Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Die Weltwoche

Channel

Die Weltwoche

@DIE_WELTWOCHE

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

15,685subscribers

+92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001944772552
TypeChannel
Username@DIE_WELTWOCHE
DescriptionDie andere Sicht – unabhängig, kritisch, gut gelaunt. Die ganze Weltwoche digital lesen. Für nur 9 Franken. 👇🏻 https://weltwoche.ch/spezial/
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/DIE_WELTWOCHE

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,58815,71615,6526 August 2026 — 15,593 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,593 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,604 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,609 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,602 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,597 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,593 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,604 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,602 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,612 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,609 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,604 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,603 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,602 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,604 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,597 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,591 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,588 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,595 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,592 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,598 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,599 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,604 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,602 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,598 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,604 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,618 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,633 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,624 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,635 subscribers26 September 2026 — 15,698 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,711 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,702 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,699 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,694 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,693 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,691 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,698 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,700 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,703 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,707 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,701 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,703 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,704 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,709 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,713 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,716 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,709 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,701 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,698 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,705 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,700 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,698 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,695 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,690 subscribers8 November 2026 — 15,685 subscribers15,6856 August 20268 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 94 days, net +92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,569–15,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 05:5915,685-5
7 Nov 2026, 00:5815,690-5
6 Nov 2026, 00:3615,695-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:2715,698-2
4 Nov 2026, 05:5715,700-5
3 Nov 2026, 09:0415,705+7
2 Nov 2026, 06:4615,698-3
31 Oct 2026, 06:2715,701-8
30 Oct 2026, 02:5915,709-7
28 Oct 2026, 23:2015,716+3
27 Oct 2026, 19:0715,713+4
26 Oct 2026, 20:5115,709+5
25 Oct 2026, 23:0915,704+1
25 Oct 2026, 02:4115,703+2
23 Oct 2026, 23:5615,701-6
22 Oct 2026, 23:4715,707+4
22 Oct 2026, 01:0815,703+3
20 Oct 2026, 21:0015,700+2
19 Oct 2026, 17:0715,698+7
18 Oct 2026, 13:4415,691first reading

Engagement

543 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 15,685 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
112 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
112
of 543 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held543 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total211,009
Reactions total5,227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,140
Videos
≈1,930
Links
≈14,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 06m
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 130 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

25,839 reactions across 522 posts, in 61 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,51821.4%
💯4,80918.6%
🤮2,5679.93%
👏1,9227.44%
❤1,5095.84%
🤣1,2034.66%
🤡1,1844.58%
💩9103.52%
🤬8463.27%
😈6742.61%
🔥6662.58%
👎5942.30%
😁5652.19%
🤔5352.07%
🖕4381.70%
🤯2921.13%
🙏2681.04%
👌2010.778%
🙈1880.728%
😱1320.511%
41 further kinds8183.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 542 of the 543 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,802 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 543 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 112 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC959 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Köppel: «Amerika ist das Musterland der Demokratie – nicht Europa!»

💯29👏7🗿2👍1🤮1

8 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,380 views55 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Köppel: «Trump-Bashing ist nur ein Ablenkungsmanöver!»

👍37💯10👏5❤1👎1🤣1

8 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,430 views28 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Wurzel allen Übels Die Liberalen und die Konservativen haben den Linken das Feld überlassen. Warum? ✍️ Von Anabel Schunke 🔗 Hier ganzen Kommentar lesen: https://weltwoche.de/story/wurzel-allen-uebels/

💯18🤡6👍3🍌1

8 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,960 views90 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Köppel: «Die EU tritt Wohlstand, Freiheit und Demokratie mit Füssen!»

💯82👍4🙏4

7 Nov 2026, 19:30 UTC≈2,220 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

10-Milliarden-Schuldenberg bei der Invalidenversicherung: Bundesrätin Baume-Schneider (SP) präsentiert einen neuen Sanierungsvorschlag – die Schulden bleiben aber weiterhin bestehen 🔗 Jetzt lesen: https://weltwoche.ch/daily/10-milliarden-schuldenberg-bei-der-invalidenversicherung-bundesraetin-baume-schneider-sp-praesentiert-einen-neuen-sanierungsvorschlag-die-schulden-bleiben-aber-weiterhin-bestehen/?utm_term=Autofee…

🤮19❤11🤡4👎2🤬1

7 Nov 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,100 views50 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

EU stellt Entlastung in Aussicht: Deutschland soll 2027 keine zusätzlichen Flüchtlinge aus anderen EU-Staaten aufnehmen müssen 🔗 Jetzt lesen: https://weltwoche.de/daily/eu-stellt-entlastung-in-aussicht-deutschland-soll-2027-keine-zusaetzlichen-fluechtlinge-aus-anderen-eu-staaten-aufnehmen-muessen/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1794031452

