Channel
@Daily_Evola
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,509subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002117979977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Daily_Evola |
| Created | 23 February 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Daily_Evola |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 1,509 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 1,502 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 1,503 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 1,503 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,482 |
| Reactions total | 188 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
412 reactions across 19 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 120 | 29.1% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 18.0% | |
| 💯 | 64 | 15.5% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 12.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 3.88% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 3.88% | |
| 🌚 | 13 | 3.16% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 2.43% | |
| 🖕 | 9 | 2.18% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.971% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.971% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 0.971% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.728% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.728% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.728% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.485% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.485% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.485% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.485% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.485% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 1.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 412reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Personal: There is really no pride today in being human; most people are only proud of degenerating into mere animals. In their behaviour, in their standards, in their world-view, in the ideals they worship, in the image they have of themselves—it is all the same. Our age should be called the age of Des-Menschlichen-Dämmerung, if German may allow me to put it thus; it is the crepuscule of anything human and its activ…
👍18
[Around 1921-1922] I reached such a low point that I had planned to bring my very life to an end—I was about twenty-three at the time. I only avoided such an outcome […] thanks to something that I might almost describe as an enlightenment: my discovery of an early Buddhist text [= Root Sūtra]. The text consists of a speech in which the Buddha progressively reveals the forms of attachment which each ‘noble son’ on the…
❤13🔥4❤🔥2👍2🙏2
Personal: The amount of times that you meet non-European people who know about Europe’s history and culture more than its sons and daughters is quite unbelievable sometimes. For instance, you would actually find students who study English Literature at some university while still ignorant of someone like Samuel Johnson. You ofttimes happen to find it difficult to believe this. Of course this is while the Right is nev…
🤔16💯9👍1👎1
«In a world controlled by fire And a world controlled by fire Psychotic preachers thrive They use the waves to bind us They use the screens to blind us I joined headless forces, they told us what to do We worked, we fought, we bled A cogwheel in the system, a ghost in the machine In my private thoughts only pain felt real I am a man With strong regrets I followed great deceivers Believed in headless leaders They pl…
👍7
Personal: Everyone wants to be saved by something; the salvific desire has become so deeply rooted that everyone seeks something into which he fancies outsourcing his whole existence. As much as individualism is spoken of, most people from all kinds and colours are still as—if not worse so—collectivist as they have ever been throughout history. But today things are worse only because hypocrisy is more ingrained, and …
❤🔥10👍2👏1
A thing of the Middle Ages, a thing of barbarians—naturally—to fight for the “way of God” and for such aberrant “metaphysical” fantasies; a most holy thing, instead, to fight for a piece of land, for the pride of the “nation,” for the duty of the “citizen,” and for the cry of the “fatherland!” The earth has always had need of blood: and he who should measure the values of the other shore, beyond the fumes of rhetoric…
❤12🔥2
The cover should have been something like this. It is not like Evola is writing an encomium.
💯33❤2👍2🥴2👎1
Civiltà Americana.
🔥19❤🔥4👍3🥰2😁1🆒1
Every higher culture and every primordial ordering of the State was characterized by the synthesis of two powers: the temporal and the spiritual, the royal and the sacral. The sovereigns possessed a “solar” character; in them, power was spirit and spirit was power. Even in relation to the divine, they maintained the virile and commanding character of leaders and heroes. Upon this rests the pagan conception of the wor…
🔥9👀3👏3❤1
The Middle Ages can essentially be summed up as an abnormal development of the bourgeois element and its interests and activities, in relation to the higher elements of the medieval hierarchy: a development that has taken on the proportions of a veritable cancer. It is the bourgeois who has ridiculed the ideals of the old chivalric ethic. It was the bourgeoisie who, as the “new breed” despised by Dante, first gave th…
💯15❤3🌚1
Worthy of the name of man—vir—is he who has his own standard within himself, who is active in the face of reality, refuses to submit to its violence, knows how to direct it or, when that becomes impossible, to block its path.
🔥22👍2
Another sidenote: Any serious man is supposed to know German. The Anglo-Saxon sphere is so dumb to only read in English. Don’t be illiterates.
🔥18😢4🖕3😁3😭2🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Daily_Evola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 435,742 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Julius Evola” (@Daily_Evola), 1,509 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Daily_Evola.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.