Channel
@DWTL8888
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681635001 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DWTL8888 |
| Created | 16 August 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DWTL8888 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 70 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 71 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 73 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 75 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 76 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:49 | 76 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 16 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 54.8% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 35.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2022 to 4 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
看完上面的内容，估计懂的都懂了，不懂的自己慢慢摸索吧 这些内容完全免费分享给大家 这项目毕竟是以我自己多年的经验和思路总结出来的，我也会不自觉的忽略一下新手遇到的问题，习惯性的觉得很多东西一目了然了，可是对于第一次接触的人，可能完全无法理解。这个项目有什么问题再慢慢总结补充吧. 然后在这里提醒，那些自动炒群的脚本软件，僵尸号，炒群的机器人号，市面上是可以直接买得到的，但是，在飞机上面鱼龙混杂，自己小心注意就行了，别没开始割韭菜就被别人割韭菜了
👍1🔥1
1
❤6👍2😁1
1
❤3
简单讲讲，如果在Telegram上面，混得久的人，一定都被拉进过一下所谓的标有置换、生息、增量、挖矿合约群、智能合约、Defi、Swap的诈骗群 没错，我们就是在这个基础上，升级，优化，去引导鬼佬充值，我们不坑自己人，同时做到0风险，原理和国内做的火币搬砖套利差不多，几个福建小伙子坑了国人1.3亿，我们用这个方法去给鬼佬降维打击！ 火币HT搬砖套利：http://blockchain.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0710/c417685-31779096.html 风险问题，你只要割的是洋韭菜，就没有任何的风险问题，因为根本找不到你！！！！更不可能跨国来找你！！！ 说说这类群的套路 首先这类群，一定会有很多僵尸粉，不说话，不退群的那种，一般过万，因为要增加可信度，造成一万多人的群，不可能是骗人的吧，这类的错觉。 自动假聊脚本，会有100多个人自动聊天，看起来比较逼真，像真人在闲聊一样，顺便带上几句做这个…
❤7👍3
欢迎访问本频道 假如你来到本频道, 如果是抱着好奇心来看看, 我劝你离开, 不要把时间浪费在这里, 世界那么大,劳驾看点健康积极向上的。 ——————————————————- 假如你来到本频道,是想找一套完整的黑产项目, 是的 你找对了地方。我制作这一系列教程,全部以自身经历进行分享 特点：（必须暴利,必须风险低,必须长久,必须单人可做,不靠关系走门路,不重投资，只需一部电脑） 除了我从事的这个行业,还有几个行业能达到括号里的要求? 如果有,麻烦联系我,转账重谢. ——————————————————- 做黑灰产我不敢说你100%赚钱，但是我们新的项目是真的暴利，堪称“全自动印钞机”的项目-【洋韭菜计划】在这里全部免费分享给大家 频道管理员：https://t.me/BNBOfficialArbitrag 下面的东西比较长，感兴趣的耐心看完
👍5❤1🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @DWTL8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DWTL8888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“洋韭菜计划，一个月后解散” (@DWTL8888), 70 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DWTL8888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.