Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دلقکای حق گو 🤡

Channel

دلقکای حق گو 🤡

@Dalghake_HaghGoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,058subscribers

-90 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001755592609
TypeChannel
Username@Dalghake_HaghGoo
Descriptionعقاید جمعی از دلقکان حق گو اینجا رسانه نیست سیرکه اگر تعصبی و فشاری هستی اینجا مناسبت نیست ! لینک دونیت چنل ادرس ولت تون(Ton) هرکی عشقش کشید هرچقد بزنه هرکیم نزد فدای سرش UQDti9mOkArSIeUsUeHwy9UIzS-BGlsT4GCZq58PqO1eOa4A پشتیبانی : @Dalghake_Sirk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dalghake_HaghGoo

Growth

14,05814,14814,1037 August 2026 — 14,148 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,120 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,102 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,092 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,084 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,065 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,058 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,045–14,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 13:5414,058-7
14 Aug 2026, 21:1814,065-19
13 Aug 2026, 12:3414,084-8
12 Aug 2026, 15:1314,092-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:4214,102-18
10 Aug 2026, 11:2514,120-6
9 Aug 2026, 12:4114,126-17
8 Aug 2026, 11:3114,143-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:3114,148no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2414,148first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.77%
avg views ÷ 14,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
530
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held55 (3 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total29,148
Reactions total806
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
17,500
Videos
3,970
Links
885

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

806 reactions across 51 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣46657.8%
👍16720.7%
💔739.06%
🖕435.33%
❤‍🔥313.85%
👎232.85%
🗿30.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 806reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 55 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dalghake_HaghGoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026

نیما جان تو آبرو نداری؟ - شطرنجی

🤣7

16 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC132 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026

تا حالا کیر شطرنجی رو خوردید؟ -جاکیر

🗿3👍1

16 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC129 viewsread 16 August 2026

اونی ک لایک زده بیا پیوی داداش صحبت کنیم فک کنم گذشته سختی داشتی - شطرنجی

16 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC129 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026

تا حالا خودتو انگشت کردی؟ - شطرنجی

🤣7👍5

16 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC162 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026

تا حالا جق زدی؟ -دلقک بازرگان

🤣7👍2

16 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC219 viewsread 16 August 2026

رابطتتون حضوریه یا لانگ؟ -دلقک بازرگان

15 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC303 views19 reactionsread 16 August 2026

هما = اسکایلر -دلقک بازرگان

👍16🤣3

14 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC368 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026

یمدت نبودم بازرگان هنوز داره کص میگه؟ - دلقک مخفی

🤣16👍13

14 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC360 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026

خداروشکر جزو اون 20 درصدم -جاکیر

👍5🤣4

14 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC391 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026

طبق تحقیقات 80 پسرا وقتی وارد رابطه با دختر جدیدی میشن ارتباطشونو با رفیق های پسرشون قطع میکنن و بیشتر سعی میکنن با دختره وقت بگذرونن ! -دلقک بازرگان

👍7👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Dalghake_HaghGoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اخبار جنگ | مدیا هاب
@Media_HB · 142,387
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
FootBad
@iFootBad · 95,301
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
RapTV
@raptv · 377,927
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
021NEWZ | 𝐑𝐚𝐩 🫪
@Newz021 · 161,428
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 179,237
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دلقکای حق گو 🤡” (@Dalghake_HaghGoo), 14,058 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dalghake_HaghGoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.