Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ | ⤷ ゛ ˎˊ˗ ᴅᴀɴɴʏ ʀᴀɴᴅ ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)

@DannyRand_db

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003845897457
TypeChannel
Username@DannyRand_db
Description我不是同性恋 ɪᴛ ɪs ᴜsᴇᴅ ғᴏʀ: @DailyBugleCetka
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DannyRand_db

Growth

319 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:4531no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:1831first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.2%
avg views ÷ 31 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.1
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total559
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52851695236017239112253.7%
🦄1024.4%
custom 5287511156951375491922.0%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC9 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🥹#ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ 🥹 #ᴘᴏsᴛ 🌟🌟 🌟Сегодня получил камнем по затылку. 🌟Неприятно, конечно, но такое мнение тоже имеет место быть. Не всем нравится, что какой-то приезжий вдруг оказался наследником торговой компании. 🌟Товаров, кстати, стало немного меньше. Скорее всего, из-за нового контроля: теперь нельзя перевозить то, что раньше спокойно перевозили, потому что на правила попросту плевали.

custom 52851695236017239113

5 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🥹#ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ #ᴅᴇʟᴇᴛᴇᴅ 🥹 #ᴘᴏsᴛ 🌟🌟 🌟Уснуть здесь — не так просто. 🌟Когда за окном лишь тишина прерий, а где-то вдали слышится скрип дерева или шаги по пыльной земле, сложно не думать о том, что кто-то может прийти за тобой этой ночью. Пуля не предупреждает, а человек с дурными намерениями не стучится в дверь. 🌟Иногда я ловлю себя на мысли, что жду беды даже там, где её нет. Может, это страх. Может, привычка, оставшаяся

custom 52851695236017239111custom 52875111569513754911

5 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC25 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🌟🌺🌟ʙᴀᴄᴋsᴛᴏʀʏ 🎀 🌺🌺 Дэниел Рэнд — наследник богатой семьи, владевшей торговой компанией, перевозившей товары через западные территории. В детстве его родители погибли во время нападения на караван в горах, после чего мальчик бесследно исчез. Все считали семью погибшей, однако мальчика спасла небольшая община, жившая далеко за пределами цивилизации. Там он вырос, научился выживать в суровых условиях и освоил восточные

custom 52851695236017239111

5 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ | ⤷ ゛ ˎˊ˗ ᴅᴀɴɴʏ ʀᴀɴᴅ ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)»

4 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC27 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🥹#ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ 🥹 #ᴘᴏsᴛ 🥹🥹 🌟Договорился послезавтра увидеться с Коллин. Волнуюсь ли я? Да. Наверное, больше, чем хотел бы признавать. 😨 🌟Она была рада снова связаться со мной, и это действительно многое значит. Но, зная Коллин... Я бы не удивился, если бы первой реакцией при встрече был не разговор, а удар. 🌟Хотя, если честно, я бы, наверное, это заслужил. Слишком много всего произошло. Я исчез, оставил её разбираться с

custom 52851695236017239114🦄2custom 52875111569513754912

2 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC37 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🥹#ɪɴᴛᴇʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ 🥹 #ᴘᴏsᴛ 🥹 🌟🌟🌟@mattmurdock_db 🌟Дэнни едва заметно улыбнулся словам Мэтта. Было приятно понять, что тот не стал осуждать его решение. Честно говоря, он и сам до конца не знал, правильно ли тогда поступил. Иногда ему казалось, что, оставив Коллин, он действительно дал ей возможность наконец пожить спокойно. Иногда — что просто в очередной раз решил всё взять на себя. 🌟Он не стал развивать эту тему. Прошл

custom 52851695236017239114🦄2custom 52875111569513754912

1 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC31 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🌟🥹#ɪɴᴛᴇʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ 🥹 #ᴘᴏsᴛ 🥹 🌟🌟🌟🌟@mattmurdock_db 🌟Дэнни слушал Мэтта, не перебивая. Конечно, слова о том, что тот в безопасности, не внушали особого доверия. Но Рэнд не хотел быть настойчивым или слишком навязчивым. По крайней мере, не с Мэттом. 🌟Когда Мёрдок закончил объяснять, к ним подошёл официант, чтобы принять заказ. Дэнни ограничился лишь зелёным чаем. Пока Мэтт выбирал, у него было время подумать над ответом —

custom 52851695236017239113custom 52875111569513754913🦄2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DannyRand_db. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 410,050 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ | ⤷ ゛ ˎˊ˗ ᴅᴀɴɴʏ ʀᴀɴᴅ ꉂ(˵˃ ᗜ ˂˵)” (@DannyRand_db), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DannyRand_db.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.