Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DON BOWL&HOOKAH

@DON_BOWL_HOOKAH

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,886subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002229437435
TypeChannel
Username@DON_BOWL_HOOKAH
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DON_BOWL_HOOKAH

Growth

1,8861,9641,9257 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,886 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,874–1,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:181,886-10
11 Aug 2026, 01:071,896-68
7 Aug 2026, 20:451,964no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:081,964first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 1,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
310
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held8 (9 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total619
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 57s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2834.1%
🔥2631.7%
1417.1%
👏44.88%
💘44.88%
❤‍🔥22.44%
💩11.22%
🤡11.22%
🤮11.22%
🥰11.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC216 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @m1kehookahPhoto

А вот и я теперь покажу новый Urban от Don Hookah Очень уж долго ждал пока фон приедет 🥲 но ожидание того стоило. Стильный, красивый, незаконно дешевый. Ррц 6500, при этом у нас тут интересная продувка, по принципу обратного клапана и блюдце на притирке. Поздравляю ребят с новым крутым кальяном в бюджетном сегменте. Продолжайте круто делать и дальше ♥️

🔥32🥰1

20 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC403 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @teplo_peredachaPhoto

ТЕПЛЫЙ ОБЗОР КАЛЬЯНА DON URBAN Пришло время поговорить про кальян от Don Hookah - Urban. Производитель: Urban - модель для тех, кто любит дорогие и продуманные вещи, но не готов переплачивать за громкие названия. Мы взяли элементы, которые обычно оставляют для более высокого сегмента, и сделали их частью кальяна среднего класса - без компромиссов по ощущениям и удобству в использовании. Urban ощущается дороже, чем

👍32❤‍🔥2🔥2💩1🤡1🤮1

8 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC442 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zapKMTMVideo

Ловите распаковку и быстрый розыгрыш! Подписываемся на DON пишем любой комент под этим постом и 10.07. Определю победителя!

👍231

22 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC796 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

URBAN Заношу вам красивого немного сегодня 👌 Стритовый Urban от DON выглядит, учитывая его прайс, конечно чудно. Притирка блюдца, коннектор на притирке, приятная тяга и обработка. Шо еще надо то за 6500? Чашечка от Telamon как всегда кстати❤️ А вы что думаете, надо брать?

👏43👍1

18 Jun 2026, 05:56 UTC702 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Распаковка POV + мини-обзор: DON Urban • блюдце на притирке • система продува по принципу обратного клапана • диффузор из нержи • фирменная притирка под шланг Характеристики: • высота на колбе Craft — 520 мм • диаметр шахты — 13 мм • диаметр погружной — 13 мм • длина мундштука — 300 мм РРЦ — 6500 рублей, что супер достойно для такой модели. Как вам кальян?

🔥11

16 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC519 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

DON «URBAN» Эта пуля - 1:1 с предыдущей моделью бренда «AESTETHIC», только с другим исполнением внешнего вида шахты. Если та пушка была одной из самых классных «бюджеток» 2025 года, то эта рискует стать такой же в 2026, ведь она ещё дешевле. DON сделали хороший кальян из нержавейки и полиацеталя со средне-плотной тягой. Стоит вернуть диффузор на место - тяга становится ощутимо легче. Дизайн приятный, интересный и,

6💘4👍1🔥1

10 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC540 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как выбрать кальян, если не хочется тратить много? Рассказал за полторы минуты в новом коротком видео. А еще показал пару моих новых кальяна — REAPER 2.0 от ML CLAN и URBAN от DON HOOKAH. Смотреть и лайкать тут: — shorts — reels — клипы — tiktok Доброго вечерочка, друже!

9 Jun 2026, 17:36 UTC597 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Don Hookah Urban А это вообще законно делать такой кальян за 6500? На мой взгляд эта модель выглядит явно дороже, чем стоит на самом деле. Это у меня только руки добрались, потом ещё нормально покажу как соберу и покурю на нём. А вы что скажете? Как вам внешне? Ценник топ?

🔥9

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DON_BOWL_HOOKAH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DON BOWL&HOOKAH” (@DON_BOWL_HOOKAH), 1,886 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DON_BOWL_HOOKAH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.