Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

► درر الشيخ الفاضل عدنان المصقري حفظه الله ورعاه |

@DRR_5_5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,044subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395828106
TypeChannel
Username@DRR_5_5
CreatedBetween 1 September 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DRR_5_5

Growth

2,0392,0452,0426 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,039 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,044 subscribers2,0446 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,038–2,046 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:462,044+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:212,039-6
6 Aug 2026, 11:212,045no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:192,045first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.3%
avg views ÷ 2,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,037
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC715 viewsread 7 August 2026

أشد الناس عذابًا يوم القيامة المصوِّرون؛. متفق عليه فلم يقل: أشد الناس عذابًا يوم القيامة الزناة ولا الشُّرَّاب، إنما قال: المصوِّرون. فاتقوا الله، هذه فتنة عظيمة نبتعد عنها، ولا نصوِّر، ولا نقبل صورًا في جوالاتنا، ولا بيوتنا، ولا في مساجدنا. لأن الصور منكر. وانا رسالة في تحريم الصور ذكرنا عشرات الأدلة على تحريمها عموما. والله الموفق. 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

1 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026

فمن ينشر فوائد العلماء والشيوخ مع وجود صورهم واقع في كبيرة من كبائر الذنوب. 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

26 Jul 2026, 12:41 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 7 August 2026

فيا قوم بارك الله فيكم، اعلموا أن الناس بحاجة إلى العلم، بحاجة إلى تعليمهم : قول الله، وقول الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم ، وليسوا بحاجة إلى صور العلماء. 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

25 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 7 August 2026

فقد بلغنا علم النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، والصحابة، والتابعين، والبخاري، ومسلم، وما نعرف صورهم، وما صوَّروا ولا تصوَّروا، ولا أذنوا بالرسم. 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

24 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 7 August 2026

فيا أخي، الصورة لا بركة فيها، ولا في دعوة فيها صور. الصور حرام، كبيرة من الكبائر، من أسباب دخول النار، من أسباب اللعنة. أشد الناس عذابًا يوم القيامة المصوِّرون؛. متفق عليه 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

23 Jul 2026, 04:41 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 7 August 2026

📂| قال الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله : |[ واللّٰه تعالى جعل الأعمال الصالحة عبادة والعبادة لا تصلح إلا له ]| 📓|( كلمة تم تفريغها في : ١٤٤٠ هـ )

22 Jul 2026, 03:41 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026

فالتصوير حرام، والصور تذهب بالبركة أو تقللها. فننصح بعدم الصور، وعدم التصوير، والبعد عن ذلك؛ لأن الأحاديث في لعن المصوِّر، وأنه من أشد الناس عذابًا يوم القيامة، وأن الصور حرام، وأن صاحب الصور ملعون — أحاديث كثيرة بلغت التواتر في المعنى — في تحريم الصور، والأمر بطمسها. 📂الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله 📓.#سلسلة_المسائل_المهمة_

9 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC≈3,020 viewsread 7 August 2026

📁قال الشيخ عدنان المصقري حفظه الله : فيا أهل السنة إنما رفعكم الله بالعلم، فلا تضيعوا أوقاتكم في غيره، فاحفظوا أوقاتكم للعلم، فتعلموا العلم، واطلبوا العلم، وأجِلُّوا أهل العلم، واحفظوا العلم أينما كنتم، فقد يسر الله في هذا الزمان أئمة ناصحين، وعلماء صادقين، وكتبا لأهل الحديث، فيستطيع الإنسان أن يطلب العلم أينما كان مع تعلقه بالعلماء وسؤاله لأهل العلم. 📓نصيحة للإخوة السلفيين في سيرلانكا صـ ١٢

9 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC≈2,330 viewsread 7 August 2026

📁قال الشيخ #عدنان_المصقري حفظه الله : تفقه في الدين ﷲ تعالى، فالعلم يغيض الشيطان وجنوده، فقد قال السلف: إن الفقيه أضر على إبليس من العابد، لأن العالم ينفع الناس، أما العابد لا ينفع إلا نفسه. 📓نصيحة للإخوة السلفيين في سيرلانكا صـ ١١

9 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 7 August 2026

📁قال الشيخ #عدنان_المصقري حفظه الله : فمن لمز أصحاب رسول الله سواء جملة أو تفصيلا برجعية أو فسق أو طعن في واحد منهم فاعلم أنه قليل الأدب مع الله ومع نبيه، سفيه الحلم، مريض القلب، وهذا تراه عند الرافضة والشيعة والإخوان المسلمين والسرورية. 📓القول المتين في علامات أهل البدع والحزبيين صـ ٨٤

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DRR_5_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 252,492 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“► درر الشيخ الفاضل عدنان المصقري حفظه الله ورعاه |” (@DRR_5_5), 2,044 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DRR_5_5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.