TG最强社工库组合横空出世 强烈推荐以下四库⬇️⬇️ 🤫五月天社工库机器人 https://t.me/sgk250bot?start=5143791 🤫二号社工库机器人 没有积分,无限使用 https://t.me/SGK250_bot 强烈推荐👍:最好用的社工库。数据完整高达几十亿,查询出的内容丰富使用方便速度快准确高,猎魔补齐功能居多数据庞大。付费客服靠谱出单还效率!信誉至上的品牌 🤫76号档案室机器人 https://t.me/DT76Hbot?start=invite_331227448 数据庞大,响应快,功能也很多,来自不同库的总结,使用效果极佳 🤫免费开户机器人 https://t.me/aisgk1?start=1068 数据庞大,响应快,效果好,可以签到,可以猎魔,新手小白必备神器 ✅太极社工库 https://t.me/mfsgktjbot?start=331227448 多功能一体化机器人功能多 数据庞大…

Channel
开盒社工库开户机器人🤖
@DKGGMOD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,374subscribers
-844 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001755272497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DKGGMOD |
| Description | 分享高质量免费机器人,频道分享内容都是频道主亲自使用后给你们说出来我的使用感受。全部都是真实评价没有任何夸大其词 加入频道跟着小编走避雷垃圾机器人👏 招广 @EDGZmjjKK |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DKGGMOD |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 5,374 | -856 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 6,230 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 6,218 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 6,218 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 70.3%
- avg views ÷ 5,374 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,780
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.058%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (9 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 71,798 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 55
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 58.6% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 34.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
频道分享过的机器人都是频道主亲自使用后给你们说出来我的使用感受。都有留言这个机器人很好可以签到数据很多,这个机器人诈骗过推荐指数1星。全部都是真实评价没有任何夸大其词 加入频道跟着小编走带你们避雷垃圾机器人👏 基本上,市面上90%机器人都被我分享出来了,置顶都是小编亲身体验感觉良好给各位亲朋好友带来推荐没有夸大其词。
👍3❤2🔥2
🤫星盾社工库 https://t.me/XD_SGK_bot?start=ref_689980009 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:全网最全快递订单查询机器人,懂行的都在用。可以签到数据好用
👍6
💥太极社工库 https://t.me/mfsgktjbot?start=331227448 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:多功能一体化机器人 功能多 数据庞大 响应快
🤫免费开户机器人 https://t.me/aisgk1?start=1068 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:数据庞大,响应快,效果好,可以签到,可以猎魔,新手小白必备神器
🤫查档王机器人 https://t.me/tianjigebot?start=MzMxMjI3NDQ4 推荐指数:⭐️ 小编留言:数据跟情报局一样,说简单点就是情报局的分身,不建议找他家的人工付费客服有欺诈行为
🤫Kali机器人 https://t.me/mfsgk?start=831874 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:新手必备,数据庞大,猎魔补齐都有。十分推荐,小编力推
🤫8P机器人 https://t.me/SGK8Pbot?start=aAGG4G2T3M3DyubRpHr9NdpR 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:数据庞大,响应快,可以签到邀请人有免费会员。十分推荐新手入手
❤1
🤫葫芦侠机器人 https://t.me/HlXSgKbot?start=331227448 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:数据好,响应快,可以签到邀请人可以领取会员。易操作上手,智能识别,无需复杂指令 🤫葫芦侠批发价自助查档机器人 https://t.me/HlxDFbot 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:价格便宜,出单快,推荐 👀👀👀机器人一条龙服务
❤4
🤫76号档案室机器人 https://t.me/DT76Hbot?start=invite_331227448 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 夯 小编留言:数据庞大,响应快,功能也很多,来自不同库的总结,使用效果极佳
❤1
🤫天启机器人 https://t.me/TianQiSGK_bot?start=ref_331227448 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:数据不错,响应快,免费使用,可以签到
💥纸飞机最强社工库组合💥 💥频道主主推 谁用谁牛逼💥 五月天社工库机器人 https://t.me/sgk250bot?start=5143791 五月天二号社工库机器人 https://t.me/SGK250_bot 没有签到!群组免费使用!无需积分! 强烈推荐:最好用的社工库。数据完整高达几十亿,查询出的内容丰富使用方便速度快准确高,以上链接有多个机器人方便结合起来方便。 推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 小编留言:数据庞大,响应快,2号机器人不用积分功能免费使用。付费客服靠谱出单还效率!信誉至上的品牌
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DKGGMOD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@DKGGMOD edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,003,834 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“开盒社工库开户机器人🤖” (@DKGGMOD), 5,374 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DKGGMOD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.