Recently the Nostra (starknet) protocol got exploited. It feels like everyone's already forgotten about it, but this exploit is worth pointing out. If the following two things line up in a protocol: 1. It accepts a low-liquidity token as collateral 2. 2. An oracle that picks whichever pool looks most liquid Then that protocol can be drained by pumping the price. Not just anyone can pull this off, having an AI agent …

Channel
DeFi View
@DeFi_View
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002800818686 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeFi_View |
| Description | 🔥Track your DeFi portfolio from any Telegram chat. One tap. No wallet connect. No desktop needed. @DeFi_View_Bot |
| Created | 28 June 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeFi_View |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:23 | 21 | no change |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 21 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 20 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 28 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 66.7%
- avg views ÷ 21 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (28 June 2025 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 14 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 33 | 53.2% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 21.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2025 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
a 3% price move just liquidated $36M on Morpho someone spent $320K buying YT-reUSD on Pendle, pushed implied yield from 11% to 20%+, and that alone dragged PT-reUSD down enough to trip morpho's 15 min TWAP oracle, no hack, no crash, just math lesson here, 3% is noise on ETH but on a thin PT market it's cheap to manufacture on purpose, your HF buffer needs to match how manipulable your specific collateral actually i…
Do you actually know how much you're earning in DeFi — or just what your wallet balance says this week? I built a spreadsheet that separates real yield from pure market luck. Real example inside: 5.6%/year from my own decisions vs 172%/year the market handed me. Free template, no sign-up: https://t.co/7R72YnrHGR
DeFi Strategy #2: zalooping DeFi strategies can quietly put you in the red if you're not tracking what you actually earn against what you actually pay Found a real wallet that shows exactly how $32,641 across 7 chains, 19 positions, looks like a normal diversified portfolio at a glance The honest number across everything: minus $6,130 a year. Net worth going up doesn't mean the wallet is actually earning Almost …
DeFi View now has a web app. Paste any wallet and see its real yield — net of fees, IL and borrow costs, not just a balance. No Telegram account needed. Sign in (email, Google, or Telegram) to save wallets, unlock honest APR/IL, and get daily PDF reports. 24 EVM chains · Uniswap, Aave, GMX, Aerodrome, Pendle, Lido and more. → defiview.net Bot: @DeFi_View_Bot
🔴 "Not in range" ≠ losing money Real Uniswap V3 position, no cherry-picking. Verify it yourself: Wallet: 0xd4F8504c376FDB580B6B98eabf3bc4acd3C3489c etherscan LDO/WETH pool (0.05% fee), opened 113 days ago, $601k across three deposits. Price moved — position is now 100% LDO. The red "Not in range" warning every LP dashboard shows. Here's what that warning doesn't tell you: • Impermanent loss: -0.68% — basically not…
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
🚀 61% APR on Stablecoins?! Sounds like clickbait, right? Let me break it down 👇 You can get all of this with a looping strategy on Silo Finance on Avalanche (rewards paid in AVAX). 💡 How the loop works: 1️⃣ Stake sUSDe → earn ~8% APR 2️⃣ Deposit sUSDe into Silo 3️⃣ Borrow USDC at ~7.7% APR 4️⃣ Swap USDC back into sUSDe 5️⃣ Deposit sUSDe again 6️⃣ Repeat the loop ~10 times 7️⃣ Check the table for effective APY → mine…
🔥10
Why is our bot useful? 1️⃣ You can check EVERYTHING about your DeFi positions without connecting your wallet 2️⃣ You can check EVERYTHING about your DeFi positions directly from your phone 3️⃣ You can check EVERYTHING about your DeFi positions without leaving Telegram Who is this bot for? 💻 For active DeFi users who need to stay updated on their positions anytime, anywhere 📈 For DeFi users who want to get analytics …
🔥12
🪙Which BTC wrapper to use in 2025? ❤️TL;DR: for operational liquidity use WBTC (DeFi), cbBTC (Coinbase / Base users), and BTC.b (Avalanche-native). For cold/core capital preservation prefer trust-minimized constructions like tBTC v2 Picks (core — use these) 💰 cbBTC — best for Coinbase / Base users: 1:1 Coinbase-backed ERC-20, smooth internal redemption for Coinbase customers and on-chain Proof-of-Reserves available…
❤13
⚠️ Cetus exploit — timeline, opportunity and how the market lag opened a short window (images: exploit tx at 10:31 and price snapshot at 10:39 attached) Disclaimer: this is not financial advice Today we’re breaking down the Cetus DEX exploit and the short-window that opened between the on-chain exploit and the market reaction — plus practical ways to spot the next one fast. ❤️TL;DR • At 10:31 the attacker executed…
🔥11
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @DeFi_View. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeFi View” (@DeFi_View), 21 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeFi_View.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.