4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,842–3,868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:12
3,865
+8
10 Aug 2026, 06:40
3,857
+12
7 Aug 2026, 16:51
3,845
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:31
3,845
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 3,865 subscribers
Avg views / post
655
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (29 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
8,514
Reactions total
206
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
317 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
28.1%
🔥
80
25.2%
👍
67
21.1%
⚡
37
11.7%
🤯
22
6.94%
custom 5330321861949539755
18
5.68%
custom 5215725958329282459
4
1.26%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DaliReddit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мы вошли в самый сложный период - август🥵, или добро пожаловать в "голодные игры" 😄
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Ох этот август - просадка, и так каждый год.
И кажется что это уже "всё пропало" и мы все "умрём в нише"😭
☝️Но давайте спокойно и без паники😤 разберёмся почему это происходит и почему это нормально.
Основная аудитория 😱OnlyFans - мужчины 18-4…
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Как мы писали в понедельник в новостях - Reddit отчитался за Q2 2026.
Для тех кто не в теме - Q2 это второй квартал, апрель-июнь.
Раз в три месяца Reddit как публичная компания обязан отчитываться перед акционерами и публиковать официальные цифры.
Так вот цифры за этот квартал вышли очень интересные.
➡️$805 млн выручки😳
➡️Во…
🌍 МИРОВЫЕ НОВОСТИ
➡️ Россия внесла Дурова в список террористов
Росфинмониторинг внёс основателя Telegram Павла Дурова в список террористов и экстремистов.
ФСБ предъявила обвинение в содействии терроризму и объявила в международный розыск.
Telegram в России работает со скоростью сниженной на 55% - государство продвигает замену MAX без шифрования.
Дуров в ответ поставил на аватар своего канала фото в образе террорист…
Вот что произошло с 28 июля по 3 августа 2026
📱REDDIT
➡️ Reddit побил все прогнозы - Q2 2026
Выручка $805 млн - рост 61% год к году и восьмой квартал подряд с ростом выше 60%.
Рекламная выручка $762 млн - рост 64%.
Прибыль $1.25 на акцию при прогнозе $0.97 - превышение на 28%.
Хаффман:
В эпоху всё более автоматизированного интернета ценность живой человеческой точки зрения никогда не была выше.
Пересечь отметку $…
Вакансия Redditолог в DaLiReddit
Если ты уже оставлял заявку или хочешь попасть в команду DaLiReddit - самое время обновить свою анкету и напомнить о себе .
Мы ищем того самого бойца, который готов влиться в процесс, пройти все невзгоды и баны, и развиваться вместе с нами.
Готов? Тогда обновляй анкету 😉
У нас отлетел юбилейный 750-й аккаунт 🎉
Идём на 1000 - как будем праздновать? 😄
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Сегодня утром увидела в таблице что забанился 750-й аккаунт😳
За 4 года мы перебанили столько аккаунто-денег что даже представить страшно 😅 и взяли этот расход на себя, никаким образом не перекладывая на клиента.
Сейчас снова сложный период банов,…
Вот что произошло с 21 по 27 июля 2026
📱 REDDIT
➡️ Reddit встроил AI-детектор прямо в редактор постов
Reddit начал показывать предупреждение прямо в редакторе ещё до публикации:
We noticed you may be using AI to assist you in writing your post. This is not against the rules, but this community generally does not seem to be a fan of AI content.
Не банит, не блокирует - просто предупреждает.
Триггером служит длинное…
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Недавно один из наших подписчиков @nyceane прислал крик души в формате песни 😄
Мне прям супер зашло и я приберегла для особого случая - вот как сегодня, когда нас снова
🔴накрыло волной банов🌊
Подпеваем 🎵
⚡️ Запустить Reddit трафик
🤝 Услуги и отзывы
📣 Реклама на канале
💬 Обсуждаем Reddit
💎Закрытое комьюнити для овнеров …
Вакансия Redditолог в DaLiReddit
Если ты уже оставлял заявку или хочешь попасть в команду DaLiReddit - самое время обновить свою анкету и напомнить о себе .
Мы ищем того самого бойца, который готов влиться в процесс, пройти все невзгоды и баны, и развиваться вместе с нами.
Готов? Тогда обновляй анкету 😉
Рубрика "Звезда недели" 🌟
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Знаете, баны в этот раз прям затянулись.
Давно не помню чтобы Reddit так долго и так навязчиво нас шпилил 😅
И вот что я подумала - это где-то в разряде масонов и плоской земли, но всё же... 😂
Может это из-за чемпионата мира по футболу?
В своё оправдание могу сказать что была у психиатра, просила табл…
Вот что произошло с 14 по 20 июля 2026
📱 REDDIT
➡️Волна банов продолжается - Reddit чистит платформу
Чистка ботов и нарушителей на Reddit не останавливается.
К уже привычным shadowban и перманентным банам добавилась новая волна временных 3-дневных блокировок аккаунтов.
За что дают 3-дневный бан:
нарушение Rule 2 - это официальное правило Reddit которое обязывает соблюдать правила конкретного сабреддита где ты пос…
Привет, мои коллеги-реддитологи🤝, амбициозные овнеры агентств🤑 и самые красивые модели ❤️
Сегодня суббота и не хочется грузить вас никакой информацией 😊
Просто хочу поддержать всех кто отчаялся из-за волны банов, просевшего трафика и прихода на OnlyFans, из-за ситуации в мире и футбола - будь он неладен 😄
Если ты делаешь что-то каждый день - у успеха не остаётся выбора
Хороших выходных ❤️
⚡️ Запустить Reddit т…
🔥10❤9👍4custom 53303218619495397551
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DaliReddit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 184,273 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DaliReddit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@domainme named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reddit от DaLiReddit Agency” (@DaliReddit), 3,865 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaliReddit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.