой, от того что нужно было полностью составить программу на 10 часов обучения, до того…
Как же давно я с деревом не работал... Все пластик, пластик, но по ощущениям дерево на голову приятнее металла и на 2 головы выше пластика, короче, любовь)
Господа, сегодня вышла вторая часть one assassination under God, я ещё не слушал, но доверенные лица говорят Это полный разъеб) Как закончу с делами обязательно приступлю к изучению материала и дам сюда свою рецензию
2 месяца назад я дособрал систему в ягуаре, но так ее и не настроил, причиной тому было отсутствие сигнала на правый мид. И когда понял, что нужно копаться и искать причину решительно на это забил т.к. вообще не было ни настроения ни желания. И вот, наконец, добрались руки! Виновником стал GZ RA4 HD на котором выгорели 3 из 4х каналов... На его место временно заехала аура шторм 4.150, но как мы знаем, нет ничего боле…
Моя "любимая" задача в автозвуке - впихнуть невпихуемое. Тут недавно в лифтбэк 2*18 считали, мало того, что форма сложная, мало того, что короб составной, ещё и методика установки сильно радует 😂
Как же я ору с этого SPL)
Подоспел отчёт с судейского тренинга EMMA на сезон 2026
Я не буду долго углубляться в аппаратуру, расстановку судей и прочие нюансы, оставлю это сугубо на ваш суд
От себя лишь выскажу ехидное замечание о том, что именно вот этот конклав будет оценивать качество звучания ваших систем в сезоне 2026, ориентируясь на "референсное звучание", представленное на фото
Стоит что-то говорить о моем мнение о соревнованиях по …
🔥34❤8🦄5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DeadSunsetListen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ТРЕКИ ОТ BassRazuvaev @BassRazuvaev · 23,430 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 24 September 2026
🔥Low Bass by Matrix🔥 @bass_matrix · 56,460 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
АВТОЗВУК bass club production @vbassclub · 31,342 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dead_Sunset [UnCensored]” (@DeadSunsetListen), 2,187 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeadSunsetListen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
![Telegram profile photo for Dead_Sunset [UnCensored]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/5f/5f02643427d8c98832c46bd20e28439bf79ae95785d8ee742b17490a7f53ca63.jpg)