Channel
@DamiDefiinsider
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,063subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001633439254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DamiDefiinsider |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DamiDefiinsider |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 10,063 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 10,068 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 10,075 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 10,078 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 10,090 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 10,096 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 10,100 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (27 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,099 |
| Reactions total | 90 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
162 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 67.9% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 14.2% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Been getting a lot of questions about how I spot alts early. So I wrote the whole thing up. New DeFi Insider Newsletter is out now! Read NOW! https://damidefi.substack.com/p/my-exact-framework-for-finding-altcoins
❤10
I'm looking for a crypto dev with real blockchain experience, hit my DMs rn https://x.com/DamiDefi
❤3😱2
$ETH is about to break a 1 year downtrend! Bullish for Altcoins.
🔥8👍2
Down 55% and boring, which is exactly why this $BNB setup works. $BNB is coiling at the apex of a descending triangle on the 3D chart Two years of support around $555 is meeting the descending trendline from the $1,300 top, and price just bounced 3% off the floor I expect the squeeze to resolve up through the trendline near $610, and once that confirms the move opens Target 1: $650 Target 2: $710 Target 3: $785 …
❤6👍1
8 tokens are about to flood the market this week. One of them is unlocking MORE supply than currently exists. Here's your crypto watchlist for the week ahead: $PROVE → 208M tokens unlock Aug 5, ~104% of circulating supply, worth ~$35.4M. Circulating supply effectively doubles overnight. This is the one to watch for sell pressure. $ENA → 171M tokens unlock Aug 5, ~$15.1M, 1.97% of circulating supply. Minor diluti…
❤6
Four specific things break an AI agent as it runs, and each one looks different. An agent that repeats a fact that was never true is poisoning. One that ignores your last instruction and reverts to an old pattern is distraction. One that gives a wrong answer even though the right info was technically available is confusion. One that contradicts itself mid session is clash. Naming which one you're looking at tell…
❤4
One line has called every $ETH top and bottom this cycle, and almost nobody is watching it. EMA 50 Once we're breaking above this, its almost time for alts
👍9❤5🤣3
Robinhood Chain: How to Actually Trade the Memecoin Wave Everything you need to get started with memes on Robinhood and get ahead READ NOW 🚨 https://damidefi.substack.com/p/robinhood-chain-how-to-actually-trade
❤4🔥2
$1INCH is breaking out of the falling wedge on the 3D chart Five rejections off that upper trendline and we've finally pushed through I expect a retest of the broken line before continuation, and as long as we hold above it, the upside opens back up Target 1: $0.105 Target 2: $0.12 Target 3: $0.14 Invalidation: 3D close back inside the wedge below $0.075 Watch for the retest of the trendline to hold as support R…
👍7
$ONDO broke above the descending trendline on the 4H chart that's been capping it since early June Price pumped 35% off the $0.31 lows and is now pulling back to retest the breakout zone around $0.37–$0.38 I expect one more dip to retest that level before the next leg. If it holds, $0.48 is the target Target 1: $0.42 Target 2: $0.48 Invalidation: 4H close back below $0.36 Watch for the $0.37–$0.38 retest to hold…
❤11
$BTC is sitting just below the $65,500 resistance that's been rejecting the 3D chart repeatedly since the June lows Every bounce has stalled at this level. Until we get a 3D close above it, this is still a range, not a breakout The $60K support held and the rising trendline from the February lows is intact underneath higher lows building the whole way up. The structure is improving but the ceiling hasn't broken yet…
❤7
Building AI Trading Bots That Actually Work READ NOW 🚨 https://damidefi.substack.com/p/building-ai-trading-bots-that-actually
❤8👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DamiDefiinsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 849,082 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defi Insider by DamiDefi 🔭” (@DamiDefiinsider), 10,063 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DamiDefiinsider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.