Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DDOS通知交流

Channel

DDOS通知交流

@DDOS_BOS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,481subscribers

+334 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002947651784
TypeChannel
Username@DDOS_BOS
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DDOS_BOS

Growth

8,9659,4949,229.57 August 2026 — 9,147 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,147 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,146 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,110 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,071 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,028 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,000 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,965 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,494 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,481 subscribers9,4817 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +334. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,886–9,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:489,481-13
27 Aug 2026, 19:359,494+529
24 Aug 2026, 18:358,965-35
21 Aug 2026, 11:149,000-28
18 Aug 2026, 05:329,028-43
14 Aug 2026, 19:469,071-39
11 Aug 2026, 02:349,110-36
7 Aug 2026, 21:469,146-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:019,147no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:579,147first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.9%
avg views ÷ 9,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,920
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.058%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held98 (1 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total467,626
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2148.8%
👎920.9%
🤣614.0%
👏24.65%
🤡24.65%
12.33%
🔥12.33%
😁12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC≈9,030 viewsread 29 August 2026

色站 炮台 导航 博彩 体育 支付通通可以攻击打死目标持续瘫痪。 SEO排名 同行快排都可进行DDOS攻击打死目标 定制计划基本无视任何防御策略 可针对不同策略来调整攻击参数 欢迎实力集团盘口承包DDOS攻击 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

28 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈8,340 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

色站 炮台 导航 博彩 体育 支付通通可以攻击打死目标持续瘫痪。 SEO排名 同行快排都可进行DDOS攻击打死目标 定制计划基本无视任何防御策略 可针对不同策略来调整攻击参数 欢迎实力集团盘口承包DDOS攻击 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,540 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🤡 往后询问请优先提供目标并告诉我你的预算,我给你评估目标适合什么套餐,告诉我你的攻击目标多还是少,我会给你推荐最优选择。 拒绝无效沟通,已读不回按照骗子拉黑处理。

🤡2

27 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC714 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

骗子色站攻击测试打死目标

👍2🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,180 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

DDOS网络攻击计划价格如下 周卡200u不限次数 月卡500u不限次数 机场攻击定制计划每月1000U 定制高级计划提供700G-1.2T UDP方法。 独立定制攻击服务价格如下并提供L4攻击: 1666U/月 2000U/月 3000U/月 5000U/月 提供针对SEO攻击板块攻击,批量采集关键词自动提交攻击面板 CC攻击完美绕过CF防御策略 出售定制cc攻击 独享api,可轮训定制攻击时间。 频道 @DDOS_BOS 定制计划已开通API权限,可以对接,可以制作自己的攻击平台 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

色站 炮台 导航 博彩 体育 支付通通可以攻击打死目标持续瘫痪。 SEO排名 同行快排都可进行DDOS攻击打死目标 定制计划基本无视任何防御策略 可针对不同策略来调整攻击参数 欢迎实力集团盘口承包DDOS攻击 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

👍1

27 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 29 August 2026

别来问没意义的问题。 所有攻击套餐不限制攻击次数! 所有定制计划都可以24小时轮询自动攻击! 周卡月卡只有CC攻击! 定制计划UDP 1.2T每次攻击流量! 定制计划是独立的,不存在排队攻击等问题! 定制计划提供技术指导问题!

27 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈4,550 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7684509104

27 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC≈6,760 viewsread 29 August 2026

色站 炮台 导航 博彩 体育 支付通通可以攻击打死目标持续瘫痪。 SEO排名 同行快排都可进行DDOS攻击打死目标 定制计划基本无视任何防御策略 可针对不同策略来调整攻击参数 欢迎实力集团盘口承包DDOS攻击 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

26 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 29 August 2026

色站 炮台 导航 博彩 体育 支付通通可以攻击打死目标持续瘫痪。 SEO排名 同行快排都可进行DDOS攻击打死目标 定制计划基本无视任何防御策略 可针对不同策略来调整攻击参数 欢迎实力集团盘口承包DDOS攻击 联系 @SEO_DDOS @usaxwa @KaiYuanCEO 私信机器人 @Catddosseobot

26 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC79 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

人间地狱国服服务器全面瘫痪 我们的老板真是疯了😊 持续攻击steam游戏人间地区全国服服务器!!!

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @DDOS_BOS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DDOS通知交流” (@DDOS_BOS), 9,481 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DDOS_BOS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.