Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑤𝑒𝑏_𝐹𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡85

Channel

@𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑤𝑒𝑏_𝐹𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡85

@Darkweb_Fight85

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

334subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002171379125
TypeChannel
Username@Darkweb_Fight85
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Darkweb_Fight85

Growth

3343383367 August 2026 — 338 subscribers8 August 2026 — 338 subscribers23 August 2026 — 335 subscribers30 August 2026 — 334 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 333–339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 00:43334-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:25335-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:03338no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:24338first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 334 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total693
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34m 51s
Average length
2m 11s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

बेचारा कुंवारा 🤡🤓🤣🤡

7 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026

Prices, Since Start Of The Year. Rice: +46% Cotton: +29% Wheat: +26% Wool: +21% Rubber: +20% Palm Oil: +16% Tea: +15% Sunflower Oil: +15% Cheese: +12% Soybeans: +11%

7 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

अगर बेटियां ऐसी हो तो प्रत्येक माता-पिता भगवान से यही प्रार्थना करेंगे- “अगले जन्म मोहे बिटियां ना दीजो"। #CJPProtest #Jantarmanttar #Delhi

6 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

'Mujhe Peeche Se Laath 🦶 Mare' Rajdeep Sardesai Claims That During The 2002 Gujarat Assembly Election Campaign, He Was Attacked From Behind by a Crowd At a Rally Addressed By Amit Shah. According To Sardesai, The Mob Physically Assaulted Him, Including 🤛 Punching And 🦶Kicking Him, And He Says He Was Even Kicked In The Butt During The Incident.

6 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Security Forces Released Wanted Posters For Lashkar-e-Taiba Militant Mohd Lateef Bhat At Press Enclave, Offering a ₹15 Lakh Reward For Information Leading to His Arrest.

6 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚨 ☪️ Islamic Scholars In The 🇺🇸 U.S. Reveal Their Maksad: “There Are Not Enough Muslims In America Right Now To Demand Full Sharia Law And Replace Its Secular System. That Is Why We Need To Gain Political Power And Implement It Little By Little.”

6 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

'Now Muslims Have Problem With Japanese Non-Halal Food' A Musal-Man Claims That "Pork 🐖 Was Never a Part Of The Traditional 🇯🇵Japanese Diet" And Implies That It Should Be Easy For Japanese People To Stop Eating It. He Also Explains That The Traditional Japanese Diet Is HALAL.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Darkweb_Fight85. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 967,619 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@𝐷𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑤𝑒𝑏_𝐹𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡85” (@Darkweb_Fight85), 334 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Darkweb_Fight85.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.