Bot

DeFensy 🛡⚔️ AntiSpamBot

@DeFensy_bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

200,340monthly users

+7,321 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID	2122880839
Type	Bot
Username	@DeFensy_bot
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	6
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/DeFensy_bot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7,321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191,475–204,858 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Monthly users	Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:13	200,340	+697
11 Aug 2026, 20:46	199,643	-3,671
8 Aug 2026, 17:33	203,314	+1,917
6 Aug 2026, 18:45	201,397	+8,378
6 Aug 2026, 18:23	193,019	no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:04	193,019	first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

:] Полезные боты для бизнеса и жизни
@botsbaseru · 101,22427 posts :] RR
@rbsfamilybots · 2,3064 posts Dmitriy Swarowsky
@SwarowskyENL · 304 posts Алексеич | TG
@alekseich_telegram · 121 post ⚡️𝘕𝘈𝘛𝘈𝘓𝘠𝘈
@birth_e · 2091 post BotPulse — Боты для жизни и бизнеса
@botspulse · 6031 post Дело не в трафике
@esina_blog · 1,2331 post Feyzullayeva
@feyzullayeva966 · 831 post Investment kingyru 💎
@investkingyru · 1,858,5171 post Каталог Telegram
@Kanal_Catalog_Telegram · 9611 post ЛАРИСА ПРО запуски
@larisaproducer · 331 post ИИ - Нейросети и прокси
@m_alena_ii · 201 post Таинственный Телеграм
@mysterious_tg · 9771 post НИКИТА ЮНОВ | ДЕНЬГИ В ТЕЛЕЖКЕ 🛒
@nikitaykn0w · 5551 post Разработка Telegram ботов RBS :]
@rbsbots · 3781 post Яндекс.Директ | Как это работает
@reklama_dlya_ekspertov · 2341 post SMM с Натальей Спиридоновой
@spiridonovasmm · 201 post 📊🗃️Телеграм по полочкам
@telegaadmin88 · 671 post Сбор вакансий
@testbobi2424 · 71 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeFensy 🛡⚔️ AntiSpamBot” (@DeFensy_bot), 200,340 monthly users as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeFensy_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.