Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Да!

@Dagestan_analytics

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,415subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357722474
TypeChannel
Username@Dagestan_analytics
Created4 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dagestan_analytics

Growth

5,4155,4265,420.56 August 2026 — 5,426 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,426 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,422 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,415 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,413–5,428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:355,415-7
10 Aug 2026, 11:545,422-2
7 Aug 2026, 21:155,424-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:005,426no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:565,426first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁13841.7%
👍6319.0%
🔥3610.9%
216.34%
👎216.34%
🤯164.83%
😱103.02%
🤔103.02%
👏82.42%
🤬51.51%
🤩20.604%
😢10.302%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2025 to 12 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 May 2025, 20:41 UTC≈9,460 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вот вы в работу ИТС не верите, а она признана на всероссийском уровне!

😁128😱8🤔6

14 Apr 2025, 10:59 UTC≈11,500 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Буханка хлеба в Махачкале скоро будет стоить 1 доллар https://t.me/tolko_fakti_dagestan/38560

😁12👎9👍32😱1

14 Apr 2025, 07:23 UTC≈9,130 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пока глава Дагестана пытается выбить ещё 10 млрд рублей на строительство мусороперерабатывающих заводов, настоящие менеджеры уже давно внедрили безотходную модель управления: 1. Назначаете людей на должности, чтобы они для вас воровали. 2. Через пять лет сажаете их в тюрьму и отжимаете там с них даже "их" процент. 3. Назначаете новых людей, пристраивая "отработанных" куда-нибудь в ДГПУ. #нам_пишут

🔥26😁17👍101👏1

14 Apr 2025, 06:59 UTC≈7,370 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Так майнинг-фермы в Дагестане - пятигорские или московские? https://t.me/askrasul/62647

😁16

14 Apr 2025, 05:52 UTC≈5,470 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Уголовное дело возбуждено на Викторию Гаджиеву, но выгнать из Общественной Палаты Дагестана упорно пытаются Азизбека Черкесова. Причем без всяких видимых причин.

👍19😁10👎1

14 Apr 2025, 05:14 UTC≈4,580 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @chernovik_newPhoto

Следственные органы продолжают расследование дела «Экспресс-продукта». Кировский районный суд Махачкалы определил фигурантам меры пресечения | Черновик https://chernovik.net/news/sledstvennye-organy-prodolzhayut-rassledovanie-dela-ekspress-produkta-kirovskiy-rayonnyy-sud

2

13 Apr 2025, 13:12 UTC≈4,100 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @remarka_dag

Удивительно: критику не любит никто, а за развитие ратуют все! Так запомните, ребята: развития, без критики и переосмысления настоящего не бывает! Все пророки с критики начинали! А еще: на себя тоже надо смотреть пристально духовными глазами. Для, этого суфии использовали халват - яму для, уединения. Можно и в собственном высокопалатном кабинете запереться. Но не с бутылкой бренди. А китайского чая. И долго так молча

👍18😁3👎21🤬1

12 Apr 2025, 20:29 UTC≈4,020 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Добрый вечер. Интересная новость, с толстым намёком на то, кому выгодно нынешнее ужасное положение дел с электроэнергией в республике. И кому не выгодно попытки наведения порядка, чтобы коротких замыканий и отключений стало на 90% меньше и кому не выгодна борьба с майнингом? По данным «Спросите у Расула», на последней встрече главы Дагестана Сергея Меликова с председателем правления ПАО «Россети» Андреем Рюминым, гл

👍5🤬4🤔21😁1😱1

12 Apr 2025, 17:07 UTC≈3,260 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чтобы пересажать друзей, им нужно сперва отрезать язык, чтобы чего не сболтнули, а заодно и пальцы отрезать, чтобы написать не смогли https://t.me/chernovik/84418

😁15👍1

12 Apr 2025, 05:14 UTC≈3,040 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как мы понимаем, никто из республиканских чиновников не отрицает, что в освоении 1,8 млрд рублей, выделенных на создание ООО "Дагмясо" могут быть "маленькие недочёты". Однако они настаивают на том, что случились эти "недочёты" при участии какого-то другого директора, а не Юсуфдина Юсуфова. Что же, внесите это в протокол.

😁91

11 Apr 2025, 18:38 UTC≈2,950 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Юсуфдин Юсуфов был назначен первым руководителем республиканского государственного ООО "Дагмясо", которое активно продвигал Абдулмуслимов. Первый директор - это директор через которого проходили все стартовые расходы - строительство, закупка оборудования, монтаж, инфраструктура. Сумма этих расходов оценивалась в 1,8 млрд рублей

🤯14😁6🔥3👍1

11 Apr 2025, 18:34 UTC≈2,710 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

КФХ "Бозторгай" семьи Аджековых освоила 45 млн субсидий на создание производства по переработке мяса. Кто хоть раз пробовал это мясо поставьте лайк. Остальное - разговоры в пользу бедных.

😁24👏7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Dagestan_analytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 642,957 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КРИМИНАЛЬНАЯ ХРОНИКА
@criminal_chronicle · 121,802
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
СТРЕЛЫ КАЗБЕКА - СКФО
@streli_kazbeka · 128,261
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
ХАМЗАЕВ
@sultanhamzaev · 271,042
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Да!” (@Dagestan_analytics), 5,415 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dagestan_analytics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.