Channel
@DamiDefiinsider
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,846subscribers
-254 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633439254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DamiDefiinsider |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DamiDefiinsider |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 9,846 | -25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 9,871 | -24 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 9,895 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:28 | 9,939 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 9,958 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 9,975 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 9,996 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 10,012 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 10,020 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 10,024 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 10,029 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 10,035 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 10,043 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 10,046 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 10,055 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 10,063 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 10,068 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 10,075 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 10,078 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 10,090 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
189 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 126 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 12.7% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.59% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.529% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why is Bitcoin suddenly blowing through a resistance level that's held for a while? I've got three theories, probably all true at once. First, flight to safety. The bond market's been moving, and that's a worry signal for inflation and rates. When money gets nervous about sitting in fixed income, some of it rotates into Bitcoin instead. Second, mechanical. A lot of shorts were stacked up against that resistance le…
🔥9❤2😁1
I'm watching this line closely. If we break below it I'm opening a short to $60K.
❤8
Been getting a lot of questions about how I spot alts early. So I wrote the whole thing up. New DeFi Insider Newsletter is out now! Read NOW! https://damidefi.substack.com/p/my-exact-framework-for-finding-altcoins
❤11
I'm looking for a crypto dev with real blockchain experience, hit my DMs rn https://x.com/DamiDefi
❤5😱2
$ETH is about to break a 1 year downtrend! Bullish for Altcoins.
🔥9👍2
Down 55% and boring, which is exactly why this $BNB setup works. $BNB is coiling at the apex of a descending triangle on the 3D chart Two years of support around $555 is meeting the descending trendline from the $1,300 top, and price just bounced 3% off the floor I expect the squeeze to resolve up through the trendline near $610, and once that confirms the move opens Target 1: $650 Target 2: $710 Target 3: $785 …
❤7👍1
8 tokens are about to flood the market this week. One of them is unlocking MORE supply than currently exists. Here's your crypto watchlist for the week ahead: $PROVE → 208M tokens unlock Aug 5, ~104% of circulating supply, worth ~$35.4M. Circulating supply effectively doubles overnight. This is the one to watch for sell pressure. $ENA → 171M tokens unlock Aug 5, ~$15.1M, 1.97% of circulating supply. Minor diluti…
❤7
Four specific things break an AI agent as it runs, and each one looks different. An agent that repeats a fact that was never true is poisoning. One that ignores your last instruction and reverts to an old pattern is distraction. One that gives a wrong answer even though the right info was technically available is confusion. One that contradicts itself mid session is clash. Naming which one you're looking at tell…
❤5
One line has called every $ETH top and bottom this cycle, and almost nobody is watching it. EMA 50 Once we're breaking above this, its almost time for alts
👍9❤5🤣3
Robinhood Chain: How to Actually Trade the Memecoin Wave Everything you need to get started with memes on Robinhood and get ahead READ NOW 🚨 https://damidefi.substack.com/p/robinhood-chain-how-to-actually-trade
❤4🔥2
$1INCH is breaking out of the falling wedge on the 3D chart Five rejections off that upper trendline and we've finally pushed through I expect a retest of the broken line before continuation, and as long as we hold above it, the upside opens back up Target 1: $0.105 Target 2: $0.12 Target 3: $0.14 Invalidation: 3D close back inside the wedge below $0.075 Watch for the retest of the trendline to hold as support R…
👍7
$ONDO broke above the descending trendline on the 4H chart that's been capping it since early June Price pumped 35% off the $0.31 lows and is now pulling back to retest the breakout zone around $0.37–$0.38 I expect one more dip to retest that level before the next leg. If it holds, $0.48 is the target Target 1: $0.42 Target 2: $0.48 Invalidation: 4H close back below $0.36 Watch for the $0.37–$0.38 retest to hold…
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @DamiDefiinsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defi Insider by DamiDefi 🔭” (@DamiDefiinsider), 9,846 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DamiDefiinsider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.