Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for David Sinclair

Channel

David Sinclair

@DavidASinclair

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

364subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583159326
TypeChannel
Username@DavidASinclair
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 21 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/DavidASinclair

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

359364361.57 August 2026 — 359 subscribers8 August 2026 — 359 subscribers14 August 2026 — 362 subscribers20 August 2026 — 361 subscribers2 September 2026 — 362 subscribers28 September 2026 — 361 subscribers8 October 2026 — 364 subscribers7 August 20268 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 62 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 358–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 20:40364+3
28 Sept 2026, 15:39361-1
2 Sept 2026, 17:37362+1
20 Aug 2026, 14:37361-1
14 Aug 2026, 12:05362+3
8 Aug 2026, 06:34359no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:38359first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4340.6%
👍4037.7%
🔥98.49%
👏54.72%
👀32.83%
🤔32.83%
🙏21.89%
🥰10.943%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2022 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2026, 15:40 UTC239 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Nesprin-2 stops cell growth when it senses mechanical load by compacting DNA, i.e. altering the epigenome The paper https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ads9412

🔥4

28 Apr 2026, 15:40 UTC230 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wondered why we don’t hear about heart cancer? Contraction-sensing Nesprin-2 protein is discovered to prevent heart cancer By causing cells to pulse (or adding in Nespirin) we might be able to treat cancer in other organs 👏

🔥5❤2

2 Dec 2025, 11:42 UTC562 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

36% of people who live beyond 100 say they participate in stress relief, like meditation or prayer. Many focus on a healthy diet, 40% play video games regularly, and 1/3 have tried ChatGPT or another AI platform Probably no coincidence https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5618203

❤9👀2

20 Nov 2025, 05:59 UTC598 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

For 30 years we’ve only known of 7 Sirtuins, proteins that play diverse roles in health & longevity. New study finds 100+ more vertebrate Sirtuins that form filaments and can drain NAD https://www.nature.com/articles/s41594-025-01715-1

👍5👀1

2 Jun 2025, 19:09 UTC797 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NEW STUDY: 12 years of data from 12,000 adults aged 50+ indicates that people with stronger grip strengths have a 45% lower risk of dying! 💪 https://www.prevention.com/health/a64892526/grip-strength-longevity-study/

❤7

1 Sept 2024, 18:25 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

First atlas of nasal/oral microbes during aging. Before the ages of 15-24, youths have fewer species than older people & microbe types are influenced by smoking, infections, antibiotics & living with children. Your mouth is more important than you think. Here's why... 👶🏼🧵 https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(24)00768-2?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email

👍6❤4

13 Jul 2023, 04:28 UTC≈2,060 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Grateful to share our latest publication: We’ve previously shown age reversal is possible using gene therapy to turn on embryonic genes. Now we show it’s possible with chemical cocktails, a step towards affordable whole-body rejuvenation 1/17 https://www.aging-us.com/article/204896/text

👍10❤2🙏2

28 Apr 2023, 08:13 UTC≈1,850 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Story 8/10 👏 Pun 2/10 🙈 https://www.fiercebiotech.com/research/life-biosciences-gene-therapy-restores-vision-primates-naion

👍2❤1👏1🤔1

22 Apr 2023, 13:14 UTC≈1,630 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A perspective summarizing our recent paper testing the Information Theory of Aging and age reversal tech in mice https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01412-9

❤5👏2

5 Mar 2023, 20:10 UTC≈1,480 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Factors that accelerate epigenetic aging: 1. Smoking (worst) 2. Alcohol intake 3. Waist size 4. Body fat 5. CRP (inflammation) 6. Triglycerides 7. Childhood obesity 8. Type 2 diabetes (Alcohol is turning out to be more toxic than we thought. Sorry) https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/gerona/glad078/7069451?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

❤7👍1

17 Feb 2023, 19:16 UTC≈1,150 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Studies over the past few years show alcohol damages the brain and affects memory more than previously thought. Drunk flies may help us understand why https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36750369/

👍2❤1

21 Jan 2023, 19:56 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

US Existing Home Sales decrease - largest ever annual decline🔥🔥🔥

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DavidASinclair. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“David Sinclair” (@DavidASinclair), 364 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DavidASinclair.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.