Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧСтные новости Москвы 🚨

Channel

ЧСтные новости Москвы 🚨

@DGONews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,214subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001597228121
TypeChannel
Username@DGONews
Created28 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DGONews

Growth

4,2144,2214,217.56 August 2026 — 4,220 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,221 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,218 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,216 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,214 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,213–4,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:584,214-2
12 Aug 2026, 13:444,216-2
9 Aug 2026, 21:124,218-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:404,221+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:474,220first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 4,214 subscribers
Avg views / post
437
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.849%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total7,874
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1032.3%
👏1032.3%
619.4%
🙏39.68%
👎13.23%
🤯13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мастерство на высоте 8️⃣ августа – Международный день альпинизма. Для работников Пожарно-спасательного центра Москвы работа на высоте – не хобби, а обязанность, требующая особой подготовки. ⚡️ Денис Макеев, спасатель АСО № 1 работает в Пожарно-спасательном центре Москвы с 2019 года. «Без навыков работы на высоте в нашем деле невозможно стать профессионалом». 📍 Спасательный альпинизм требует уверенной работы с вер

1

7 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC355 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Двух человек спасли на водоëмах столицы. 🚨7 августа работниками Московской городской поисково-спасательной службы на водных объектах были спасены два человека. 🚤Днëм дежурной сменой поисково-спасательной станции "Косино", во время патрулирования акватории озера Белое, была замечена женщина, ушедшая под воду и не появившаяся на поверхности. В 30 метрах от берега, с толщи воды, гражданка была поднята на борт катера и

2👏1

7 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC356 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Новый рекорд «Пожарного Олимпа» 📢 В самый разгар лета на учебно-тренировочной площадке Департамента ГОЧСиПБ для пожарных и спасателей в Апаринках прошли зрелищные соревнования «Пожарный Олимп». 7️⃣0️⃣ сильнейших спортсменов столичного Департамента ГОЧСиПБ и ГУ МЧС России по Москве сошлись в яркой конкурентной борьбе. ⏰ Дистанция включала 8 этапов, максимально приближённых к реальным вызовам: вскрытие металлической

7 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC357 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Дайджест июльских новостей Собрали подборку ярких событий из жизни Департамента ГОЧСиПБ за месяц. В этом выпуске: 🤩 Системе 112 Москвы исполнилось 14 лет 🤩 Провели интерактивные экскурсии для участников профориентационного проекта «ПРОгероев» 🤩 Подвели итоги работы Учебного центра ГО и ЧС за первое полугодие 2026 года 🤩 Дали советы любителям лесных походов и «тихой охоты» 🤩 Провели отборочный этап соревнован

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC476 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Помогли поднять затонувшую машину в НАО Днём 6 августа в Службу 112 Москвы поступило сообщение о затонувшем автомобиле в поселении Кокошкино. 🚨На место происшествия были высланы расчёт аварийно-спасательного отряда №6 столичного Пожарно-спасательного центра и мобильная водолазная группа поисково-спасательной станции «Троицкая» Московской городской поисково-спасательной службы на водных объектах. По прибытии водол

1👍1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC511 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Двух человек спасли на водоëмах столицы. 🚨6 августа работниками Московской городской поисково-спасательной службы на водных объектах были спасены ребëнок и мужчина. 🚤Дежурной сменой поисково-спасательной станции "Академическая", во время патрулирования акватории Большого Садового пруда, был замечен мальчик, ушедший под воду и не появившийся на поверхности. В 15 метрах от берега, с толщи воды, ребëнок был поднят на

6 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC426 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Взошли на «Пожарный Олимп» ❕ В Москве прошли профильные соревнования Департамента ГОЧСиПБ для московских пожарных и спасателей. Специалисты проходили специальную дистанцию на время, она включала в себя: 1️⃣ надевание боевой одежды пожарного, рабочую проверку и включение в ДАСВ (дыхательный аппарат со сжатым воздухом) 2️⃣ перемещение блока при помощи ударов кувалды на силовом тренажёре «Удар» 3️⃣ бег «змейкой» с

👏8

6 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC434 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔥 ДО и ПОСЛЕ «Пожарного Олимпа» В жаркий летний день на учебно-тренировочной площадке для пожарных и спасателей Департамента ГОЧСиПБ в Апаринках прошли самые зрелищные профильные соревнования «Пожарный Олимп». ❓ Что включали в себя соревнования ❓ Какие чувства испытывали участники, преодолевая себя ❓ Кто одержал победу и стал чемпионом Совсем скоро ответим на эти вопросы, следите за нашими новостями 💖

👍9🙏3

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC400 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kgh_moscow

⚡️По прогнозам синоптиков, с 15:00 6 августа и до конца суток 7 августа в столице временами ожидаются гроза, ливневый дождь, ветер до 17 м/с, в дневные и вечерние часы 7 августа град. ❗️Просим горожан быть внимательными на улице в непогоду: не укрываться под деревьями и не парковать вблизи них автомобили.

👏1

6 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC440 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Безопасное лето: что важно знать родителям и детям 🧒 Летние каникулы – долгожданная пора для школьников, но настоящая головная боль для родителей. Пока мамы и папы на работе, дети предоставлены сами себе, и не всегда можно быть уверенным в их безопасности. Служба 112 Москвы регулярно принимает звонки о том, как подростки проводят свободное время: «Можно полицию вызвать? Тут дети из окна бросают пакеты с водой. Боль

6 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC462 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие москвичи! 🥵 По прогнозам синоптиков, сегодня в столице ожидается сильная жара, температура воздуха достигнет +29-31°С Рекомендуем соблюдать меры безопасности: ☀️Носите светлую воздухопроницаемую одежду (желательно из хлопка) с головным убором ☀️Пейте больше воды ☀️Во избежание теплового удара ограничьте пребывание под открытым солнцем. Если почувствовали недомогание, выпейте воды и отойдите в тень ☀️В ж

1👎1

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC486 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оказали помощь медикам 🚨Днем 5 августа в Службу 112 Москвы поступили сообщения: сотрудникам скорой помощи понадобилась помощь в транспортировке пациенток с большим весом в Щербинке и в районе Южное Бутово. 🚒По прибытии спасатели службы поискового и аварийно-спасательного обеспечения Московского авиационного центра переложили пациенток на специальные мягкие носилки и транспортировали в кареты скорой помощи для дал

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DGONews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 71,794 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Москва о важном
@social_mos_news · 135,117
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
ДТП и ЧП МОСКВА и МО
@dtp777 · 137,091
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Московская медицина
@dzdmos · 233,663
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Дептранс. Оперативно
@DtOperativno · 113,252
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
МОСКВА СЕГОДНЯ
@moskvae · 150,925
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧСтные новости Москвы 🚨” (@DGONews), 4,214 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DGONews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.