LAX.EB Route Performance to China Telecom and Flexible Options For information · 2026-11-14 05:54 UTC We have recently identified intermittent packet loss and latency fluctuations on our LAX.EB routes destined for China Telecom. Our network engineering team has traced the root cause to upstream peering congestion and routing instability within China Unicom's backbone, which currently falls outside any carrier-level …

Channel
tail -f /var/log/DMIT.log
@DMIT_INC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,658subscribers
+668 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001356752668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DMIT_INC |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DMIT_INC |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 6,658 | +32 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 10:47 | 6,626 | +10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 6,616 | +13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 6,603 | +15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 6,588 | +33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 6,555 | +15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 6,540 | +24 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 6,516 | +11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 6,505 | +11 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 6,494 | +6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:48 | 6,488 | +31 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:36 | 6,457 | +9 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 6,448 | +22 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 6,426 | +14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 6,412 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 6,404 | +21 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 6,383 | +90 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:45 | 6,293 | +60 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 6,233 | +99 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 6,134 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.3%
- avg views ÷ 6,658 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,750
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (12 June 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 30,010 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (87.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
System behavior changes following Client Area security updates For information · 2026-11-14 03:57 UTC DMIT has recently deployed several security updates and patches to the Client Area. Please note the following changes to system behavior: 1. DMIT has moved Private Key generation from the server side to the client browser. Keys automatically created during ordering are no longer temporarily stored on the server. 2…
🟠 AS9929 Los Angeles Backbone Fault Affecting LAX Eyeball Major · Identified · 2026-11-10 17:54 UTC Identified 2026-11-10 17:54 UTC Note: From a network architecture standpoint, China Unicom AS9929 does not meet the criteria for a "premium" network. It functions as a lightly loaded IP BGP network with limited border redundancy. Due to high load and insufficient redundancy across the AS9929 backbone and border, this…
🟢 HKG EB IP Transit circuit maintenance Minor · Completed · 2026-11-01 06:37 UTC Completed 2026-11-01 06:37 UTC The maintenance is complete. In progress 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC Maintenance has started. Scheduled 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC Degraded performance on HKG EB, due to IP Transit circuit maintenance. ETR: Nov 3, 2026
🟢 Wait times increased for DMIT Customer Support Informational · Resolved · 2026-11-05 10:27 UTC Resolved 2026-11-05 10:27 UTC The customer support has returned to normal operational status. Migrated 2026-10-27 04:22 UTC DMIT Customer Support is currently experiencing high load. We recommend utilizing self-support functions first to reduce wait times.
🟢 LAX AS9929 backbone elevated packet loss Minor · Resolved · 2026-10-22 07:30 UTC Resolved 2026-10-22 07:30 UTC China Unicom has confirmed that this issue is resolved. Monitoring 2026-10-21 03:25 UTC DMIT has not received any updates from China Unicom. However, we observed that packet loss stopped within 6 hours of its occurrence. Investigating 2026-10-20 06:38 UTC DMIT has detected elevated packet loss on the A…
🟢 Scheduled maintenance: Online kernel patch for CVE-2026-99999 Minor · Completed · 2026-10-21 03:31 UTC Completed 2026-10-21 03:31 UTC All nodes have been hot-patched for CVE-2026-99999. In progress 2026-10-19 08:00 UTC Maintenance has started. Scheduled 2026-10-19 08:00 UTC DMIT will deploy a self-compiled online kernel patch to mitigate CVE-2026-99999 to all host nodes across all regions between October 19 and …
🟢 Scheduled upgrade for Tokyo region software and kernel Minor · Completed · 2026-10-21 03:26 UTC Completed 2026-10-21 03:26 UTC Kernel and software updates have been completed for all nodes in Tokyo. In progress 2026-10-19 08:00 UTC Maintenance has started. Scheduled 2026-10-19 08:00 UTC The software and kernel in the Tokyo region are one major version behind other regions. A software and kernel upgrade is sched…
Starting from October 15, 2026, customers who register through social media accounts will need to set a login password. Service impact · 2026-10-14 23:34 UTC Starting October 15, 2026, customers who registered through social accounts and have not set a password will be required to do so. A prompt to set a password will appear upon login, with a grace period of 7 to 30 days depending on registration date. Failure to …
Channel name was changed to «tail -f /var/log/DMIT.log»
Transition to Self-Managed IP Addresses Service impact · 2026-09-29 04:48 UTC Update: Self-Service Switching to Cogent IP and Billing Details The full text is on the status page.
🟢 CN2 GIA access point degradation in CoreSite LA2 Minor · Resolved · 2026-09-18 16:36 UTC China Telecom stated the issue at their CoreSite LA location has been resolved. DMIT has reloaded the routes received from China Telecom CoreSite LA.
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @DMIT_INC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@DMIT_INC edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nodeseekc · 40,773
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
@projectXtls · 30,596
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
@vps_xhq · 50,910
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@ShadowrocketNews · 47,283
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@github_2dust · 93,000
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tail -f /var/log/DMIT.log” (@DMIT_INC), 6,658 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DMIT_INC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.