Channel
@DarkVibesWW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003580476727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DarkVibesWW |
| Description | Обо всем по-немногу |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DarkVibesWW |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 21 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
57 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404621828347950538 | 17 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5195357209072002862 | 14 | 24.6% | |
| custom 5213076551918191011 | 12 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5404636633100218687 | 9 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5204186360457488106 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5406624133511409154 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5355265567420862789 | 1 | 1.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Не то, что мните вы, природа: Не слепок, не бездушный лик — В ней есть душа, в ней есть свобода, В ней есть любовь, в ней есть язык…» Фёдор Тютчев Сейчас нахожусь в небольшом путешествии, красивые снимки буду выкладывать сюда😏
custom 52041863604574881061custom 54046218283479505381
Перфекционизм, который не дает спать, но двигает прогресс. В жизни очень часто сталкиваюсь с собственным перфекционизмом, и иногда с этим реально сложно жить (я не про мелочный перфекционизм). Суть в излишних заморочках на дела, которые особо не требуют моего внимания. Например, делаю какой-нибудь доклад в школу по ненужному предмету и не самой интересной теме, но пока я не доведу его до своего мысленного идеала, это…
custom 54046218283479505383custom 54046366331002186872custom 54066241335114091541
«На мой взгляд, существует единственная форма человеческого падения — потеря цели.» Айн Рэнд #цитаты@DarkVibesWW
custom 54046218283479505384custom 51953572090720028621custom 52130765519181910111custom 54066241335114091541
Социальные навыки необходимы, и вот почему.👀 Я никогда не задумывался о своем окружении. Общался с теми, кто встречался на пути, и особо не искал новых знакомств. Но с возрастом понимаешь, насколько знакомства важны в жизни. Качественные, полезные и интересные знакомства происходят благодаря развитым социальным навыкам. Если ты умеешь круто общаться, ты будешь интересен людям и выйдешь на людей интересных тебе, а ок…
custom 51953572090720028622custom 54046218283479505382custom 52130765519181910111
«Жизнь состоит не в том, чтобы найти себя. Жизнь состоит в том, чтобы создать себя» Джордж Бернард Шоу #цитаты@DarkVibesWW
custom 51953572090720028622custom 52130765519181910112custom 54046218283479505381
Доверяй лишь себе и определи собственные цели. Одной из многочисленных проблем современного молодежного общества является присвоение чужих ценностей и целей. Все испортили социальные сети, где поминутно постят свою жизнь всякие богатые челики, а другие люди на это смотрят и думают, что вот она – цель, вот оно – счастье. Однако, стремясь получить такую жизнь, подобный успех, люди нередко уходят от себя и идут не за…
custom 51953572090720028623custom 52130765519181910112custom 52041863604574881061custom 54046218283479505381custom 54046366331002186871
«Возьми лето в руку, налей лето в бокал — в самый крохотный, конечно, из какого только и сделаешь единственный терпкий глоток; поднеси его к губам — и по жилам твоим вместо лютой зимы побежит жаркое лето…» Рэй Брэдбери #цитаты@DarkVibesWW
custom 51953572090720028622custom 52130765519181910112custom 54046218283479505381
«В любви всегда есть доля безумия. Но в безумии всегда есть причина». Фридрих Ницше #цитаты@DarkVibesWW
custom 52130765519181910112custom 54046366331002186872custom 51953572090720028621custom 53552655674208627891
Экраны реально высасывают энергию. Заметил, как только начинаешь отдыхать с телефоном в руках, сразу теряются силы. К тому же, экраны затягивают, и иногда просто не замечаешь времени, а после организм будто истощен, и энергии вовсе нет, как будто необходим еще отдых. Наши устройства несут в себе столько информации, что организм начинает действительно уставать. Мозг перегружается из-за внимания и многочисленных неболь…
custom 52130765519181910112custom 51953572090720028621custom 54046218283479505381custom 54046366331002186871
«Любовь — это не смотреть друг на друга, а смотреть в одном направлении» Антуан де Сент‑Экзюпери #цитаты@DarkVibesWW
custom 54046218283479505383custom 54046366331002186873custom 51953572090720028622
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @DarkVibesWW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 289,046 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dark Vibes” (@DarkVibesWW), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarkVibesWW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.