Channel
@DarkSide_Reviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
137subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003440719301 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DarkSide_Reviews |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 23 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DarkSide_Reviews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 137 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 130 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 123 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
14 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#deal 120$ week premium The new auto-purchase feature worked perfectly. Several users have already successfully purchased cloud access without admin intervention and gained immediate access to their chosen plan. This specific transaction was for a week of Premium service for $120. Thanks for choosing us! <3 @DarkSide_support_bot - buy sub
#renew 300$ gold month by regular customer
#renew #review 100$ budget subscription renewed with good feedback ❤️
#renew #deal One of our regular customers has been extending our cooperation in the gold channel for the 4th month. Meanwhile, there are already about 8 regular customers of the gold tariff. Thanks to this, we raise the quality and quantity of the incoming material and work for you. 🩷
#deal #renew We are pleasantly surprised, at the moment the gold tariff has become the most sought after and the most renewable among our subscribers. the more investment, the more pleasant the result. we will try to continue to give you pleasure and acquire new sources, your admin 🩷🤙
#deal #renew A few recent deals, two regular customers continue to extend their favourite tariffs, and we continue to work to make them pay for themselves. thank you for your trust 🤗
#review #feedback #renew Our new regular customer left a review a few months later in the gold channel. thank you for your trust, we will always try for the result.
❤3
#review #deal 250$ , gold plan | month
❤2
#review #deal 300$ , gold plan I'm pleased that you're satisfied with the quality of our l0*gs. This isn't demonstrated by words, but by the percentage at which you renew your subscriptions. Over the past two months, 85% of participants have renewed their subscriptions, 50% of whom purchased a more expensive plan. ☀️
❤3
#review #deal 140$ renew subscribers Thank you very much for trusting our service and renewing subscriptions, the last 5 people have renewed their subscription in our cloud
❤3
#review ку бро, отзыв ты просил написать как профит будет. вчера спать лег, не работал, сегодня прочекал кошельки, и с одного снять смог сотку. пока лучший результат из всех клаудов которые я покупал, за 1 день. я думаю до конца дня еще тебе скрины покидаю выводов если надо, ибо материала оч много, не успеваю дарксайд лучший, спасибо за сервис 🥰 ——————————————— Translation Yo bro, you asked me to write a review …
❤3
#review renew 1 month premium + review 💝 200$ deal
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @DarkSide_Reviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 488,110 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DarkSide Reviews” (@DarkSide_Reviews), 137 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarkSide_Reviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.