Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

#𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖗𝖆𝖙𝖊

@DESR3RAT3RS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

330subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003780245658
TypeChannel
Username@DESR3RAT3RS
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 16 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DESR3RAT3RS

Growth

3307 Aug 2026, 18:53 — 330 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 330 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:538 Aug 2026, 07:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 329–331 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:16330no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53330first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60101222461090091501456.0%
custom 60126247002140882941144.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩

custom 60101222461090091502

26 Mar 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

💎💎💎💎💎 Союзов мне. Союзы от 0+ Пдп: 1:1 - 4:4 Правила следящий: @ukiozz ✔️ #rp

17 Mar 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,110 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

💎💎💎💎💎 Союзов мне. Союзы от 0+ Пдп: 1:1 - 4:4 Правила следящий: @clclkic ✔️ #rp

custom 60101222461090091503custom 60126247002140882942

17 Mar 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,090 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩

custom 60101222461090091504custom 60126247002140882944

16 Mar 2026, 17:09 UTC983 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩chat rules 🤩boost 🤩union rules 🤩tiktok 🤩administration 🤩patent

custom 60101222461090091501custom 60126247002140882941

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DESR3RAT3RS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,297,636 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

.
@cherryskirr · 71 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

@ukiozz
@ukiozz · 31 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#𝖉𝖊𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖗𝖆𝖙𝖊” (@DESR3RAT3RS), 330 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DESR3RAT3RS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.