Channel
@DarkHarsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,738subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001673547827 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DarkHarsh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DarkHarsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 1,738 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,743 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 1,746 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 1,750 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 1,753 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 1,756 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,756 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 51.6% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 21.4% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 8.81% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 6.92% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.14% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 2.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey everyone, I could really use your help right now. My X account (@Cryptoharsh24) has been suspended by X. If you have a moment, please tag @X, @elonmusk, and @nikitabier in the comments so this can hopefully reach the right people. https://x.com/Dark_Harsh24/status/2075693238267363409?s=20
👍6❤1
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
$Cashcat might be the first meme to hit 1B MC on Robinhood Chain. Fingers crossed 🤞
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Robinhood got the heat
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Whenever I think of starting something Market gets bad… 😩 Or koi agrrr nazar lgaaa rha h toh bhai Beth ke baat kr lete h na😓
❤10😢4
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Let’s start trading Alts & Prediction Markets 🤝
❤13
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Channel photo updated
RIP
🙏11❤2
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
A slight dip to the 68K range would be a healthy correction. After that, 100K+ is very much on the table — mark my words. The overall direction remains bullish, and I'll be strategically DCA-ing into SOL and other interesting assets. See you at the top — 18.05.2026 🚀
❤10
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
🚀 $DEGEN is here! 💎 Don't miss out on the next big move! 📋 CA: HFUvD7ndvzfLuwygP3mZeVLK6Mh8hPa3YYWCY6zmpump 📢 See what the buzz is about: https://x.com/risto240484/status/2056369572425371731?s=20
❤3
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Let's see how still active!!!!
❤31⚡5🔥2
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Anyone here?
👍18❤6👌4
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
If you have invested 100k$ worth of $PIXEL coin at 1$ 2 years ago , you have only 550$ right now Same for $DYN $STRK $RON $xai $Alt $Ai $nfp $Ace …. Thanks to binance listing team
😢10❤4
Signed Harsh Saxena ₿ | 🇦🇪
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DarkHarsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dark Harsh ₿” (@DarkHarsh), 1,738 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarkHarsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.