🤡18😁13🥱11❤4🖕2🤮1🤷‍♀1

7 Nov 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,270 views100 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Die Farce der Bundespräsidentenwahl: Promis wie Luisa Neubauer dürfen Steinmeiers Nachfolge mitwählen. Der Bürger darf zuschauen 🔗 Jetzt lesen: https://weltwoche.de/daily/die-farce-der-bundespraesidentenwahl-promis-wie-luisa-neubauer-duerfen-steinmeiers-nachfolge-mitwaehlen-der-buerger-darf-zuschauen/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1794031405

🤮60👎19💩9🖕6🤡5😱1

7 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,180 views60 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Geheimes Foltergefängnis der ASOW-Garde in Kiew entdeckt?! 😮

🤬38🤯9💯5😱5🙏2❤1

7 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,010 views47 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Köppel: «Wenn jetzt Trump ausfällt als Friedensmacht. Warum nicht die Europäer?» 🤔

👍25🤣18💯3🤯1

7 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,980 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Lenny Fischer: «Nicht der Iran-Krieg ist das Problem – Reallöhne stagnieren seit 15 Jahren!»

🤔20💯10👍6👎2❤1

7 Nov 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,040 views95 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ukraine-Vertrauter übernimmt Bundeswehr-Spitze: Wer ist Christian Freuding, der Deutschlands Armee für einen möglichen Konflikt mit Russland rüsten soll? 🔗 Jetzt lesen: https://weltwoche.de/daily/ukraine-vertrauter-uebernimmt-bundeswehr-spitze-wer-ist-christian-freuding-der-deutschlands-armee-fuer-einen-moeglichen-konflikt-mit-russland-ruesten-soll/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1794…

🤮66🤡9💩8🖕4🔥3😱2❤1🤬1

7 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,010 views30 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

«Ende des Trumpismus»: Der konservative Autor Christopher Caldwell über die Abenddämmerung einer Ära ✍️ Interview von Urs Gehriger 🔗 Hier geht’s zum ganzen Artikel: https://weltwoche.de/story/ende-des-trumpismus/

👍9🤣7🤔5🤡4💯3👨‍💻1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 543 posts we hold for @DIE_WELTWOCHE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Politik Spezial
@PolitikSpezial · 26,566
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Philipp Kruse, Rechtsanwalt
@philippkruse · 21,907
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 September 2026
Paul Brandenburg
@paulbrandenburg · 45,198
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 August 2026
Dr. Daniele Ganser
@DanieleGanser · 73,330
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
AUF1
@auf1tv · 271,910
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Tichys Einblick
@tichyseinblicknews · 19,813
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
Dietrich Klinghardt Archiv&Backup
@DietrichKlinghardt · 24,537
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Ignaz Bearth offiziell
@ignazbearth · 32,432
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Nius
@niusde · 35,338
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Tom Lausen ‼️❗️original Datenanalyst
@TomLausen · 45,176
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Carsten Jahn - TEAM HEIMAT
@CarstenJahn_TEAMHEIMAT · 67,019
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Heiko Schöning offiziell
@heiko_schoening · 34,074
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
🇨🇭QS24 | Schweizer Gesundheitsfernsehen - Eine Perspektive mehr Gesundheit & Persönlichkeitsentwicklung.
@QS24_tv · 27,076
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Uncut-News.ch "Das Original"🇨🇭Unabhängige Analysen und Informationen zu Geopolitik, Wirtschaft, Gesundheit, Technologie
@uncut_news · 102,121
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Bernie aus Australien 🇦🇺 ®™
@bernie006 · 32,320
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD)
@christineanderson · 34,948
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Ernst Wolff
@Wolff_Ernst · 21,710
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
DruschbaFM
@DruschbaFM · 24,957
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
apolut.
@apolut · 86,257
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Achtung, Reichelt!
@AchtungReichelt · 21,396
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft
@ProfHockertz · 54,183
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Digitaler Chronist
@DigitalChronist · 29,154
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
reitschuster.de
@reitschusterde · 204,770
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Anti-Spiegel - Offizieller Kanal
@AntiSpiegel · 121,731
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q870443 on Wikidata, read 8 November 2026
LabelDie Weltwoche
DescriptionSwiss newspaper
X / Twitter@Weltwoche
YouTubeUCq-b0dwW97YRZWgSCikWQRA
Official sitehttps://www.weltwoche.ch

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Die Weltwoche” (@DIE_WELTWOCHE), 15,685 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DIE_WELTWOCHE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.