Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
我打假 你急啥?
@DJJSCZ1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002461818876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DJJSCZ1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 8 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DJJSCZ1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 3 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 8 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2024 to 30 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
最新个户机器人 @ceshicebot 独家接口
🔈🔈🔈美工 在线接单 📌📌📌老板可以来喽 热门刑侦板子 ✅各类P图 ✅头像定制 🆘宣传片等 🆘都可以来喽👑。 @JSCZ2
此版全户 懂得都懂 就图一乐 p2 哪张照片哪位人才 性别都p错了
👍1
接到投稿 各位同行 自行辨别
我打假 你急啥? pinned «投稿 打假 联系 @NSN_ttkxbot»
投稿 打假 联系 @NSN_ttkxbot
大家好 我还是那个江上春早啊 今天我来说一下市面上新拍照个户啊 那个新拍照个户 根据目前我所掌握的一些 证据 推断出来啊 为p图 注(推断出来啊 、真假大家自己看就行了啊) 图片大家都能看到啊 鼠标 是一丝不动的 目测 这位条哥 是超级计算机啊 非常的nb 前面空留的距离也是一模一样 可见这位条哥的功底非常nb 应该是一位老刑侦了吧🤣 还有就是 宣传 🈳也给图 让条免费打工的啊 请问这种不想赚钱 且嫌弃自己新换的手机内存大了 或者说条这样操作 是降低 被 按 的风险的这种条哪里找 😂 行了就说这么多 大家真假自辨吧
我打假 你急啥? pinned «江上春早 打假中心 欢迎大家来投稿 或者 吃瓜 @DJJSCZ1»
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @DJJSCZ1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DJJSCZ1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“我打假 你急啥?” (@DJJSCZ1), 3 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DJJSCZ1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.