Согласны? Узнали? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYf_9QGH62w
🔥9

Channel
@DataScienceGuy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,424subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001293381817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DataScienceGuy |
| Created | 30 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DataScienceGuy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 3,424 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 3,427 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 3,428 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
619 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 275 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 153 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 14.1% | |
| 😱 | 72 | 11.6% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 4.36% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.323% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.323% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.162% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2022 to 29 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Согласны? Узнали? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYf_9QGH62w
🔥9
Еще на тему генеративных сетей, наткнулся на такое видео, выглядит очень впечатляюще. Если в кратце, автор видео с помощью GPT подобной сети и текстовых команд сделал рабочий сайт/ веб приложение. Интересно узнать ваше мнение! Пользуетесь подобными сервисами уже? Давайте обсудим в комментариях https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bju-s7AVLnI
❤5👍3
Что за гений 😳 "Скормил GPT все инструкции от всей домашней бытовой техники и дал инструкции отвечать только на основании этих pdf’ок. Вторую неделю жизнь не такая, как прежде. — Сколько там минут длится программа «Пицца» в хлебопечке? — Как отключить звук на ИБП? — Какая комбинация температуры и оборотов отжима для шерстяного свитера?" Ссылка на источник на линкедине: link Кстати если у вас нет линкедина, с…
❤23👍6😁3🔥2⚡1
Новый сезон подкаста Собес вышел! Напомню, что весь сезон — это мок-интервью с реальными рекрутерами из международных компаний! Сегодня — первый эпизод, все следующие будут выходить по вторникам. Фронтендер Никита проходит собес, а потом мы с рекрутером Маргаритой (из американского единорога) даём ему честный фидбек. Тот самый, который вы никогда не услышите от работодателя :) 👉Слушайте на всех платформах
🔥8👍6🤩1
⭐️ Поведенческое интервью ⭐️ Или как его еще называют cultural fit, behavioral interview. На самом деле считается чуть ли не самым важным этапом во всем процессе собеседования. Даже если вы отличный специалист, вас могут не взять на работу, если вам будет сложно работать в команде из-за несоответствия общему «вайбу» компании.💃 Конечно, ваше поведение, характер и манера общения (одним словом soft skills) оцениваютс…
👍64🔥3❤1
Как пикапят дата саентисты:
😁18❤8👍2
Ого, это что, литкод для MLщиков? https://www.deep-ml.com/
😱24🔥14👍7❤2
Прикольная библиотечка для оживления портретов. Последний раз тестил что то подобное несколько лет назад, и было скорее кринжово, а щас прям даже неплохо) Повторяет чисто мимику, но если достаточно хорошо артикулировать а потом подставить аудио с исходного видоса, то можно даже делать видео с говорящей головой) Сам аватар тоже сгенеренный по моей фотке через диффузионку. Попробовать либу по оживлению можно тут: htt…
❤8🔥8👍1
Наткнулся на интересную статейку: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381047082_Off-camera_gaze_decreases_evaluation_scores_in_a_simulated_online_job_interview В ней исследовали вопрос важности направления взгляда в онлайн собедованиях. Последнее время очень много собеседований проходит именно в формате видео звонка, но из-за несовпадения расположения камеры и экрана на устройствах, таких как смартфоны и ноутб…
👍31❤3
В последнее время я довольно часто хожу на собеседования. Каждая первая, плюс-минус крупная компания (MAANG, Сбер, Т-банк, Яндекс и тд), имеет хотя бы один этап, содержащий алгоритмические задачи (в простонародье - литкод или алгосы). Этот этап по праву считается самым нелюбимым у кандидатов, но в то же время он, на мой взгляд, самый простой и понятный по процессу подготовки к нему. Как писал Yorko на своем канале, …
👍66❤22
Приветы! Давно не виделись. ✋🏻 Ну как вы там? Как успехи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😱47🔥12❤8🎉1
В честь дня защитника отечества, предлагаю вам почитать статьи про безопасность алгоритмов машинного обучения и как защититься от так называемых "адверсариал атак" Виды: https://habr.com/ru/company/dsec/blog/437092/ Защита: https://habr.com/ru/company/dsec/blog/438644/
👍19🔥4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DataScienceGuy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Приветы! Давно не виделись. ✋🏻 Ну как вы там? Как успехи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2022 to 29 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Data Science Guy” (@DataScienceGuy), 3,424 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DataScienceGuy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.