Channel
@Dash_Course
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
255subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002408105883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dash_Course |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dash_Course |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 255 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 256 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
110 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 47 | 42.7% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 40.9% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 12.7% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 25 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dash_Course. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2025 to 25 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 DashCourse стартует уже в сентябре! Мы с гордостью представляем вам DashCourse — платформу, которую мы создавали с вниманием к деталям, уважением к преподаванию и верой в осмысленное образование. Уже этой осенью она станет доступна — как современная среда для подготовки к ОГЭ и ЕГЭ, с интерактивными уроками, аналитикой, домашними заданиями и другими возможностями. 📚 На платформе появится Банк задач, который станет…
🔥9❤2🥰2👍1
Коллеги, друзья, доброго дня и отличного старта недели! Май подходит к концу, а экзамены — уже на пороге. Многие из нас, как и вы, коллеги, работают на максимум, чтобы помочь ученикам подойти к ним во всеоружии. А ребята стараются использовать последние дни по максимуму — отрабатывать слабые темы и закреплять пройденное. Надеемся 😉 Недавно мы делились, какие задания первой части ОГЭ вызывают наибольшие трудности. П…
👍6❤5💯1
👋 Коллеги, добрый день! Май в самом разгаре, а до ОГЭ — всего считанные недели. Недавно мы делились статистикой, какие задания первой части вызывают наибольшие трудности у девятиклассников. 🧪По химии — это задачи №18 и №19. Сегодня подробнее разберём, в чём их суть и почему именно они «проваливаются» чаще всего. Что проверяют эти задания? Обе задачи связаны с массовой долей вещества и идут в связке: №18 — вычис…
👍6❤3
👋 Коллеги, друзья, всем хорошего начала рабочей недели! Апрель подходит к концу, впереди майские праздники... А значит, до экзаменов осталось всего месяц! 🎯 В прошлый раз мы разбирались, какие задания первой части ОГЭ вызывают наибольшие трудности у девятиклассников. Теперь давайте подробнее пройдёмся по отдельным предметам — начнём с математики, царицы наук! 📐 Какая тема первой части вызывает затруднения даже у х…
❤2👍1💯1
Самые сложные задания первой части для учеников в ОГЭ: на чём заваливается большинство школьников? Вы знали, какие задания ОГЭ вызывают больше всего трудностей у учеников? Мы изучили официальную статистику — и готовы поделиться выводами 👇 🔬 Физика ➖№6 (ранее №5) — вычислительная задача по механике ➖№10 (ранее №9) — электрические цепи, линзы, магниты, графики величин из электричества Источник 1, Источник 2 💻 Инфор…
👍3❤1
Коллеги, друзья, всем доброго дня и отличного начала недели! 🛠 Запуск платформы немного задерживается из-за технических нюансов. Хотим, чтобы всё было максимально качественно и отлажено. А пока появилась идея дополнить наши курсы методическими рекомендациями, чёткими критериями и особенностями проверки заданий ОГЭ (а к сентябрю по аналогии добавим и для ЕГЭ). 👆 Одним из таких материалов делимся с вами прямо сейчас…
👍2❤1
🎓 Качественное образование — стратегическая задача для будущего России! Сегодня государство уделяет особое внимание развитию математических и естественно-научных дисциплин. Это не просто приоритет, а стратегическая необходимость для укрепления научного и технологического потенциала страны. Заложен курс государства на: ✅ обновление образовательных стандартов и основных образовательных программ по ключевым дисциплина…
❤5👍2
Какой формат обучения на Ваш взгляд удобнее?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3👍2
Пошаговое решение более сложных задач с иллюстрациями на каждом шаге
👍4❤2
🎓 Почему качественные материалы — ключ к успеху в обучении? В прошлом посте мы спрашивали вас, чего не хватает современному онлайн-образованию. Сегодня мы хотим поделиться нашим видением! ✅ Что делает обучение эффективным? Мы в DashCourse уверены, что настоящее обучение — это не просто заучивание материала, а его глубокое понимание. Вот подходы, которые мы внедряем в готовые уроки: • Учим задавать вопросы и наход…
❤4🔥3👍2
Техника вопросов при объяснении решения задачи
👍4❤2
Разные подходы к решению задач. Например, через готовую формулу, либо более длинным путём, но с помощью более простых фактов
👍4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Dash_Course. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой формат обучения на Ваш взгляд удобнее?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 25 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 332,374 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DashCourse | ДашКурс | Готовые решения для Ваших уроков | Уроки "под ключ"” (@Dash_Course), 255 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dash_Course.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.