Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MCYT TRIGGER #кф #Mammamia #RestInPieceGDZ #GDZo7 #SupportTubbosDog #УТоммиМаленькийХуй #ТолстожопогоКвакитиВМассы #ппдсс

@DSMPtrigger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,348subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002085509043
TypeChannel
Username@DSMPtrigger
Created7 November 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DSMPtrigger

Growth

1,3471,3481,347.57 Aug 2026, 19:49 — 1,347 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:21 — 1,347 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:38 — 1,348 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:498 Aug 2026, 08:38
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,347–1,348 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:381,348+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:211,347no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:491,347first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 1,348 subscribers
Avg views / post
610
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,534
Reactions total790
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

941 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22924.3%
🔥12413.2%
🍓11512.2%
🤝11111.8%
❤‍🔥555.84%
🤯495.21%
😁333.51%
🐳323.40%
313.29%
👎293.08%
👍262.76%
🤡181.91%
😨171.81%
😢161.70%
🥰151.59%
👏121.28%
💩90.956%
🤮80.85%
😍50.531%
🤬50.531%
1 further kind20.213%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 941reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DSMPtrigger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC248 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥: Триггер на ЭТО. Блять, кто дал тебе проход в интернет #тейк

28😨17❤‍🔥3🍓1🐳1

Signed j et посик

4 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC389 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Так ребята я понимаю что вам нужно отстоять свою позицию по поводу удаленного триггера но ваши тейки не связаны со мсют фд Мною было принято решение снести пост нахуй дабы утихомирить нарастающий конфликт

👎2711🤮8💩3❤‍🔥1🤡1🤬1

Signed гдз

2 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC575 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥: триггер на русофобию в твиттере. Объясняю, у Квакити же есть КСМП так вот, он ругал немецких создателей контента, что они ни разу не зашли на сервер, тип: "Зачем вы соглашались если ни разу не зашли?" Так вот многие рус. фаны без агрессии и всего такого начали писать, можно ли рус. создателям контента по Майну зайти на сервер? И потекло говно по трубам, Твитторовские начали писать посты: "Если вы за, чтобы рус. к

🤯49😢16🤝14🔥5💩32🍓2🥰2

Signed Dream

1 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC485 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥: триггер на джека чё это #тейк

22🔥4

Signed Dream

1 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC500 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥: триггер на ру фандом мсюта в принцепе В большинстве, ру фандом Дрим СМП, анстейбла, лайфстил, кьюсмп имеет в себе столько расизма, мизогинии, ксенофобии, сексизма и много чего ещё, что мне рыгать блять хочется В ру фандоме, схуялито, романтизировали и нормализировали порно с шото и лоли (с детьми по факту), ломание чужих границ (поставили бы вы себя на место любого кк, когда десятки людей желают вас изнасиловать,

❤‍🔥33🤡1711🤬4🔥3🍓2🤝2🐳1

Signed Dream

22 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC781 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥: Всем пр триггер на рукм шарплоу Уже писали про них тейк, но мне пох я крутая и нончалант Заебали чуваки который на русском спамчт в чате. И ладно бы один раз пошутили, мол, изихи шарп сказал бурмалда, и дело с концами, но сейчас это переходит все границы. Так ещё и audacity ьлять ныть якобы "ыыыы ебанутые модеры, и что что я на русском писал, а в правилах написано только на англ". Я уже нахуй не могу просто Но с

🤝3212👍6🔥3

Signed Dream

21 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC808 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥: я не автор тейка, но как же я сука с ним согласен https://t.me/DSMPtrigger/21629 Шарплоу фаны, за частую, меня бесят. Именно что в ру фандоме. Нарушений личных границ кк я трогать не буду, так уж и быть, но меня бесит этот ебучий юмор по типу "когда хотел высунуть но понял что он будет хорошей матерью🤣🤣🤣" или рандомные звуки, что должны быть "типа смешно 2022🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣" сука, сраку надорву над видео "нам выезжать в

23🔥4🥰2🍓1👎1

Signed Dream

21 Jul 2026, 19:10 UTC698 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥: триггер на фанатов шарплоу. они ебанутые. оч противно от них #тейк

296👍6😍5🍓1👎1🔥1🥰1

Signed Dream

20 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC757 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥: триггер на это💔 дно пробито уже 8 раз #тейк

🐳275🔥2🍓1

Signed гдз

19 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC660 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥: Привет, меня бесят большинство тгк (особенно те, которые юю центрик), потому что они опять-таки не ставят нормальные кредиты и оставляют тупой "?" или оставляют пинтерест перезаливщиков. Я как факт знаю, что я писал похожий тейк, но повторение мать ученье. не анон 🧇 Мамбо #тейк

😁26🤝122🔥2💋1

Signed Dream

19 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC694 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💥:Да я типичная толерашка, но я не понимаю эту хуйню с тем, что люди (да, с твиттера) хотят отмены априори не опасных личностей, которые просто шутканули хуйню (а потом ИзвинилисЬ). Эти отменяторы очевидно недолюбливают стримеров и хотят убрать их с лица интернета потому что что это за пиздец?. Чел пошутил один раз про гендер транс персоны - «почему мы не отменяем этого человека????!!?!!Это трансфобия». Чел шутканул

🤝25😁7🍓5🐳1💩1🔥1

Signed гдз

19 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC686 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥: триггер на ларп-иста. Дошутились блять 🍁Неанон аутизм бойчик #тейк

🔥51👏11❤‍🔥8👍3🍓1🐳1

Signed Dream

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DSMPtrigger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 230,859 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MCYT TRIGGER #кф #Mammamia #RestInPieceGDZ #GDZo7 #SupportTubbosDog #УТоммиМаленькийХуй #ТолстожопогоКвакитиВМассы #ппдсс” (@DSMPtrigger), 1,348 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DSMPtrigger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.